991 GT3 Track Lap Times
#31
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,186
Received 1,150 Likes
on
568 Posts
Thunderhill over the top/cyclone - 1:58 (me), 1:57 (ben)
Sonoma Raceway - 1:49 (me), 1:48 (ben)
Laguna Seca - 1:38 (me), 1:37 (ben)
You can see there is a pattern. Ben is always 1 second faster. The only exception has been the Thill 3 mile. I ran 3:30 there while Ben suffered from heat exhaustion in 113F weather and ran 3:33.
While there are those capable of much faster times, my goal is to try to shave another 1-2 seconds off of these times. Compared to my boxster spyder, I'm 6 seconds faster at Thill, but only 3 seconds faster at MRLS and Sonoma. I'm still bummed that Randy Pobst hasn't run a lap at MRLS with the GT3. I'm going to guess that he would have gotten a low 1:35.
Sonoma Raceway - 1:49 (me), 1:48 (ben)
Laguna Seca - 1:38 (me), 1:37 (ben)
You can see there is a pattern. Ben is always 1 second faster. The only exception has been the Thill 3 mile. I ran 3:30 there while Ben suffered from heat exhaustion in 113F weather and ran 3:33.
While there are those capable of much faster times, my goal is to try to shave another 1-2 seconds off of these times. Compared to my boxster spyder, I'm 6 seconds faster at Thill, but only 3 seconds faster at MRLS and Sonoma. I'm still bummed that Randy Pobst hasn't run a lap at MRLS with the GT3. I'm going to guess that he would have gotten a low 1:35.
I think you are faster at T-hill by so much because 1) more T-hill days to get comfortable with GT3; 2) less walls, so GT3 speeds are not as intimidating. Also, Sonoma rewards reckless abandon in regards to the cost of totaling the car, so it generally does not favor GT3s
By the way, 1:24.1 is my PB for the West course. Not sure if it's any good - I was sliding around on purpose, finishing off tires.
#34
Nordschleife Master
That's amazing how close our times are. Judging from vids, my PBs are somewhere between yours and Bens for T-hill and Sonoma. At Laguna I barely got 1:39.9 (but I got tons of excuses for that), and the 5-mile, where I got low 3:29s over the top (on a cooler day though). I'd like to think that they are so close because we are all approaching the limits of these cars, but I'm not going to fool myself.
I think you are faster at T-hill by so much because 1) more T-hill days to get comfortable with GT3; 2) less walls, so GT3 speeds are not as intimidating. Also, Sonoma rewards reckless abandon in regards to the cost of totaling the car, so it generally does not favor GT3s
By the way, 1:24.1 is my PB for the West course. Not sure if it's any good - I was sliding around on purpose, finishing off tires.
I think you are faster at T-hill by so much because 1) more T-hill days to get comfortable with GT3; 2) less walls, so GT3 speeds are not as intimidating. Also, Sonoma rewards reckless abandon in regards to the cost of totaling the car, so it generally does not favor GT3s
By the way, 1:24.1 is my PB for the West course. Not sure if it's any good - I was sliding around on purpose, finishing off tires.
1:24 on the thill west side seems about right. I ran 1:26 with the spyder, and it's a short course with no big areas for large power advantage.
#35
East Coast Tracks
Need some times from east coast tracks.
We ran Watkins Glen a couple of weeks ago and my best recorded time - before my lap timer quit- was about 1:13. I believe I had some faster laps following the last recorded one, some PB likely about 1:12. Last year, also ran 1:13 in 997.2 GT3, so clearly have potential for better times - except track was very bumpy and in relatively poor condition which we all agreed was worth about 1 second. Reason for shutting down track to repave.
At Summit Point, ran 1:21.9 this year, which compares with 1:21.8 last year in 997.2, so clearly have not pushed 991 close to what it (and I) can do. Will push a bit harder in a few weeks.
991 is completely stock. 997.2 ran on 888's, and had minor suspension mods, toe links and AP rotors.
Rob in Potomac
We ran Watkins Glen a couple of weeks ago and my best recorded time - before my lap timer quit- was about 1:13. I believe I had some faster laps following the last recorded one, some PB likely about 1:12. Last year, also ran 1:13 in 997.2 GT3, so clearly have potential for better times - except track was very bumpy and in relatively poor condition which we all agreed was worth about 1 second. Reason for shutting down track to repave.
