Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

IMSB question and pictures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2017, 06:42 PM
  #1  
MiataR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MiataR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 375
Received 30 Likes on 10 Posts
Default IMSB question and pictures

Reaching out the the 996 forum brain trust to identify this bearing that was pulled from my car. Is this the OEM dual row or an aftermarket solution?





The bearing appears to be in exceptional condition... seals are in good shape as well.

Here is the bearing as compared to the LN solution.



Interesting that the LN part is not as deep.



Old 02-22-2017, 06:55 PM
  #2  
stan23
Racer
 
stan23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 310
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

looks like it's factory according to this link based on the PN on the bearing.

https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...s-bearing.html
Old 02-22-2017, 07:03 PM
  #3  
MiataR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MiataR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 375
Received 30 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Thanks Stan... I think that's pretty solid evidence that it's the OEM bearing.

Interesting (and surprising to me) that my 2001 had a dual row. Either way, the LN is going in as a replacement since it's all apart right now.
Old 02-22-2017, 07:05 PM
  #4  
Dpazos
Advanced
 
Dpazos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How many miles did you have on the dual row?
Old 02-22-2017, 07:11 PM
  #5  
MiataR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MiataR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 375
Received 30 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

118k on that bearing.
Old 02-22-2017, 07:59 PM
  #6  
rolex11
Pro
 
rolex11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Aventura, FL
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

My momma always said, "Life was like a box of Chocolates.....oops correction...

My Porsche Indy always said, "Life was like an IMSB. You never know what you're gonna get."
Old 02-22-2017, 08:39 PM
  #7  
stan23
Racer
 
stan23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 310
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

May I ask what build date is your car? Thanks!
Old 02-22-2017, 09:19 PM
  #8  
gnat
Nordschleife Master
 
gnat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,913
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MiataR
Thanks Stan... I think that's pretty solid evidence that it's the OEM bearing.

Interesting (and surprising to me) that my 2001 had a dual row. Either way, the LN is going in as a replacement since it's all apart right now.
Definitely an original dual row. Your story is exactly like mine. Went in expecting a single (and planned to do the Solution) and found a dual in our 01.

Had I known I would have left that sleeping dog alone.
Old 02-22-2017, 10:26 PM
  #9  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,790
Received 1,169 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MiataR
Reaching out the the 996 forum brain trust to identify this bearing that was pulled from my car. Is this the OEM dual row or an aftermarket solution?





The bearing appears to be in exceptional condition... seals are in good shape as well.

Here is the bearing as compared to the LN solution.



Interesting that the LN part is not as deep.



I think you need to be careful how you use the word "solution" as it pertains to the IMSB. That LN retrofit bearing is NOT "the solution" (which is a plain bearing)... I think you probably already realize this, but maybe chose the words accidently. Unfortunately, this just adds to the confusion amongst the many IMSB products that are now on the market. Ok, I'll hop off my soapbox now...
Old 02-23-2017, 11:45 AM
  #10  
dkraige
Pro
 
dkraige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 740
Received 47 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Not to hijack the thread, but is it possible to determine dual-row vs. single-row based on the part number of the IMS seal and cover? Not the bearing itself, just the seal and cover parts. My seal was replaced by a dealer under the previous owner and I have that part number, but no idea what bearing is in there.
Old 02-23-2017, 12:17 PM
  #11  
gnat
Nordschleife Master
 
gnat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,913
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dkraige
Not to hijack the thread, but is it possible to determine dual-row vs. single-row based on the part number of the IMS seal and cover?
If it is factory parts, yes. Don't know about the after market options.

You can tell the captured bearing by the size of the nut. It is considerably larger than on the older replaceable bearings. This shouldn't be found on a 996 unless it got a factory replacement engine after that bearing became available.

The dual and smaller single row can be differentiated by the depth of the bowl on the flange. Shown here from Pelican the left is the single row and the right is a dual row:


Old 02-23-2017, 12:38 PM
  #12  
MiataR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MiataR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 375
Received 30 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

More so out of curiosity, anyone know the reason/impact of the depth of the LN bearing being different than OEM? Why not make it the same size?
Old 02-23-2017, 12:45 PM
  #13  
Schnell Gelb
Drifting
 
Schnell Gelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,335
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MiataR
More so out of curiosity, anyone know the reason/impact of the depth of the LN bearing being different than OEM? Why not make it the same size?
Agreed,it is interesting & they are smart so there mus be a good reason..Speculating :

One reason might have been the additional expense of having that annular groove machined for the circlip - see photo NSK bearing above.

LN had achieved much additional load capacity anyway and did not need the extra few mm ?
Old 02-23-2017, 02:26 PM
  #14  
MiataR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MiataR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 375
Received 30 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stan23
May I ask what build date is your car? Thanks!
01/2001
Old 02-23-2017, 02:27 PM
  #15  
MiataR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MiataR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 375
Received 30 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

That's what I assumed as well, but perhaps if JR is reading, he can chime in on the reasoning.


Originally Posted by Schnell Gelb
Agreed,it is interesting & they are smart so there mus be a good reason..Speculating :

One reason might have been the additional expense of having that annular groove machined for the circlip - see photo NSK bearing above.

LN had achieved much additional load capacity anyway and did not need the extra few mm ?


Quick Reply: IMSB question and pictures



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:26 AM.