Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

68 911S....maybe??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2008, 09:51 PM
  #1  
murrayg
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
murrayg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotch Village, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default 68 911S....maybe??

Hi all,

This is my first post on a 911 forum, as I’m a 944 owner. WAIT…Don’t hang up!! I’m looking for a new project, an early 911. I looked at a “70 911T” project today. Complete car, solid with no rust, but completely apart and not alot of money. However, I don’t think it’s a 70 T. Here goes some numbers: Car S/N 118008XX, Motor 6192330, Transmission 911/01 7118537. I see this as a 68 911S, right?? What is the motor and trans? I was looking for a “longer” car, so initially I wasn’t interested in a 68…..but now I see it’s an S. How valuable / rare is a 68 911S. What to do??!!

Thanks,
Gord.
Old 01-02-2008, 10:10 PM
  #2  
JV911
Drifting
 
JV911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,459
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

welcome

yep the serial number is for a 68 S (1180001 - 11801267)

3rd digit "8" = 1968
4th digit "0" = S

engine seems to be a 69T and 5 speed tranny from a 1970

Originally Posted by murrayg
How valuable / rare is a 68 911S
VERY!

this one is a bit of a mongeral but is definately worth consideration. value wont be as high as something with "matching numbers"
Old 01-03-2008, 06:40 AM
  #3  
Allen70SSan Diego
Advanced
 
Allen70SSan Diego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gord:

My opinion is that any Early "S" in decent condition is very desirable.

The following information is from DR. B Johnson's " --911 & 912 Porsche, A Guide to Authenticity".

Chassis Serial # 11 800 XXX = 1968 911S Coupe
Transmission Type 1968 911S = 901/02 (5 Speed), 906/01 = Sportomatic
1968 911S Carburetors = Weber
Engine Serial # = 1968 911S = 4 080 XXX
(Engine 619 0001 thru 2455 = 1969 911T) Too Bad, makes the numbers matching question moot.

Al
Old 01-03-2008, 09:41 AM
  #4  
murrayg
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
murrayg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotch Village, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Well, this is looking very interesting. The owner is still convinced it’s a 1970 T, but he bought it like this (apart). I’m not going out of my way to convince him anything different. How big a deal is the mismatched motor and trans. Are 2.0L “S” engines impossible (read $$$$) to find. Also, since the # don’t match, then what would be the best choose for an engine, since the T engine is considerably down in power. Finally, any idea how many 68 911S were built and how many were exported to North America. This is getting fun! Thanks again.

Gord.
Old 01-03-2008, 12:56 PM
  #5  
Peter Zimmermann
Rennlist Member
 
Peter Zimmermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA, for now...
Posts: 20,607
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Gord: Total 911 production for MY 68 was slightly more that 9,000 cars (I don't know how many were Ss). Very few S models were shipped to North America - the car did not meet emission standards in the USA, so "none" were brought to the US (we only got 911/911L models). The closest engine true to a '68S would be a '67S, but many of those engines/parts have been consumed by racers competing in VARA, so any early 2.0 S will certainly be pricey. A decent alternate engine would be a '68 USA 911/911L engine, which was also fitted with Weber carbs, and produced 130 DIN hp, vs the 160 DIN hp of the S. The '68T was an RoW car only, not sold in the US.

If you pm me I can give you the name and number of a friend who might have a complete early aluminum housing 5-speed. I don't know the details, and would prefer that you deal directly with him.
Old 01-03-2008, 01:13 PM
  #6  
Conekilr
Burning Brakes
 
Conekilr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 982
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wink

We seem to have "opposite" cars...I have a 1970 T with a 68 2.0 S engine and we're both in Canada...
Old 01-03-2008, 05:12 PM
  #7  
ron_dargenio
Rennlist Member
 
ron_dargenio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mount Laurel NJ
Posts: 878
Received 33 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by murrayg
Well, this is looking very interesting. The owner is still convinced it’s a 1970 T, but he bought it like this (apart). I’m not going out of my way to convince him anything different. How big a deal is the mismatched motor and trans. Are 2.0L “S” engines impossible (read $$$$) to find. Also, since the # don’t match, then what would be the best choose for an engine, since the T engine is considerably down in power. Finally, any idea how many 68 911S were built and how many were exported to North America. This is getting fun! Thanks again.

Gord.
That's a damned good find! Best of luck with it!
Old 01-03-2008, 08:10 PM
  #8  
John D.
Banned
 
John D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Somewhere....
Posts: 10,005
Received 56 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peter Zimmermann
....A decent alternate engine would be a '68 USA 911/911L engine, which was also fitted with Weber carbs, .....
Yep.. And I can say that, as Jen and I have a '68 911/L sitting in our garage... I love everything about that car (it is EXCEPTIONAL!!) - 'cept, well - tuning those danged Weber carbs....



Best to you Pete, and all - for a wonderful 2008!

John
Old 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
  #9  
murrayg
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
murrayg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotch Village, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Thanks to everyone for helping me here.

First:
Conekilr, they sure are opposite alright. Yours is together, running and beautiful, this one…….not so much!! But do I sense an engine trade here?? I’ll pay shipping, Haha!

OK, more questions as I haven’t yet purchased this. Oh my, the early 911 world is SO different from the 944 world I know (Daaa!). This car is ratty, largely apart, but complete, and it appears solid. Lots of surface rust on parts, but “shell” looks solid. One advantage of it being all apart is that it’s easy to examine. Considering it’s an S, what should one pay for a project like this? Any feel for the value of a reasonable clean, # mismatching 68 911S?? Also, would resale of this car be limited to Canada, since 68S’s weren’t allowed in the U.S. (Thanks for this John!). I’m moving very slowly, but in the right direction, at least.

Thanks again,
Gord.
Old 01-04-2008, 07:09 PM
  #10  
racer
Drifting
 
racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A picture would help peg value a bit better. The folks on the "early S" registry might know better as well. Are you looking for a "investment with financial guarantees" or a "car"? Given the prsent described condition, this is a "car" or a project that may not see financial gain. A fully restored, numbers matching example is an "investment".
Old 01-04-2008, 07:53 PM
  #11  
Conekilr
Burning Brakes
 
Conekilr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 982
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Gord no engine swap at this time....Maybe I'd want your project to go with my engine since I have the most difficult part needed...

Pictures would help with valueing what you have...
Old 01-05-2008, 12:41 AM
  #12  
ked
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hsv AL
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think I'd be outta my f'ing mind to start into 911s by reconstructing a basket-case '68... on the other hand... go for it...
Old 01-05-2008, 11:41 PM
  #13  
theiceman
Team Owner
 
theiceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cambridge Ontario Canada
Posts: 27,019
Received 1,134 Likes on 810 Posts
Default

just to give you a reference point there is a 69 T Targa is for sale around the corner for about 17G.it has S brakes an S engine and an S suspension apparently. It is an obvious respray but it looks pretty solid, the interior and Targa roof are quite rough.
Old 01-06-2008, 12:44 AM
  #14  
Jay Gratton
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
Jay Gratton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 6,567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by John D.
Yep.. And I can say that, as Jen and I have a '68 911/L sitting in our garage... I love everything about that car (it is EXCEPTIONAL!!) - 'cept, well - tuning those danged Weber carbs....



Best to you Pete, and all - for a wonderful 2008]
John
John,
Is Jen's '68 L For Sale yet? I love that car!



Quick Reply: 68 911S....maybe??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:40 AM.