On Track Financial Responsibility
#61
Race Car
It's a bit different up here.
We don't sue people as it appears to be a regular thing in the U.S.
It is a race track no matter what they call the event. And you are on your own for what happens.
We don't sue people as it appears to be a regular thing in the U.S.
It is a race track no matter what they call the event. And you are on your own for what happens.
#62
Rennlist Member
What happens if you're at Summit Point and a deer runs out in front of you and it takes out the whole front of the car. Do you expect to make the deer pay because it was his fault?
Remember to look over as I'm passing you. I'm a deer driving in the other car, but with a helmet on. You don't always know what I'm going to do.
Like others have said, anything can happen. It's up to you to be prepared to pay for the consequences, whether it's property or bodily damage.
Remember to look over as I'm passing you. I'm a deer driving in the other car, but with a helmet on. You don't always know what I'm going to do.
Like others have said, anything can happen. It's up to you to be prepared to pay for the consequences, whether it's property or bodily damage.
#63
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On Rennlist, apparently
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
18 Posts
Usually, if you are engaging in what is perceived as a dangerous activity (better) when you apply for the policy, you will be charged a higher rate and/or have a limitation or exclusion placed on the policy.
If you don't see such exclusions, then you should be good. But rad the policy and get advice.
I'm not a life insurance guy; usually Marc (mhm993), who is, will weigh in.
#64
Rennlist Member
The general answer is you're covered for a "track death" if you take up driving after you purchase insurance (I think that's the question).
You're responsible to answer the questions truthfully when applying for life insurance. They ask and may investigate your hazardous hobbies or health, by example.
If your health or hobbies change after the policy was issued, you're covered. As long as you pay the premiums in a timely manner, you're never asked the underwriting questions again, and have no responsibility to notify of changes.
If you were healthy at time of application and become hypertensive and subsequently die of a stroke, they cover you. Same, if you take up motor sports after the policy is issued, and then die, they cover you.
Individual policies don't currently have an exclusion for hazardous avocation claims, to my experience. Of course, if you already participate in a hazardous hobby at time of application, you must disclose, and occassionally may be subject to a higher premium.
Of course, this is a generic answer on a public forum and YMMV.
#65
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
There are a few life insurance companies that advertise they have policies for people who race. I have no idea how much they add to the premium for it, but they exist.
#67
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#68
Btwyx, it was a joint Track Masters Racing and Speed Ventures event. I have been to their events before, and they are generally well run albeit casual. They expect the advanced groups (open passing) to know what they are doing, which I guess did not happen.
There were a bunch of SE30, Spec Miata and other race cars there, as they ran a race in the afternoon, and a lot of the guys were getting some extra time. However, IMO, that does not excuse car to car contact at a DE. I don't think there was any contact during the race, however.
There were a bunch of SE30, Spec Miata and other race cars there, as they ran a race in the afternoon, and a lot of the guys were getting some extra time. However, IMO, that does not excuse car to car contact at a DE. I don't think there was any contact during the race, however.
#69
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trackmasters are generally quite reasonable in my experience, though as you say a bit casual. I wasn't fond of Speed Ventures when we tried them, having time trails in all groups (down to low intermediate) seemed like a very bad idea.
#70
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#71
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
The previously mentioned weekend at Sears Pt was pretty brutal.
There were 2 car-car contact events and lots of $$$ of damage there as well as a handful of those who did agricultural experiments which looked to be very expensive.
I disagree on your points above for DE. In racing no $ changes hands, but in DE if you think you are a hero and want to dive bomb me in a corner and hit me, you better be ready to cough up the dough to fix my car or I'm coming after you.
There were 2 car-car contact events and lots of $$$ of damage there as well as a handful of those who did agricultural experiments which looked to be very expensive.
I disagree on your points above for DE. In racing no $ changes hands, but in DE if you think you are a hero and want to dive bomb me in a corner and hit me, you better be ready to cough up the dough to fix my car or I'm coming after you.
If you are driving stupidly/aggressively enough in a DE to clip someone else and somehow don't think you should (a) pay for your mistake (b) offer in some way to offset the loss you have created (even if you cant afford to totally fix the carbon whatever) you don't belong in a DE. My point of coughing up dough doesn't need to be cash it can be time (help fix the car, offer to in some way offset the issue you caused), or something else.
All contact incidents I have ever seen where one person clearly did something stupid, the other party has gone right to the other person and offered to pay/help/offset the issue they caused.
Its a DE not a race, contact shouldn't happen and if it does then you should man up and fix the problem you caused (if its a clear at fault issue). The waiver protects legal issues, this is an honorability issue.
All contact incidents I have ever seen where one person clearly did something stupid, the other party has gone right to the other person and offered to pay/help/offset the issue they caused.
