Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The Lambos cheated!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2016 | 04:18 PM
  #31  
winders's Avatar
winders
Race Car
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 925
From: San Martin, CA
Default

Originally Posted by naroescape
They were given/told to use a restrictor, it was approved, they used it.
They did not use the "approved" restrictor. They used one Audi had been told to not use again.
Old 02-26-2016 | 04:27 PM
  #32  
NaroEscape's Avatar
NaroEscape
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 785
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by winders
They did not use the "approved" restrictor. They used one Audi had been told to not use again.
It passed pre-tech, it passed post-tech. and since it was a SPECIFIC point of discussion leading up to the race, it was SPECIFICALLY checked by IMSA tech. So if they passed it, then how could they later say it was illegal?
__________________
Bob Saville

Getting You On Track!
www.naroescapemotorsports.com
704-395-2975
  • Data Analysis & Coaching
  • Drivers Gear
  • Crew Gear
  • Car Gear

'07 SPC
'71 914/6 Huey
'04 GT3

Old 02-26-2016 | 04:36 PM
  #33  
winders's Avatar
winders
Race Car
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 925
From: San Martin, CA
Default

Getting through tech without an illegal part being found does not means all the parts on the car are legal. All it means is that tech did not find anything illegal. It also doesn't mean you can't get penalized later when the illegal part is discovered.
Old 02-26-2016 | 05:37 PM
  #34  
NaroEscape's Avatar
NaroEscape
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 785
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

go back and read Post #6 Scott...
Old 02-26-2016 | 07:24 PM
  #35  
winders's Avatar
winders
Race Car
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 925
From: San Martin, CA
Default

Originally Posted by naroescape
go back and read Post #6 Scott...
Post #6 seems to contain a quote that was obviously false. Lamborghini used a restrictor that was previously banned. They didn't build a new one. It appears to have the correct diameter openings but has other features that allowed the cars using it to make a lot more power than they should have. IMSA didn't give it to them. This is why all the manufacturer points were taken away.

If Lamborghini had done nothing wrong here, all hell would breaking loose. Things are quiet because they know they got caught actually cheating.
Old 02-27-2016 | 02:44 PM
  #36  
Speeds5's Avatar
Speeds5
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 909
Likes: 199
From: NJ
Default

This and this...

Originally Posted by winders
Getting through tech without an illegal part being found does not means all the parts on the car are legal. All it means is that tech did not find anything illegal. It also doesn't mean you can't get penalized later when the illegal part is discovered.
Originally Posted by winders
Post #6 seems to contain a quote that was obviously false. Lamborghini used a restrictor that was previously banned. They didn't build a new one. It appears to have the correct diameter openings but has other features that allowed the cars using it to make a lot more power than they should have. IMSA didn't give it to them. This is why all the manufacturer points were taken away.

If Lamborghini had done nothing wrong here, all hell would breaking loose. Things are quiet because they know they got caught actually cheating.
Old 02-27-2016 | 05:35 PM
  #37  
Frank 993 C4S's Avatar
Frank 993 C4S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 904
From: NY Tri-State
Default

Just like the ST Honda Civic that got caught with illegal cams.



Quick Reply: The Lambos cheated!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:36 AM.