Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

C2 vs C4-opinions please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2016 | 11:38 AM
  #16  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 255
From: Centerton, AR
Default

Originally Posted by drcheap
How about maintainence costs and street performance in the dry compared.
With more hardware -- front axle/diff, cardan shaft -- there is always more to go wrong. If the front diff/viscous coupling "dies" a new front diff is thousands.

There are used ones available which can be had for less than new cost.

The AWD setup brings with it a more complex fuel tank and fuel supply system. The tank divides into two separate basins. These are not connected so to get fuel out of each basin there is a siphon jet.

In some cases a hose can fail and the car runs out of gas at around 1/2 tank. There is plenty of gas left just the non-functioning siphon jet can't remove it and supply the fuel to the engine.

Because of the split tank the fuel level is derived by the OBC and how the car is being driven. This appears to work ok actually. But if the fuel tank is low and one doesn't fill the tank up the added fuel may not register. I always fill the tank up when I fuel up the car so I have not ever experienced this.

As for performance enhancement I think it miminmal. The front diff is driven by a viscous coupling which relies upon a special fluid that when it gets hot (300F+) it becomes quite, well viscous, and torque is transfered to the front diff.

Porsche says anywhere from 5% to 40% with the 40% coming only when the car is going approx. 150mph.

When I bought my Turbo of course it came with the AWD system. If I knew then what I know now had there been a factory RWD only version of the Turbo I would have preferred that. (Well, there is the GT2 but for various reasons this wasn't a viable alternative.)
Old 10-10-2016 | 12:20 PM
  #17  
TonyTwoBags's Avatar
TonyTwoBags
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 18
Default

A major difference I've noted is the chrome "Carrera" logo on the back of a C4 vs. the black logo on the engine cover of the C2. To offset this I removed the black logo and put a chrome logo on my C2. Going for the rapper-Hummer look.

The answer to the implied question "which one is ideal / better / etc." seems self evident:
- Do you drive in snow or live in Seattle? If yes, C4(S) offers more utility
- Do you have a 2nd car or live in an area that has limited bad weather? If yes, C2's lighter weight & more classic handling characteristics might offer more fun.

I'm in a mountainous state with about 2-3 cold months/year when I'll let my C2 hibernate. For me the C2 is perfect. I don't really want to drive it with temps near 0F anyhow due to the scoring potential.

I've heard a rumor that you can disable the front wheels on the C4 for dyno tests by slightly pulling up the e-brake, fwiw
Old 10-10-2016 | 12:38 PM
  #18  
llis's Avatar
llis
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

I can speak only from test drives. C2 feels agile and with less weight up front, really planted under your butt. I never drove on on the track, but boy did I want to. (This goes for all the RWD 911s I've driven over the years.)

My C4S is a blast to drive, but I do feel the added weight up front. Coming from BMW world, that in itself isn't bothersome, but there is something of that gotta-race-this-thing feeling that's lost. But I wanted a 911 that would take me across mountain roads in winter and C4S seemed the way to go for that. Schedule kept me from taking her out to the track this year. Just this past weekend was a PCA event at my second-favorite track (that I've driven on—HPR) and it would have been a perfect cap on the summer before switching to the winter tire set.

Not sure if this is helpful. Money aside, I'd love to have BOTH!
Old 10-10-2016 | 02:13 PM
  #19  
charlieaf92's Avatar
charlieaf92
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 930
Likes: 99
From: cincinnati
Default

If I remember correctly the added weight of the AWD setup is give or take 118 pounds. Driving under normal conditions on a road - I can't imagine they're too different if at all. The biggest difference for normal use would be less frunk space up front. So, my opinion, is they're virtually the same for normal daily driving and to get whatever you want.
Old 10-10-2016 | 03:21 PM
  #20  
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,390
Likes: 1,930
From: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Default

Old 10-10-2016 | 03:31 PM
  #21  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 255
From: Centerton, AR
Default

Originally Posted by TonyTwoBags
A major difference I've noted is the chrome "Carrera" logo on the back of a C4 vs. the black logo on the engine cover of the C2. To offset this I removed the black logo and put a chrome logo on my C2. Going for the rapper-Hummer look.

The answer to the implied question "which one is ideal / better / etc." seems self evident:
- Do you drive in snow or live in Seattle? If yes, C4(S) offers more utility
- Do you have a 2nd car or live in an area that has limited bad weather? If yes, C2's lighter weight & more classic handling characteristics might offer more fun.

I'm in a mountainous state with about 2-3 cold months/year when I'll let my C2 hibernate. For me the C2 is perfect. I don't really want to drive it with temps near 0F anyhow due to the scoring potential.

I've heard a rumor that you can disable the front wheels on the C4 for dyno tests by slightly pulling up the e-brake, fwiw
The AWD won't help you a bit if you get the rear wheels stuck. If you spin the rear wheels too long/much this just burns up the viscous coupling.