Its a DE not a race, contact shouldn't happen and if it does then you should man up and fix the problem you caused (if its a clear at fault issue). The waiver protects legal issues, this is an honorability issue.
many ppl LOVES open passing. i drive in open group and also races. but i NEVER pass anyone in open group unless i know who u are and how well you drive or i get a very very clear signal otherwise i will just hang on your bumper. b/c the OTHER guy can very well be blind. really, a spec miata drove me off the striahgt b/n T8 and 9 at THill years ago and totalled a $100k GT3 race car. no he didn't pay. and i made a mistake too. i should have held the line and let him bounce off my fender rather than drive myself of the ditch and fly over the wall. when taking a car to track, you should expect that that money/car is already gone. otherwise, this is not a sport for you.
and most importantly pls do not kid yourself, DE or racing. if you havent' hit something, you will.
if you already hit something, you will hit again, and again.....
oh, if you mean by after the incident,the ppl involved shoudl come together and discuss and offer some labor help or simply say "sorry, man, i fkd up" yes, that's absolutely gentleman act. i would be pleased if the dude who hit me actually came to see me or the car aftewards.... i would nt have asked for money. but little acknowledgment would be fine. and that should be mandatory; not the financial thing.
#72
Race Car
I've run some DE events with a few groups in Nor Cal and had never heard anything like that said in a driver's meeting either. I didn't think our area of the country had lost its marbles in this regard. Thank you for confirming it!
#73
Rennlist Member
As someone who got dive bombed and collected last year, I can say this with certainty. Sometimes you can't get out of the way. The guy passed the car behind me, then couldn't make the turn. I "felt" his presence and straightened the car up, hoping he'd either hold the inside line or straighten up and shoot in front of me. Neither bit happened. Situational awareness is necessary on the part of everyone on track, but assuming that everyone else is going to get out of your way when you do something stupid is ridiculous.
You shouldn't dive bomb anyone in a HPDE or even TT. It simply isn't appropriate. If you're doing something that stupid, you need to have an attitude check done before you head out on track.
You shouldn't dive bomb anyone in a HPDE or even TT. It simply isn't appropriate. If you're doing something that stupid, you need to have an attitude check done before you head out on track.
#74
Moody, bmwcc used to (I have not run with them for awhile) as did Your Private track Day. I have not heard Speed Ventures or TMR say that.
Does that make it binding? Certainly not but does set an expectation and expected etiquette.
Does that make it binding? Certainly not but does set an expectation and expected etiquette.
#75
Rennlist Member
Car to car contact during a DE should never be tolerated. DE is not a race and passing situations should always leave lots of room and lots of outs. DE is not a place where we can let egos go un checked. I think to many drivers today are more about speed then actual honing their technique. Cars are more capable today than 80% of the drivers because they are trying to drive too fast to soon. Learn the proper line first , learn the technique etc. let the speed develop naturally.
As for Liability issues . There is an inherent risk when you drive on the track. We sign hold harmlessness to prevent cross suits between drivers, instructors, clubs, track. Unfortunately they are only as good as the judges that read them. While they are very few and far between they have happened. As mentioned there are some insurance carriers with broader liability language then others. Chubb as someone suggested might pick up defense . Not guaranteed but they do have some of the broadest coverage available, Remember every state has different wording in their policies. Always ask you particular insurance agent.
I can tell you single car incidents do happen and unfortunately more then we think. In order for programs like mine and my competitor to survive we all must work together to make DE safer. Let’s face it HPDE is a big money maker for some clubs .If the ability to purchase physical damage coverage was not available there might be a lot less people willing to risk the vehicles.
Ok I said my piece sorry but before I even started the HPDE program my pet peeve was trying to get drivers and instructors to stop equating speed in DE to skill. Speed most of the time equates to just driving further over one’s head. Speed should be an end product and not the main ingredient.
As for Liability issues . There is an inherent risk when you drive on the track. We sign hold harmlessness to prevent cross suits between drivers, instructors, clubs, track. Unfortunately they are only as good as the judges that read them. While they are very few and far between they have happened. As mentioned there are some insurance carriers with broader liability language then others. Chubb as someone suggested might pick up defense . Not guaranteed but they do have some of the broadest coverage available, Remember every state has different wording in their policies. Always ask you particular insurance agent.
I can tell you single car incidents do happen and unfortunately more then we think. In order for programs like mine and my competitor to survive we all must work together to make DE safer. Let’s face it HPDE is a big money maker for some clubs .If the ability to purchase physical damage coverage was not available there might be a lot less people willing to risk the vehicles.
Ok I said my piece sorry but before I even started the HPDE program my pet peeve was trying to get drivers and instructors to stop equating speed in DE to skill. Speed most of the time equates to just driving further over one’s head. Speed should be an end product and not the main ingredient.