Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

964 cup1 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2017, 08:48 PM
  #16  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,434
Received 2,082 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
I've no data on 3.8 RSR, The 3.8Rs used 9x18

The info I posted comes from factory parts book for '92 & 93 Carrera 2 Cup & partially confirmed w/ factory wheel TSBs

Just a guess but one of 2 things seems likely
1) mistake
2) for the low production run RSR they used a center from 1 wheel and lip from another

An impression stamp was used to mark the wheel so possibly mis-marked? I highly doubt it though. Hard to believe a mistake was made at this level. The 11's have a distinct part number if these are a different offset than the Cup rears than I would assume a different part number would be assigned at least the digit. These are clearly factory and are a matched set of 4 with same production dates and serial number markings. There are more QC inspection stamps on these than I have seen on the turbo 3.6 speedlines.


I would love to see a rear 9.5 from a cup car and see how they are marked. I will start another thread to see if we can get the bottom of this.

The 9's were ET 48 AFAIK
Old 09-09-2017, 08:58 AM
  #17  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,336
Received 553 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
An impression stamp was used to mark the wheel so possibly mis-marked? I highly doubt it though. Hard to believe a mistake was made at this level. The 11's have a distinct part number if these are a different offset than the Cup rears than I would assume a different part number would be assigned at least the digit. These are clearly factory and are a matched set of 4 with same production dates and serial number markings. There are more QC inspection stamps on these than I have seen on the turbo 3.6 speedlines.


I would love to see a rear 9.5 from a cup car and see how they are marked. I will start another thread to see if we can get the bottom of this.

The 9's were ET 48 AFAIK
Yes, the 3.8RS Speedline 9 was ET48 & the 11 was ET5

Here's some pics of the 9.5 x17




I have an old CD test of an RSR they list 9.5 & 11.5 x18 for the wheels
Old 09-09-2017, 10:34 AM
  #18  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,434
Received 2,082 Likes on 1,251 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
Yes, the 3.8RS Speedline 9 was ET48 & the 11 was ET5

Here's some pics of the 9.5 x17




I have an old CD test of an RSR they list 9.5 & 11.5 x18 for the wheels
I don't believe an 11.5 x 18 speedline was made. Although most of the RSR's used BBS's and most likely were what was used on the CD test.

I started another thread in the Cup car section for those interested in following. https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-...fset-info.html
Old 09-09-2017, 05:21 PM
  #19  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,336
Received 553 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
I don't believe an 11.5 x 18 speedline was made. Although most of the RSR's used BBS's and most likely were what was used on the CD test.

I started another thread in the Cup car section for those interested in following. https://rennlist.com/forums/porsche-...fset-info.html
The same info info was posted in CD and Pano in an artuicle by Jurgen Barth, the both actually printed 11.4" I took the liberty of changing to 11.5, could have been 11, who knows. The wheels pictured in both are Speedlines



Quick Reply: 964 cup1 question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:19 PM.