Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Do you think drones should be allowed at the track?
Yes, with a good set of guidelines.
54
40.00%
No, I don't want them.
61
45.19%
I think it needs to be studied more.
20
14.81%
Voters: 135. You may not vote on this poll

Drones at PCA events - Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2015, 09:51 AM
  #121  
Coochas
Rennlist Member
 
Coochas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 01776
Posts: 9,983
Received 472 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
Removing your passenger seat.
Harder to reach for beer if it's on the floor. The risk is that you have to loosen your belt and duck down to grab a brewski.
Old 04-06-2015, 10:49 PM
  #122  
analogmike
Rennlist Member
 
analogmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Danbury, CT, USA
Posts: 3,916
Received 103 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
It's all well and good until one accidentally ends up on track and in the path of cars...
Drones should be mandatory at Summit Point, they might scare the deer away from the track.

Besides, can't you guys in the US just bring a gun to shoot down the flying toys? ;-)
Guns are allowed everywhere in the USA because it's in the bible I think.
Old 04-06-2015, 11:39 PM
  #123  
car_slave
Pro
 
car_slave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drones are fun but there is no way that an event organizer will want to pay the extra liability cost. You can fly them if you pay $xxxxx. Who wants to pay more?

Old 04-13-2015, 03:46 PM
  #124  
TXE36
Drifting
 
TXE36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 2,943
Received 191 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

I know this tread has run its useful life, but couldn't resist:


Note the improvised tool used

-Mike
Old 04-13-2015, 05:55 PM
  #125  
captdownshift
Instructor
 
captdownshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do plan on getting a 3DR solo to experiment with automotive filming in a controlled environment in the near future. I'll report Vicki and others on the experience and results.
Old 03-22-2016, 10:28 PM
  #126  
David Borden
Rennlist Member
 
David Borden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: El Dorado CA
Posts: 317
Received 92 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake


There is a crash at a track event in there...
Wanted to bring this back to the top to continue the discussion as this just came up in our local chapter.

While entertaining, many of those failures make sense. Several of them are home built, something I am familiar with. These devices are very complex and tuning one to fly right is a big challenge, but something many enjoy. No different than RC plane flying with the exception of their complexity. Ive had a few of my home built quad fall out of the sky as well. I also didnt fly them over people or cars.

The guys that build them in the vast majority of cases are enthusiasts and understand the risks. You will rarely see one of these guys flying over or near people. They understand, while rare, **** happens as seen in that video.

Most of the other drones in the video are DJI phantoms which have a pretty poor rep in the enthusiast community because enough people with no common sense buy them and immediately take it out and fly it in the middle of a busy city like Manhattan, or over the heads of kids playing soccer. They have no training, and no understanding of the risks. When you take 100-200 hours to build one and hundred of hours on a forum, you start to learn of the risks and see the discussions on these issues.

Its not some who buy a ready to fly quad means to be a douche, in most cases they just dont know better. (Im not saying that anyone who buys a DJI phantom is irresponsible or all enthusiasts are)

Unfortunately, in most cases its the people with little to no experience who are ending up in the news.

This technology is very new and advancing very quickly. As mentioned in this thread, the controls are way more advanced now and can hop frequencies incredibly fast. They have flying events with hundreds of planes in the air at the same time,while there could be hundreds more on the ground testing their radios and there are no issues in most cases. If you know what to buy, that just not and issue any more.

Most of the good commercial drones have built in GPS that if your battery is low, you loose communication with your controller, or have other failures, they will go to a specific altitude and fly back to where they started and land with no user intervention. DJI phantoms have these features. Unfortunately, quads(4 motors and props) will fall out of the air if they break prop, lose a motor or ESC. DJI included... although thats pretty rare on the new stuff from what I understand.

