Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Leakdown results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2003, 03:38 PM
  #1  
racemechanic
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
racemechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Leakdown results

I have just performed a leakdown test on an '86 944 engine with approx. 90,000 miles that I just purchased. Everything that I have seen says to do a leakdown test on a warmed up engine. Since this engine is out of the car, I can't warm it up. Does anyone have an idea of how much the cold engine will affect the results as opposed to a warm engine? They were pretty low, from 12% to 23% with the leakage going past the rings (air escaping from oil fill <img border="0" alt="[ouch]" title="" src="graemlins/c.gif" /> er). Looks like a rebuild!
Thanks for any input,
Jeff
Old 05-02-2003, 11:45 PM
  #2  
bryantch
AutoX
 
bryantch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

First I must say that I am not a mechanic, nor do I play one on television. However, I recently talked to my local neighborhood mechanic about doing a leakdown on my 3.0 motor because someone was interested in purchasing it and wanted the numbers. The mechanic told me that leakdown tests are all but worthless if the motor is out of the car. The oil is no longer in the places in the motor that it would be immediately after shutting down warm, ie around the piston skirts/rings, valve seals, etc. and therefore it is impossible, in his opinion, to get a usable number. A compression test is possible albiet difficult with the motor out.

Good luck

Ian
Old 05-03-2003, 07:20 AM
  #3  
pjc
Burning Brakes
 
pjc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Really needs to be a hot engine - typical results on a good engine are 5 to 10% Cold engine means the tolerances are greater which suggests your engine may be OK but it is difficult to tell. My 2.7 has done 104,000 miles and the readings were 6, 5, 8, 5, 5, 7% on cylinders 1 to 6 - so hey ho everything OK, if it ain't broke don't fix it!

pjc
Old 05-03-2003, 12:00 PM
  #4  
racemechanic
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
racemechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for the replies. I think I'll throw the readings to the owner and let him decide on new rings, bearings, etc.

jeff
Old 05-05-2003, 12:46 PM
  #5  
Schuey
Racer
 
Schuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

this place helps
Old 05-05-2003, 07:30 PM
  #6  
racemechanic
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
racemechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yes, it does!
Just out of curiosity, I performed a leakdown test on my mower before mowing. It had a leakdown of 35%!! Then I mowed the yard and let it cool down just a bit. I then retested it and it only had a 15% leakdown then! Quite suprising.
Jeff

PCA Member 10yrs
1965 911 #300468!
1974 914 2.0
1987 944
and a bunch of junk!
Oh yea, the 1988 Celebrity Wagon for the snow!
Old 05-05-2003, 09:01 PM
  #7  
ZCAT3
Three Wheelin'
 
ZCAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I like to see less than 10% leakdown in normal residential mowers -
Old 05-05-2003, 11:09 PM
  #8  
racemechanic
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
racemechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Guess there comes another rebuild! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />
Jeff



Quick Reply: Leakdown results



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:20 AM.