Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hoosier R6 vs BFG R1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2011, 07:37 PM
  #31  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: All Ate Up With Motor
Posts: 41,847
Received 1,672 Likes on 863 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
The second, and not yet mentioned is car setup. Some "setups" will chew up and spit out tires, and others are very gentle on them.
Very true.
Old 03-08-2011, 08:40 PM
  #32  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onefastviking
Slicks are faster than DOT's.

Now in deciding when a particular tire falls off it's prime. Well that depends on a few things.
One being the compound, obviously a softer compound will fall off a little sooner.

Second, most drivers really aren't pushing the tires 100% and if you are not pushing it that hard then you will get more heat cycles before you really loose any time. This is why pro teams will discard tires after a few heat cycles and then others pick them up at a discount and feel that they have a lot of life left in them. As well, some of these drivers having never driven on the new stickers can relate to any difference.

Third, some people want a tire that is a 90 or 95% tire that will give them 90-95% of the stick of the best tire yet will last longer or be more consistent overall.
All true, but you forgot the net worth/annual income versus heat cycle replacement aphorism: the more money you make, the sooner your tires will need to be replaced.

Where's forklift with his graph??
Old 03-08-2011, 08:44 PM
  #33  
onefastviking
Race Car
 
onefastviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,549
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
All true, but you forgot the net worth versus heat cycle replacement graph. The more money you make, the sooner your tires will need to be replaced.

Where's forklift??

True, unlimited budget = stickers everytime !


Forklift ? ? ? IDK
Old 03-08-2011, 08:48 PM
  #34  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by onefastviking
True, unlimited budget = stickers everytime !


Forklift ? ? ? IDK
forklift here on Rennlist aka Jim Evans. He had that classic net worth vs. tire replacement graph as his avatar for quite a while. So true.
Old 03-09-2011, 12:06 AM
  #35  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Lol. How fast you go is directly proportional to the depth of those things on the side of your pants....
Old 03-09-2011, 12:40 PM
  #36  
John H
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
John H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Portsmouth, Ohio
Posts: 5,122
Received 69 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

So VR, any idea wheter the Hankooks would work well on a 993? It is pretty much maxed out for G stock, coilovers, monoballs etc...
Old 03-09-2011, 01:25 PM
  #37  
SG_M3
Rennlist Member
 
SG_M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 315
Received 10 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John H
So VR, any idea wheter the Hankooks would work well on a 993? It is pretty much maxed out for G stock, coilovers, monoballs etc...
Any tire will work on a chassis that is setup for them. Hoosiers and Hankooks are very similar, benefit being, the Hankook compound seems to be more consistant through a heat cycle than a Hoosier.

The key is to make the chassis work with that tire. I wouldn't run the same shock, swaybar, or even spring rate on a car with NT01's vs a Hoosier.
Old 03-09-2011, 01:27 PM
  #38  
forklift
Rennlist Member
 
forklift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 2,182
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I had to dig up my old laptop to find it. I got from another thread years ago. Pretty accurate!
Attached Images  
Old 03-09-2011, 02:22 PM
  #39  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: All Ate Up With Motor
Posts: 41,847
Received 1,672 Likes on 863 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John H
So VR, any idea wheter the Hankooks would work well on a 993? It is pretty much maxed out for G stock, coilovers, monoballs etc...
Sure, given the right set up. What are you currently using? Also, SG's points are valid.
Old 03-09-2011, 02:25 PM
  #40  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by forklift
I had to dig up my old laptop to find it. I got from another thread years ago. Pretty accurate!
it needs an adjustment axle to count number of concurrent mortgages, private schools and other nice stuff that makes life a living hell...
Old 03-09-2011, 04:21 PM
  #41  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by forklift
I had to dig up my old laptop to find it. I got from another thread years ago. Pretty accurate!
Thanks. It took a lot of research to make that.
Old 03-09-2011, 04:22 PM
  #42  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SG_M3
Any tire will work on a chassis that is setup for them. Hoosiers and Hankooks are very similar, benefit being, the Hankook compound seems to be more consistant through a heat cycle than a Hoosier.

The key is to make the chassis work with that tire. I wouldn't run the same shock, swaybar, or even spring rate on a car with NT01's vs a Hoosier.
How would you differ your setup between those 2 for example?
Old 03-09-2011, 04:23 PM
  #43  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
Thanks. It took a lot of research to make that.
Guess your surname would be Phillips then.
Old 03-09-2011, 05:04 PM
  #44  
Eifeler
Pro
 
Eifeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
So I got to try a set of Hoosier R6's...previously I had BFG R1's...I was a bit worried since I ran 245/45-16 all around on 8" wheels....and the Hoosiers were 225/50-16 in front and 245/45-16 in rear....but it worked out nicely....on the 8' rims you could hardly tell which tires were wider....

My impressions on track were quite a bit different than the R1's....the R1's were very much "velcro"....in other words once they start to slide (large slip angle) the available traction drops off a cliff....so it takes a serious correction and huge reduction of speed to save the slide.....but the Hoosiers are much more forgiving....they have near the peak traction of the R1's...but allow a much greater slip angle while still retaining good traction.... so I found them much easier to control vs the R1's..... My personal best lap times between the two are within .04 second...so its very close...but I just feel the Hoosiers are easier to drive....
Concur that breakaway at the limit can be sudden. I've stuck with the R1's because they have 235's and 255's in 17 while the closest Hoo has to offer is 225's and 245's. The next set will be the smaller Hoo's in hopes of finding a little more consistency.

Originally Posted by sig_a
Hoosiers run larger than R1's and others. Perhaps some of the performance difference is the R6's wider section width and tread given the same size in the R1's.
This isn't true across the board. I've been contemplating the switch from R1's to R6's for a while now and have compared several sizes side to side. For example: The R6 225/40 is healthy and only marginally smaller (maybe 1/16th) than the 235/40 R1. On the other hand, the R6 245/40 is significantly smaller (I believe 3/16ths) than the 255/40 R1.
Old 03-09-2011, 05:18 PM
  #45  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by forklift
I had to dig up my old laptop to find it. I got from another thread years ago. Pretty accurate!
GREAT....

According to this graph I SHOULD replace my tires WAY more often....but the reality of my marrige....I think I'm in the $25k bracket


Quick Reply: Hoosier R6 vs BFG R1



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:50 PM.