Intel recently invested 60 million in a drone company Yuneec and they have built sonar and Real Sense technology into their latest offerings that will prevent the drone from flying into virtually anything. They have airport no-fly zones programmed into them as well which will not allow you to fly near an airport, even if you are ignorant to its location. They wont allow you to fly over the 400ft altitude mandated by the FAA. In addition, to all the safety features mentioned earlier, their new hex can lose a motor, prop, or ESC and still fly normally. Pretty incredible stuff. (full disclosure, I work for Intel but have nothing to do with drones or the investment the company made)

The reality is, given reasonable precautions, these are very safe when operated by skilled pilots. To say that someone with experience and a modern craft is creating an unsafe situation, if flown away from people is really ludicrous.

Especially an organization who sponsors racing cars. To say its OK to hurl our bodies in a tin cans 100+ mph 2ft off the bumper of another tin can knowing that tires blow out, oil lines burst, engines seize and people make mistakes... but ruling out the safe use of a device used for aerial photography is comical.

Can anyone state with a straight face, that racing is less risk to injury than a couple lb drone 100ft up and 200ft back from people and cars when operated by someone who knows the risks and practices care?

Back to the reason I made this post. I offered to do some aerial photography and video of a upcoming PCA event. I offered this free of charge just to support the club and provide some cool perspectives on the event. I would be using a craft that has all the modern built in redundancies including the ability to lose a motor or prop and still fly. We would have had an agreed upon plan ahead of time, including a discussion on where it was safe to fly. Including the use of a spotter when the craft was in the air. I am a hobbyist only.

Apparently many thought it was a great idea until someone piped up and said drones can not be operated at PCA events! Apparently its the rules and they have been passed down by the mother-ship. No adult discussion, no debate...

Sad.

David
Old 03-23-2016, 10:24 AM
  #127  
Der ABT
Burning Brakes
 
Der ABT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,046
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Yeh pretty sure it was the insurance carrier that made it no need for a discussion or vote
Old 03-23-2016, 11:56 AM
  #128  
LuigiVampa
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
LuigiVampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: PCA Gulag
Posts: 14,970
Received 4,393 Likes on 1,929 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Der ABT
Yeh pretty sure it was the insurance carrier that made it no need for a discussion or vote
I had direct contact with PCA regarding the ability to allow drones at the track and tried to negotiate a frame work to let it happen.

The issue was mainly driven by insurance but there was a very vocal group of people that felt that if you want to do anything but drive a car at the track you must be some kind of joker and have no place being their.

There was one particular guy from Zone 1 in Canada writing me hate emails telling me I needed to find a new hobby. The guy was such a jackass I really hope I never meet him face to face and thereafter get banned from PCA events. He was a real demeaning SOB.

I think most drivers feel that being on track is only part of the fun of being at the track. Interaction with people, maybe having a cookout, or just joking around, is also an important part of being at the track - at least for me. When I am strapped into my car their isn't someone more serious than me. But out of the car, well, I'm here to have fun, because I sure as hell am not getting paid.

The only arguments I understand, and agree with, are safety and liability. I tried to negotiate both ideas, but to no avail. While I wish we could have put some framework in place to allow responsible people to fly drones, under an extremely tight set of rules, it was not to be. And I don't think it will ever happen.
Old 03-23-2016, 12:12 PM
  #129  
Astroman
Rennlist Member
 
Astroman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,997
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I didn't think it was a big deal (flying drones at the track) until I saw this poor guy nearly taken out:

Old 03-23-2016, 02:12 PM
  #130  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

absolutely allow them with guidelines! the video is really interesting and boosts the popularity of the sport for those that view these videos. I also think that after the last car has left the track, they should be able to fly around the track , just as we usually do with walk arounds (or bike arounds at some tracks)

Ive been flying a drone with my son for a year now and, the thing has amazing capability to return to home if signal is lost, and seems to not have any safety issues. (i have a ton of RC flying experience too and this is a totally automated type of flying! seems very safe )
Old 03-23-2016, 02:13 PM
  #131  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

that was insane!!!!! thats a reason to not have them on the racing circuit during a race!!
Originally Posted by Astroman
I didn't think it was a big deal (flying drones at the track) until I saw this poor guy nearly taken out:

Drone crash on live TV at Ski World Cup - Italy ツ - YouTube
Old 03-23-2016, 02:21 PM
  #132  
Der ABT
Burning Brakes
 
Der ABT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,046
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I agree they offer some great views and publicity....who doesn't like seeing their car from outside?.