At Summit Point, ran 1:21.9 this year, which compares with 1:21.8 last year in 997.2, so clearly have not pushed 991 close to what it (and I) can do. Will push a bit harder in a few weeks.
991 is completely stock. 997.2 ran on 888's, and had minor suspension mods, toe links and AP rotors.
Rob in Potomac
#38
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,443
Received 3,798 Likes
on
2,196 Posts
My best recorded laps at WG were 2:09s, but I was lazy and only timed a fraction of my laps. Maybe there were some untimed 2:08s in there, but could be wishful thinking. Fastest session was probably my last one, but I didn't go out with the timer on because the track was somewhat wet, but it wound up drying completely and there was almost no traffic. The esses were bumpy, which can feel disconcerting, but the car was able to find grip if asked to do so.
At Tbolt, my best laps were 1:31s, but there was traffic, and the rear grip continued to fall away over the day, I think because the rear tires are almost done (about 2900 track miles on them), whereas the front tires are much newer. Driving a loose car slows me down quite a bit. With better rear tires and no traffic, I think I could have easily been in 1:30s. Others will surely get to 1:29s, maybe lower.
At Summit Point, I just started timing laps and had a few 1:21s with some traffic, and theoretical best is 1:20.4. When I can actually do 20s with some consistency, I'll be happy. If I can get to 19s, may reward myself with a cup car.
At Tbolt, my best laps were 1:31s, but there was traffic, and the rear grip continued to fall away over the day, I think because the rear tires are almost done (about 2900 track miles on them), whereas the front tires are much newer. Driving a loose car slows me down quite a bit. With better rear tires and no traffic, I think I could have easily been in 1:30s. Others will surely get to 1:29s, maybe lower.
At Summit Point, I just started timing laps and had a few 1:21s with some traffic, and theoretical best is 1:20.4. When I can actually do 20s with some consistency, I'll be happy. If I can get to 19s, may reward myself with a cup car.
#39
My best recorded laps at WG were 2:09s, but I was lazy and only timed a fraction of my laps. Maybe there were some untimed 2:08s in there, but could be wishful thinking. Fastest session was probably my last one, but I didn't go out with the timer on because the track was somewhat wet, but it wound up drying completely and there was almost no traffic. The esses were bumpy, which can feel disconcerting, but the car was able to find grip if asked to do so.
At Tbolt, my best laps were 1:31s, but there was traffic, and the rear grip continued to fall away over the day, I think because the rear tires are almost done (about 2900 track miles on them), whereas the front tires are much newer. Driving a loose car slows me down quite a bit. With better rear tires and no traffic, I think I could have easily been in 1:30s. Others will surely get to 1:29s, maybe lower.
At Summit Point, I just started timing laps and had a few 1:21s with some traffic, and theoretical best is 1:20.4. When I can actually do 20s with some consistency, I'll be happy. If I can get to 19s, may reward myself with a cup car.
At Tbolt, my best laps were 1:31s, but there was traffic, and the rear grip continued to fall away over the day, I think because the rear tires are almost done (about 2900 track miles on them), whereas the front tires are much newer. Driving a loose car slows me down quite a bit. With better rear tires and no traffic, I think I could have easily been in 1:30s. Others will surely get to 1:29s, maybe lower.
At Summit Point, I just started timing laps and had a few 1:21s with some traffic, and theoretical best is 1:20.4. When I can actually do 20s with some consistency, I'll be happy. If I can get to 19s, may reward myself with a cup car.
I plan on driving TBolt end of August and will see what I remember and how quickly I relearn track.
As far as SP, I am in complete agreement with you, I think 1:20 flat was my virtual best also, but there is more available in the esses and especially entering T10.
Rob in Potomac
#40
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,443
Received 3,798 Likes
on
2,196 Posts
At the Glen, it is all about confidence. Starting with T1, might be able to keep foot to floor until bus stop - this really has potential for reducing lap times. Not there yet. Also entering T6 down chute and through to T11 - entering front straight, lot of room for improvement, but as you saw last weekend, T6 ate up a lot of race cars. Would love to get down to 2:08's, but that will have to wait until next year.
I plan on driving TBolt end of August and will see what I remember and how quickly I relearn track.
As far as SP, I am in complete agreement with you, I think 1:20 flat was my virtual best also, but there is more available in the esses and especially entering T10.
Rob in Potomac
I plan on driving TBolt end of August and will see what I remember and how quickly I relearn track.
As far as SP, I am in complete agreement with you, I think 1:20 flat was my virtual best also, but there is more available in the esses and especially entering T10.
