2011 Suburban 2500 Towing : Interested in experienced opinions
#49
Rennlist Member
#50
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The one ****ty thing I am learning about the 2011's: there has been some significant change in the emissions systems for 2011, and these are now OBD2 vehicles....and there is as yet no aftermarket for reliable engine flashes & higher capacity/lower restriction air clener assembles. Both made a big difference in my 2007 model (same body style/engine).
#53
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm looking all over for just the right used Suburban 2500. I found a 2004 2500 with only 51k miles, BUT it has the 6.0L motor, not the 8.1L. Has anyone towed with this combo? It is rated to 12k pounds, 325 HP and 369 pf of torque.
My trailer is about 6,500 lbs loaded.
My trailer is about 6,500 lbs loaded.
#54
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IMO only, the 6.0 in the previous body style Suburbans (up through 2006 model year) is not up for towing 12,000 pounds or even 8,000 pounds.. Your 6.500 pounds would be really pushing it in hilly terrain. The 8.1 is worth holding out for. The current body style 6.0 (the only engine available, unfortunately, due to emissions laws) is notably better.
#55
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I towed 7,000 with this combo with no problems, even in the mountains, but it had the optional 4.11 gear ratio.
#56
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In searching around the Internet for info on the various years, motors, transmissions, I came across this info that could be valuable to future readers of this post. Based on this info, I'm going to focus on finding a used 2008 -2010. Thanks everyone for your help!
"The 2006 6.0 Suburban had 335 hp and 375 tq. The 2007 6.0 Suburban had 352 hp and 383 tq. The 2006 and the 2007 both had the same 4 speed tranny... The 2007 should out pull the 2006.
BUT, if you want close to 20 mpg for gas mileage and the pulling power of the 8.1, buy the new 2008 with the 6 speed tranny."
"The 2006 6.0 Suburban had 335 hp and 375 tq. The 2007 6.0 Suburban had 352 hp and 383 tq. The 2006 and the 2007 both had the same 4 speed tranny... The 2007 should out pull the 2006.
BUT, if you want close to 20 mpg for gas mileage and the pulling power of the 8.1, buy the new 2008 with the 6 speed tranny."
#57
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In searching around the Internet for info on the various years, motors, transmissions, I came across this info that could be valuable to future readers of this post. Based on this info, I'm going to focus on finding a used 2008 -2010. Thanks everyone for your help!
"The 2006 6.0 Suburban had 335 hp and 375 tq. The 2007 6.0 Suburban had 352 hp and 383 tq. The 2006 and the 2007 both had the same 4 speed tranny... The 2007 should out pull the 2006.
BUT, if you want close to 20 mpg for gas mileage and the pulling power of the 8.1, buy the new 2008 with the 6 speed tranny."
"The 2006 6.0 Suburban had 335 hp and 375 tq. The 2007 6.0 Suburban had 352 hp and 383 tq. The 2006 and the 2007 both had the same 4 speed tranny... The 2007 should out pull the 2006.
BUT, if you want close to 20 mpg for gas mileage and the pulling power of the 8.1, buy the new 2008 with the 6 speed tranny."
#58
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've seen this thread go on for a while so I thought I would ask this question here:
I had a 2008 Denali and it had a great motor/trans set-up, but the suspension (air shocks in the rear esepcially) and brakes were sub-standard for towing my 7500lbs worth of enclosed trailer and gear. I have always wondered if anyone had ever installed the upgraded leaf-spring axles on a tahoe/yukon short wheelbase. I know it is a random question, but I thought I would ask the masses here if they had ever heard or seen of such a set-up.
I wish back when I bought the denali, we'd been smart and purchased the 2500 yukon instead as we loved the interior.
I had a 2008 Denali and it had a great motor/trans set-up, but the suspension (air shocks in the rear esepcially) and brakes were sub-standard for towing my 7500lbs worth of enclosed trailer and gear. I have always wondered if anyone had ever installed the upgraded leaf-spring axles on a tahoe/yukon short wheelbase. I know it is a random question, but I thought I would ask the masses here if they had ever heard or seen of such a set-up.
I wish back when I bought the denali, we'd been smart and purchased the 2500 yukon instead as we loved the interior.
#59
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
Rennlist Lifetime Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Problem solved! Seats my family of 6 very comfortably when needed, drives much better than my previous SuperDuty and tows my trailer like it isn't even there. Mileage has really improved...I got 21 on the highway coming back from Chicago last week and 16 towing to Michigan.
#60
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wise choice.
I also have a family of six and we love the truck. You must have one of the rare front bench models. Since you can't get the bench in the F150's, it is one of the excuses I used to justify the F250.
I also have a family of six and we love the truck. You must have one of the rare front bench models. Since you can't get the bench in the F150's, it is one of the excuses I used to justify the F250.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)