With enough rules I'd be comfortable with themmm...only in low speed sections etc to minimize risk...but then we would either need someone to enforce or to give out passes and police it...raising cost to regions possibly....

I mean if it was on a tether to prevent it from entering the track....no issue at all by me

Guy with issue from canada...maybe a drone pilot took his wife away?
Old 03-23-2016, 02:41 PM
  #133  
David Borden
Rennlist Member
 
David Borden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: El Dorado CA
Posts: 317
Received 92 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Astroman
I didn't think it was a big deal (flying drones at the track) until I saw this poor guy nearly taken out:

Drone crash on live TV at Ski World Cup - Italy ツ - YouTube
Yeah agreed... IF someone thinks its OK to fly right above someones head or car... not smart.

Do you feel its dangerous if a pre-vetted well trained operator was flying 100ft off the side of the track and getting some really great videos and shots of your car?

There was one particular guy from Zone 1 in Canada writing me hate emails telling me I needed to find a new hobby. The guy was such a jackass I really hope I never meet him face to face and thereafter get banned from PCA events. He was a real demeaning SOB.
I have little patience for the hubris and ego that some people have when it comes to organized clubs. Seems they are mostly interested in proving their point, vs. doing what makes sense.

David
Old 03-23-2016, 02:44 PM
  #134  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,596
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LuigiVampa
There was one particular guy from Zone 1 in Canada writing me hate emails telling me I needed to find a new hobby. The guy was such a jackass I really hope I never meet him face to face and thereafter get banned from PCA events. He was a real demeaning SOB.
I've never even been to Canada....
Just wanted to get that out there.

Last edited by Gary R.; 03-23-2016 at 04:12 PM.
Old 03-23-2016, 09:07 PM
  #135  
Cory M
Drifting
 
Cory M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,456
Received 74 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Borden
Yeah agreed... IF someone thinks its OK to fly right above someones head or car... not smart.

Do you feel its dangerous if a pre-vetted well trained operator was flying 100ft off the side of the track and getting some really great videos and shots of your car?

I have little patience for the hubris and ego that some people have when it comes to organized clubs. Seems they are mostly interested in proving their point, vs. doing what makes sense.

David
I don't have a dog in this fight, and I get what you are saying but... Who wants to decide what aircraft is safe and qualify the operators? Are they qualified to make that call? Who wants to monitor drone pilots during the event to make sure they are operating safely at the specified times and distances? What's in it for the club leaders? A few videos? What's the risk and liability?

The people in the decision making positions in these clubs have enough to worry about without throwing drones into the mix. I imagine they are car enthusiasts and got involved because they love motorsport, not to make decisions about drones at the track. The benefit of cool video angles may not be worth the risks to them. Why deal with it if you can just say no? I think for most people it's not a hatred or fear of drones, it's just another potential headache to deal with when you are trying to run an event. A potential headache you can easily opt out of.

I think I'm a pretty good swimmer, but the people at the hotel won't let me use the pool after 9pm. I told them I use only wear the best swim trunks, I have taken swim lessons, they are welcome to test my swimming abilities, and I promised not to run by the pool. They still won't let me.... Again what's in it for them?

It seems to me that the most effective way to get some kind of drone initiative approved would be for drone enthusiasts to volunteer for leadership positions in the clubs and over time demonstrate how drones can be used safely and the benefits of having them around. Edit a bunch of cool videos and show them to the other club leaders. At the end of the day it's just people making a judgement call. Busy people who like cars and don't care about drones...


Quick Reply: Drones at PCA events - Poll



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:20 PM.