There are a number of YouTube videos of 996 C4 and Turbo owners hooning around in the snow. Some show the rear wheels spinning furiously while the front wheels/tires are stationary or nearly so. Hardly any torque is being transmitted to the axle just the viscous coupling being abused.

And pulling on the e-brake handle has no effect on the AWD feature. The coupling between the rear diff and the front diff is through a viscous coupling that is always active.

If one ever needs to dyno a C4/Turbo it must be done on a dyno that has the rear rollers driving the front rollers.
Old 10-10-2016 | 04:06 PM
  #22  
TonyTwoBags's Avatar
TonyTwoBags
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 18
Default

^ interesting, thanks for the clarification.
Old 10-10-2016 | 04:11 PM
  #23  
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,390
Likes: 1,930
From: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by TonyTwoBags
^ interesting, thanks for the clarification.
Glad to hear my picture helped you Tony.
Old 10-10-2016 | 09:11 PM
  #24  
Vdubjetta02's Avatar
Vdubjetta02
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 285
Likes: 2
From: Colorado
Default

I think C2 base is like 2,900 and a C4s is 3,200.... that's a huge difference in a car with only 320 HP....

I own a C2 and my best friend bought a C4s last month... I went for a ride in his car yesterday, back to back comparison after driving my car and the two cars are actually completely different feeling... they DO NOT drive like each other...I was shocked. Mine is a 2003 and he has a 2002

Originally Posted by charlieaf92
If I remember correctly the added weight of the AWD setup is give or take 118 pounds. Driving under normal conditions on a road - I can't imagine they're too different if at all. The biggest difference for normal use would be less frunk space up front. So, my opinion, is they're virtually the same for normal daily driving and to get whatever you want.
Old 10-10-2016 | 09:39 PM
  #25  
Cuda911's Avatar
Cuda911
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 463
From: Oceanside/Vista (N. San Diego County), CA
Default

The phenomenon was first experimentally observed in a series of experiments by David Dunning and Justin Kruger of the department of psychology at Cornell University in 1999. The study was inspired by the case of McArthur Wheeler, a man who robbed two banks after covering his face with lemon juice in the mistaken belief that, because lemon juice is usable as invisible ink, it would prevent his face from being recorded on surveillance cameras.
I ain't never seen Gnat cover his face in lemon juice.

The C2 has a "2" instead of a "4."

[Hey... is this post visible to you guys? I put lemon juice on my keyboard, so it might be invisible.]
Old 10-10-2016 | 10:08 PM
  #26  
gnat's Avatar
gnat
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,913
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Cuda911
I ain't never seen Gnat cover his face in lemon juice. The C2 has a "2" instead of a "4." [Hey... is this post visible to you guys? I put lemon juice on my keyboard, so it might be invisible.]
I think you cracked the mystery of my hidden posts! I guess I need to lay off the lemonade.
Old 10-10-2016 | 11:49 PM
  #27  
wildbilly32's Avatar
wildbilly32
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 805
From: Flyover Country
Default

What post...?
Old 10-11-2016 | 12:22 AM
  #28  
Cuda911's Avatar
Cuda911
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 11,353
Likes: 463
From: Oceanside/Vista (N. San Diego County), CA
Default

Did some more Dunning Kruger research, and found something of interest. Although it may not apply to Mr. Tiny Annoying Bug, I believe there is one forum member that we can all see described to a T:


If you’ve observed carefully, people who aren’t very good at humour or sarcasm often tell poor jokes and expect people around them to laugh hard. But when people don’t laugh, they seem genuinely shocked. It is incredible to see them totally unaware of how bad they are at it.
Unfortunately, that member will be unable to recognize himself due to his Dunning Kruger affliction.
Old 10-11-2016 | 10:03 AM
  #29  
ZuffenZeus's Avatar
ZuffenZeus
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,390
Likes: 1,930
From: Zuffenhausen, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Cuda911
Did some more Dunning Kruger research, and found something of interest. Although it may not apply to Mr. Tiny Annoying Bug, I believe there is one forum member that we can all see described to a T:

Unfortunately, that member will be unable to recognize himself due to his Dunning Kruger affliction.
It's me, isn't it?!!! (sniffle sniffle). You didn't think my C2/C4 image was funny. (sniffle loudly) I'm so hurt, I'm going to curl up in a corner in a fetal position and suck my thumb! Oh the humanity!!!!!!!!!


shaaaa bam!
Old 10-11-2016 | 05:00 PM
  #30  
Slakker's Avatar
Slakker
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 270
From: Edmond, OK
Default

Originally Posted by b3freak
It's me, isn't it?!!! (sniffle sniffle). You didn't think my C2/C4 image was funny. (sniffle loudly) I'm so hurt, I'm going to curl up in a corner in a fetal position and suck my thumb! Oh the humanity!!!!!!!!!


shaaaa bam!
The mere fact you were able to recognize it was you, means it wasn't you.


Quick Reply: C2 vs C4-opinions please



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:25 AM.