Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Taycan Turbo - EPA rated 201 miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2020, 03:24 PM
  #856  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,436
Received 3,778 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

pure and simple -my fuel tank is enough bigger that my crappy efficiency doesn't matter for total distance I can drive - grasping at straws - and we're comparing a $48,000 to a base $150,000 car - and claiming the 3x more expensive car that went the shorter distance is "winning"…yeah totally 100% conclusive - the Taycan is soooooo much better.
Old 02-02-2020, 03:37 PM
  #857  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,436
Received 3,778 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

give up the range issue people - Tesla has won that one - the Taycan is better in _EVERY_ other dimension than any other EV!!! It's even better than Tesla in charging ability (not charger availability but I'll spot it the time to fix that) - but in the range/efficiency metric the Taycan has quite the gap to close - that's ok - cause in every other metric it's better - play to your strengths - and I know which car I'd rather drive - but Porsche has some work to do to be less awful on the range/efficiency front.

I'm confident they'll get it in the .2
The following 2 users liked this post by daveo4porsche:
manitou202 (02-02-2020), SFsoundguy (02-02-2020)
Old 02-02-2020, 03:37 PM
  #858  
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
acoste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: California
Posts: 813
Received 138 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
Am I misunderstanding the chart? Didn't the Model 3 go further? It sounds like you are disagreeing with Dave's point while highlighting the Model 3 is superior to the Taycan in what people care about. I'm missing something.
edit:
Oops, missed Dave's rebuttal

What you missed is reading my post. I'm however not surprised about that.

Outside temperature is 44F. Taycan Turbo can likely reach its EPA rated range at 75F at this speed.
Old 02-02-2020, 04:00 PM
  #859  
AlexCeres
Rennlist Member
 
AlexCeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,859
Received 1,677 Likes on 1,027 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
pure and simple -my fuel tank is enough bigger that my crappy efficiency doesn't matter for total distance I can drive - grasping at straws - and we're comparing a $48,000 to a base $150,000 car - and claiming the 3x more expensive car that went the shorter distance is "winning"…yeah totally 100% conclusive - the Taycan is soooooo much better.
you got me. I decided to not spend $150,000 because 6% range is worth so much more than any reason I considered Porsche in the first place.


... said no one ever.
The following users liked this post:
bgatxy1 (02-02-2020)
Old 02-02-2020, 04:18 PM
  #860  
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
acoste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: California
Posts: 813
Received 138 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexCeres
except for the part where this is what people care about irrational or not for EV adoption. It’s range anxiety not efficiency anxiety.
According to these results Taycan's drive train is more efficient than Model 3's above ~80mph. Net battery capacity is about 15% higher but the road load is also higher for the Taycan. By 30% at 65mph. It is unlikely that this difference would shrink below 15% at 93mph.
Old 02-02-2020, 05:18 PM
  #861  
Dyefrog
Racer
 
Dyefrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 313
Received 124 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acoste
What you missed is reading my post. I'm however not surprised about that.

Outside temperature is 44F. Taycan Turbo can likely reach its EPA rated range at 75F at this speed.
Nope, didn't miss anything. I was responding to AlexCeres. Not sure what you're babbling about. It had nothing to do with whether the Taycan will meet the EPA range.
Old 02-02-2020, 05:34 PM
  #862  
TopspeedPT
Racer
 
TopspeedPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 342
Received 121 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
what is the efficiency - total range doesn't mater - the Model 3 has only a 75 kWh battery - and the Taycan has a 93 kWh battery - this is a pointless comparision with out wh/mile or miles/kWh

what is the overall efficiency in terms of energy consumed.

this is likely saying my Ford F150 pickup with a 40 gallon gas tank can go 480 miles vs. a Prius with an 8 gallon gas tank can only go 320 miles.

Model 3 @ 93 mph goes 332 km with ~72 kWh of energy or 4.6 km/kWh
Taycan @ 93 mph goes 314 km with ~84.3 kWh of energy or 3.7 km/kwh

so the Taycan is better than the Model 3 because the Model 3 is 25% more efficient than the Taycan at the same speed?

math says different - and so do the numbers.

the Taycan only went further than the Model cause it has a bigger gas tank

at the same kWh (72 kWh) the Taycan would've only gone 266 km at the same speed and energy budget.

this is a laughably stupid metric - my car goes further because it has a bigger gas tank is the height of stupidity as a comparison.
Don't forget the weight difference.

Model 3 RWD LR: ~1801kg
Taycan Turbo: 2380kg(over ~579kg)

Last edited by TopspeedPT; 02-02-2020 at 07:28 PM.
Old 02-02-2020, 05:59 PM
  #863  
acoste
Burning Brakes
 
acoste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: California
Posts: 813
Received 138 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dyefrog
Nope, didn't miss anything. I was responding to AlexCeres. Not sure what you're babbling about. It had nothing to do with whether the Taycan will meet the EPA range.
Originally Posted by Dyefrog
Am I misunderstanding the chart? Didn't the Model 3 go further?
It did by 6%, with aftermarket parts.

Originally Posted by acoste
Taycan Turbo range test at 93mph against a Model 3 LR RWD, lowered suspension. This lowering adds 7% to its range.
Old 02-02-2020, 06:03 PM
  #864  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,436
Received 3,778 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

and the current Model S P100D will go how far @ 93 mph? a more apples to apples comparison...
Old 02-02-2020, 11:40 PM
  #865  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,905
Likes: 0
Received 11,602 Likes on 5,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
@AlexCeres well in that case the Model 3 won -it went further than the Taycan - at 93 mph the Model 3 will go further than the Taycan - worse case they are equal - and one car cost about 1/3 of the other…

and people are not quite that stupid - they understand the reason they can drive their F150 350 miles is only because of it's huge fuel tank vs. a Toyota that has a much smaller tank can go the same distance…

the range difference isn't definitive - but the costs to purchase, and cost to fuel the two cars is vastly different - people aren't quite as silly as that - but close.
You gives us too much credit.
Old 02-02-2020, 11:45 PM
  #866  
Zcd1
Racer
 
Zcd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: MI/CA
Posts: 332
Received 135 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by acoste
Taycan Turbo range test at 93mph against a Model 3 LR RWD, lowered suspension.
Knew you would immediately post this result, even though it confirms that the Taycan is far less efficient (range per battery capacity) than any other EV.

The test is ludicrous, with the results only applicable on unlimited stretches of Autobahn, and so irrelevant for 95% of the driving done by 99% of the potential owners.

Run the test in typical conditions (varying speeds, including some city/stop and go driving) and it would be even clearer that the Taycan is >35% less efficient (range per battery capacity) than comparable EVs.

If it were also >35% faster, or had a >35% greater top speed, or >35% greater cornering ability, or >35% more load or luggage capacity, that would be one thing, but it's not close on any of those measures.

Still a cool car, but a woefully inefficient EV.



Quick Reply: Taycan Turbo - EPA rated 201 miles



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:25 PM.