Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PORSCHE-BEST RACING CAR IN HISTORY?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2011, 09:48 PM
  #31  
racing916
Racer
 
racing916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mazda gives more support to club racers and to other groups because the cars are relatively cheap to own and race compared to a Porsche. The shear number of Mazda's sold compared to Porsche's also gives them the bank account to support smaller race teams and promote there brand. Porsches are expensive to race and buy compared to a new Miata.

Tom Burdge thank you for also agreeing with me about the 914's history they have been such successful platforms for racing. I love how Porsche loves to tout that the production value of their mid engine boxster and cayman, and how they come from the 550 spyder and not the 914. Porsche loves to forget the red headed step childs.
Old 10-20-2011, 02:22 AM
  #32  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Porsche may have been the "best" but I am not so sure it is a title to which they are current , and that they may not hold in the future. Sure you can look back 30 years , but pretty soon that does not hold water if you arent winning now.

There are quite a few things that Porsche could do at the club and other levels. They just dont do it. Same in their production road cars.

Look at Datsun and Nissan. Datsun got a lot of the name of the marque through its racing. They backed it up with reasonable cars in the showroom. It all dwindled, Of course the car became more and more of a luxury car and the price followed until eventually they sold only a couple of thousand 300's and the party was over. Then , what maybe 10 years later , they return with one of what brought them like the 350 and 370's. But by then the dealers were to pushing the $40,000 Maxima, or a $30,000 Altima or whatever.

I watched the Pirelli race the other day and there was one 370 Nismo in the field. What a pitiful effort. Sure a Porsche won on that track. But there was much much more effort from Ford and even from Acura.

Sure there are always a handful of the most upscale buyers for something like the GT3. I am glad. But my dealer here in Houston says that without the Cayenne and the Panamera they would not have the lights on to sell the other cars when a buyer for one of the cars shows up. There are only 4 million folks here in the area.

Porsche better think about breathing some life into this one day soon or some other manufacturer will, like Hyundai maybe. Porsche made some money on currency swaps, on shorting VW shares, and on selling to the Mid East and China. But they might have to get busy again yet as the base is not what it was.

Last edited by TexasRider; 10-20-2011 at 02:39 AM.
Old 10-20-2011, 07:11 AM
  #33  
avader906
Instructor
 
avader906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TexasRider
Porsche made some money on currency swaps, on shorting VW shares, and on selling to the Mid East and China. But they might have to get busy again yet as the base is not what it was.
they accumulated VW stake synthetically through OTC calls few knew about but then got killed once all revealed.... +1 on the base not what it was.
Old 10-20-2011, 03:27 PM
  #34  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Their move was likely more political in nature but if they had some puts in there and I think I remember they cash settled the shorters. Maybe it was profit, and if it is profit ok with me.

But my larger point is that while all of that is a corporate thing, they still arent making the money selling the cars. I realize it is a tough market, but I still say they are losing focus and base.

If not for the Cayenne there might not be any Porsche now. A sombering thought really. While I am glad the Cayenne is there, it speaks as to what is going on in the sports car line of Porsche.
Old 10-20-2011, 05:37 PM
  #35  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,970
Received 350 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TexasRider
Their move was likely more political in nature but if they had some puts in there and I think I remember they cash settled the shorters. Maybe it was profit, and if it is profit ok with me.

But my larger point is that while all of that is a corporate thing, they still arent making the money selling the cars. I realize it is a tough market, but I still say they are losing focus and base.

If not for the Cayenne there might not be any Porsche now. A sombering thought really. While I am glad the Cayenne is there, it speaks as to what is going on in the sports car line of Porsche.
As I agree with some of the opinions here,I can't agree with this whole idea being developed about a dark Porsche future,in motorsport or in the direction Porsche is heading.
I don't work for Porsche,even though I guess that would be a dream job,but I think they had to adapt to current conditions. For example,who would've thought 10 years ago,when the Japaneese were starting to brag about their future hybrid cars,that Porsche will follow.... But they had no choice and I believe that Porsche's technology will lead the hybrid racing market.Just look at the GT3 R Hybrid,this car was just a few hours from winning the 24 hours Nurburgring,after leading for hours without a problem,just an unfortunate malfunction made it abandon the race.
Also the 918 Spyder is looking like a masterpiece.
So I believe that Porsche will continue being in the lead for many years to come,the only thing is that the competitors are getting tougher and tougher and Porsche will have to step up their game.
Old 10-23-2011, 11:48 PM
  #36  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,970
Received 350 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

WOW!!!
Old 10-24-2011, 12:27 AM
  #37  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,970
Received 350 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

Laguna Seca 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1Ma6...ayer_embedded#!
Old 11-25-2011, 10:12 AM
  #38  
chfrank
Advanced
 
chfrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 54
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default teeners get no respect

I think that the 914's more than hold their own against the 911's. These cars were harmed only by their association with VW. Still they can keep up 911's even with 4 cylinders. Here is an example of 914's vs 911's at the Rennsport Reunion. http://youtu.be/RvTHJQcKzqQ

enjoy
Old 11-25-2011, 05:31 PM
  #39  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

The surprising thing about the 956/962 is how easy they are to drive, relative to many other race cars.





Old 11-26-2011, 10:01 AM
  #40  
Alan G.
Pro
 
Alan G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stanfordville NY
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default This thread was a drifter

Back to the original question. My original response was the 962. That car won the top spot consistantly for a long time. The 917s were fast, but they were too dangerous from a time when drivers seemed almost disposable. From a driver's perspective the 962 was in another league in driver survivability but, its got to be the 911 for 40+ years of racing.

The Mazda GT3 is second.
Old 01-08-2012, 11:36 PM
  #41  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,970
Received 350 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan G.
Back to the original question. My original response was the 962. That car won the top spot consistantly for a long time. The 917s were fast, but they were too dangerous from a time when drivers seemed almost disposable. From a driver's perspective the 962 was in another league in driver survivability but, its got to be the 911 for 40+ years of racing.

The Mazda GT3 is second.
That's what I thought!
Old 01-10-2012, 08:24 PM
  #42  
CAM14
Instructor
 
CAM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personal opinion, I just think it is cool that Mazda are even in this conversation.

At the higher end of US amateur endurance racing, the 25 hours of Thunderhill stands out as a bench mark event. The past several years a very well organized team with great drivers has taken a Porsche at the overall winner in that event. But to Mazda credit, here is a quote from http://www.nasa25hour.com/ “Four of the five classes that took the checker were won by a Mazda Miata or MX-5. Ten of the possible 18 podium positions were held by Mazda Miata or MX-5 competitors.”

So a conclusion one can derive from this thread is the Porsche has a racing pedigree that it should be very proud it and is still continuing it wining ways. But other makes also have a strong presents at the more grass roots level and Mazda currently has a strong showing. Whilst Mazda has a few notable highlights in professional racing (as well as BMW, Mercedes, Ferrari, Ford to name a few) Porsche still is the leader.

IMHO, would love to see DTM and BTCC open up to the likes of Porsche and Mazda.



Quick Reply: PORSCHE-BEST RACING CAR IN HISTORY?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:37 AM.