Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Corner Balance #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2012, 04:24 PM
  #1  
NVRANUF
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
NVRANUF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In a van down by the Ottawa River ...
Posts: 4,132
Received 460 Likes on 257 Posts
Default Corner Balance #'s

I just had my GT3 corner balanced and the tech came up with this as an end result... Is it a good start? He used ~230lb weight in the driver's seat.



Old 04-09-2012, 05:15 PM
  #2  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1Gunner
I just had my GT3 corner balanced and the tech came up with this as an end result... Is it a good start? He used ~230lb weight in the driver's seat.



Your numbers look fine. Here are my 996 GT3 numbers. Interesting that we are almost 100 lbs dead apart (me= lighter).

FL: 674 FR: 648
RL: 1071 RR: 1001
Cross: 1675 (49.35%)| 1719 (50.6%)
[Cross weight is 44 lbs off]
3394 lbs total

-td
Old 04-09-2012, 09:54 PM
  #3  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

3500lbs with you guys in the car??? porkey!

looks good for heavy set cars cross weights are the most important and your front to back is not that bad for a rear engined car at all.

a good set of tires and that weight might not even feel like its there!
Old 04-09-2012, 10:08 PM
  #4  
NVRANUF
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
NVRANUF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In a van down by the Ottawa River ...
Posts: 4,132
Received 460 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
3500lbs with you guys in the car??? porkey!

looks good for heavy set cars cross weights are the most important and your front to back is not that bad for a rear engined car at all.

a good set of tires and that weight might not even feel like its there!
6'5" and 225-230lbs, not so porky (...or "porkey" if my spelling sucked ), but thanks for the rest of the feedback Sir!

Old 04-10-2012, 01:00 PM
  #5  
Adam@Autometrics
Former Vendor
 
Adam@Autometrics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are a few strategies for corner balancing; all are a compromise. Equal diagonals is a very reasonable method for corner balancing.
Old 04-10-2012, 01:08 PM
  #6  
fatbillybob
Drifting
 
fatbillybob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,088
Received 128 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam@Autometrics
There are a few strategies for corner balancing; all are a compromise. Equal diagonals is a very reasonable method for corner balancing.
I only know about trying to go for 50/50 cross. Can you tell us about some other strategies and what those strategies try and accomplish? when for example is is better to lighten up on the ideal 50/50 cross and equalized the weights on the LF and RF corner for example or equalize the rears?
Old 04-10-2012, 01:11 PM
  #7  
JoeMag
Rennlist Member
 
JoeMag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Adam -- What are some of the other strategies and compromises?

...I had always thought the idea was the split the cars weight amougst the wheels as evenly as possible. Personally I don't like to think of cross % when I do it. I just calcluate what a corners weight should be and adjust from there -- example: left side of car weighs 51.3% of total weight, front weighs 42.1% of total weight so Left-Front should bear total weight X 51.3% X 42.1%
Old 04-10-2012, 01:13 PM
  #8  
JoeMag
Rennlist Member
 
JoeMag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

ha... two people typing same comment at same time!
Old 04-10-2012, 02:29 PM
  #9  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,472
Received 762 Likes on 385 Posts
Default

Getting cross weights the same leaves you with a car that will behave the same in left and right hand corners. This is the method most of the tuners I am familiar with use.

Some tuners like to get the weight on the front tires the same. The idea being that maximum braking can be achieved since both front tires will be equally loaded. Since, under braking, load transfers to the front through the cg which is usually offset the vehicle center line, this does not always workout as expected.

Oval racing has its own requirements that I know little to nothing about.

Scott
Old 04-10-2012, 04:14 PM
  #10  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,519
Received 1,729 Likes on 916 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMag
ha... two people typing same comment at same time!
Sorry for the OT, but that's a nice looking car in your avatar. Back to topic...
Old 04-10-2012, 05:03 PM
  #11  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

if you post the actual weights, i can help you with what direction to go with optimizing. you can still keep cross weights even, but optimize left to right weights. the trade offs happen when you raise and lower diagnal shock and body height. as you raise a corner, you increase pressure on that corner. (its weight goes up). you lower the opposing corner, and that weght goes down. in the end, you get the side to side weights in order. however, its not that easy because you are changing other things too.
but, for small changes, the concepts will work to being an out of balance car, in balance. 50 50 cornerweights dont do you much good, if you have a 100lb heavier corner. what i described will help you fix that kind of issue. then, the limits become what the ride height looks like too. all a delicate balance.
Old 04-10-2012, 05:32 PM
  #12  
analogmike
Rennlist Member
 
analogmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Danbury, CT, USA
Posts: 3,910
Received 99 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMag
Adam -- What are some of the other strategies and compromises?

...I had always thought the idea was the split the cars weight amougst the wheels as evenly as possible. Personally I don't like to think of cross % when I do it. I just calcluate what a corners weight should be and adjust from there -- example: left side of car weighs 51.3% of total weight, front weighs 42.1% of total weight so Left-Front should bear total weight X 51.3% X 42.1%
That is the correct way but it takes math and Americans hate math. Cross weights are perfect if your car is equal front and rear, or left and right, but few cars are. Otherwise cross weights are close enough to the calculated numbers using percentages. Just think how many cars crash and their wheels are not even pointed straight and they still go pretty fast!

An article I wrote YEARS ago with the calculations and more info:

http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarti...nment_tips.htm
Old 04-10-2012, 06:02 PM
  #13  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Just for comparison sake, I corner balanced my 944 the other day and came up with:

Front left: 680.8; front right: 644.8; rear left: 695.2; rear right: 656.4; total: 2,677.2

That's 50/50 front/back and 51/49 left/right.
Old 04-10-2012, 06:08 PM
  #14  
f1rocks
Three Wheelin'
 
f1rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Van
total: 2,677.2
.
But you're 76 pounds heavy!!
Old 04-10-2012, 06:12 PM
  #15  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,472
Received 762 Likes on 385 Posts
Default

Here is a good article:

http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/art...orner-weights/

Scott


Quick Reply: Corner Balance #'s



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:10 AM.