The Transaxle Era
#3
Sure I know "why", but it's still a curiosity/oddity to me that these cars are being distinguished as 'Transaxles'. Alone, the term is too broad and ambiguous.
By definition, the 911/912/914 and practically every other Porsche sports car are also "transaxles". As is every aircooled (RWD) or watercooled (FWD) Volkswagen, and your typical oldschool riding lawnmowers.
I guess 'Front-Engine / Rear-Drive Transaxle' doesn't roll off the tongue as readily though.
By definition, the 911/912/914 and practically every other Porsche sports car are also "transaxles". As is every aircooled (RWD) or watercooled (FWD) Volkswagen, and your typical oldschool riding lawnmowers.
I guess 'Front-Engine / Rear-Drive Transaxle' doesn't roll off the tongue as readily though.
#5
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
There's some reference to the origin of term "transaxle" in this article on porsche.com
Last edited by MAGK944; 04-03-2017 at 09:09 PM.
#6
'Driveshaft' in German is 'Antriebswelle', and 'Propshaft' is 'Kardanwelle'
According to the nifty 'The Transaxle Era' book I got from the Porsche Museum, 'Transaxle' is.. well, 'Transaxle'.
Or more explicitly:
'Front-motoren und Transaxle-Getreibe an der Hinterachse'
Literally: "Front engines and transaxle-gearboxes at the Rear axle'
There's some reference to the origin of term "transaxle" in this article on porsche.com
A transaxle is any gearbox that combines the transmission and differential into the same unit, hence the discrepancy.
By all indications, it's being... shall we say... "repurposed" in this context to put special emphasis on the "trans"-mission of power from the front to rear of the car via a driveshaft. Whereas in other examples I gave, engines and transaxles are typically mated directly.
Seems to be more accurate they should have just called them the "Torque-tube cars".
I can accept it. Still funny though.
#7
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
..........nooooooooooooooo
It seems the term was probably something that somebody attached to the front engined, rear trans cars and it just stuck and now even the factory uses the term. I doubt there is any reference to a transaxle when these cars were in production. I bought one of mine new in 1986 and don't recal hearing the term used by the dealer at the time.
Trending Topics
#8
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
They did use the term in original marketing in 1977 and specifically called torque tube - Transaxle.
This ad translates to: gearbox at the back, engine at the front, transaxle in the middle.
This Transaxle video is nice, too bad it's in German..
This ad translates to: gearbox at the back, engine at the front, transaxle in the middle.
This Transaxle video is nice, too bad it's in German..
Last edited by Voith; 04-04-2017 at 05:05 AM.
#9
Just a car guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Lyon, Michigan, Ewe Ess Eh
Posts: 9,927
Received 836 Likes
on
525 Posts
I posted an article from Hemmings which also covered the 40 year anniversary of the "transaxle era". It got similar responses as here.
If I find it again, I'll insert the link....
Found it. It's been nearly a year:
https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-...ransaxles.html
Last edited by Scott at Team Harco; 04-04-2017 at 09:01 AM.
#10
#11
Three Wheelin'
I guess 'watercooled era' would have too confusing once the boxster and 996 were introduced.
#12
It seems the term was probably something that somebody attached to the front engined, rear trans cars and it just stuck and now even the factory uses the term. I doubt there is any reference to a transaxle when these cars were in production. I bought one of mine new in 1986 and don't recal hearing the term used by the dealer at the time.
Note that they didn't simply call it a 'Transaxle' though, it was qualified with location/position of engine as well.
This might support the theory that in usage, over the years, it simply got shortened to 'Transaxle' because nobody wanted to have to say the entire mouthful.
Concerning the 'Transaxle Era', I'm still tempted to level accusations of 'Revisionist History', however.
Good point.
#15
The word 'transaxle' also appears in some period 911/912/914 literature, but that doesn't make those cars any more or less worthy of being called 'Transaxles' than these, either.
Again.. the distinction I was making is when the 924/928/944/968 are referred to as 'Transaxles' in the absence of any other contextual description about the drivetrain.
If there is an example of period literature that does so, then we should consider that a finding.
The word 'transaxle' simply appearing in the literature - in the same context as all the other words like "front motor", "rear gearbox", etc. - has already been posted here, and is kind of missing the point of the discussion. Which is, how did this whole notion of these cars being singled out as 'Transaxles' - and no others - get started in the first place.
That's why it's a curiosity (to me, at least).
Again.. the distinction I was making is when the 924/928/944/968 are referred to as 'Transaxles' in the absence of any other contextual description about the drivetrain.
If there is an example of period literature that does so, then we should consider that a finding.
The word 'transaxle' simply appearing in the literature - in the same context as all the other words like "front motor", "rear gearbox", etc. - has already been posted here, and is kind of missing the point of the discussion. Which is, how did this whole notion of these cars being singled out as 'Transaxles' - and no others - get started in the first place.
That's why it's a curiosity (to me, at least).