Rob in Potomac
I'm not yet comfortable with the car at SP. Feels fine when doing 22s or 23s, but when going faster than that, I continue to be plagued by instability in the bumpy braking zones for T3, T5, and T10. As you suggested, straightening my line from T9 to T10 helped, but still having issues. I'm going to try asking less of the brakes and smoothing things out in general.
My Tbolt number is just something thrown out there as a data point. I don't have enough time at that track to be comfortable really pushing it, and I timed some laps mainly just to set a personal benchmark to gauge my progress in the future. I suspect that plenty of 991 GT3 guys will be posting faster times this season.
#41
Intermediate
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Benchmark for The Ridge?
Has anybody done The Ridge in WA and have some benchmark times in the 991 GT3 from there?
Pacific Raceways?
I'll try to get on these later this summer and would love to have some benchmarks.
Pacific Raceways?
I'll try to get on these later this summer and would love to have some benchmarks.
#42
Rennlist Member
Brainerd K MICHAEL STEWART 1:47.680 2013-07-28 Enduro Race
CMP K CLARKE SIMPSON 1:38.392 2013-10-25 Qualifying
COTA K MICHAEL STEWART 2:39.103 2013-05-11 Qualifying
Daytona K JAMES STANISLAW 2:02.697 2014-10-26 Enduro Race
Hastings K ROLAND MANARIN 1:35.563 2013-06-01 Sprint Race
Heartland K ROLAND MANARIN 1:48.330 2012-04-14 Sprint Race
Laguna Seca K TOM GATSOULIS 1:42.068 2015-06-07 Sprint Race
Lime Rock K BARRY LUCAS 1:00.656 2012-04-28 Qualifying
Mid-Ohio Pro Course K GEORGE TSANTES 1:36.506 2013-07-07 Enduro Race
Monticello K JEAN AUDET 2:35.279 2015-05-09 Qualifying
NJMP Thunderbolt K KEN NIELSEN 1:27.015 2013-08-25 Sprint Race
NJMP Thunderbolt with Chicane K TIM HOLT JR 1:31.575 2012-05-13 Sprint Race
Road America K MICHAEL STEWART 2:32.127 2013-09-01 Sprint Race
Road Atlanta K JAMES STANISLAW 1:33.080 2015-03-28 Sprint Race
Roebling Road K JAMES STANISLAW 1:17.762 2013-03-02 Sprint Race
Sebring K JAMES STANISLAW 2:19.444 2015-02-01 Enduro Race
Summit Point K CLARKE SIMPSON 1:16.770 2013-09-28 Qualifying
VIR K CLARKE SIMPSON 2:01.077 2013-06-22 Qualifying
Watkins Glen K TIM HOLT 2:04.661 2012-06-02 Sprint Race
#43
At WG, I'm flat coming out of T1, but I have to lift somewhat before T2 and am not flat again until after the apex of T3. You'll definitely run wide in T2 if you attempt to do it flat. I think you were losing time in T6 due to braking late and turning in late, which killed your momentum. I brake earlier and less, carry more speed in, and turn in earlier, to take advantage of the camber. And in general, I think fully exploiting the camber is one of the keys to WG (eg, I don't unwind the steering in T1 until I'm close to tracking out, since the camber allows you to both hold the steering - or even add some steering - and continue feed in throttle). Of course, after the repaving, the track will be somewhat of a new ballgame!
I'm not yet comfortable with the car at SP. Feels fine when doing 22s or 23s, but when going faster than that, I continue to be plagued by instability in the bumpy braking zones for T3, T5, and T10. As you suggested, straightening my line from T9 to T10 helped, but still having issues. I'm going to try asking less of the brakes and smoothing things out in general.
.
I'm not yet comfortable with the car at SP. Feels fine when doing 22s or 23s, but when going faster than that, I continue to be plagued by instability in the bumpy braking zones for T3, T5, and T10. As you suggested, straightening my line from T9 to T10 helped, but still having issues. I'm going to try asking less of the brakes and smoothing things out in general.
.
With regard to WG, little surprised that you feel T2 cannot be taken flat out. I am not certain but I think that at some point I was flat out after entering T2 to bus stop - unless you are referring to entrance to T2. But, you are right on with regard to camber, that is reason we have a track walk on Friday evenings for green and new to track drivers.
Rob in Potomac
#45
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,443
Received 3,798 Likes
on
2,196 Posts