PCA or other ruling on 'windows', open, lexan ok?
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
PCA or other ruling on 'windows', open, lexan ok?
for a couple of reasons, one being an issue im having a bit with wind and a possible eye laser thing...i was thking of putting lexan side windows in my 2004 Boxster S , F class spec race car.
my cup car has lexan full windows, never had a problem at pca events or other etc.
but i usually just keep the windows rolled down in the boxster. obviously noone wants glass windows up. but if they were lexan would that be permissible under pca rules?
woudl they have to be afixed or could i jsut replace the up/down glass pieces??
anyone know an outfit that makes lexan windows for my application?
any thoughts or ideas are much appreciated!
my cup car has lexan full windows, never had a problem at pca events or other etc.
but i usually just keep the windows rolled down in the boxster. obviously noone wants glass windows up. but if they were lexan would that be permissible under pca rules?
woudl they have to be afixed or could i jsut replace the up/down glass pieces??
anyone know an outfit that makes lexan windows for my application?
any thoughts or ideas are much appreciated!
#3
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
close the face shield on your helmet. that works well for me (issues with contact lenses otherwise)
Lexan windows are not legal in stock class in PCA club racing
Lexan windows are not legal in stock class in PCA club racing
#4
Rennlist Member
Trending Topics
#8
Mr. Excitement
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
+1 on close your visor.
#11
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For all you comedians out there, the reason lexan windshields were originally allowed in stock class was safety, not because the rules chair already had one, as the rules chair in place at that time did not race.
lexan windows aren't necessarily any more safe than glass ones, especially if the glass ones aren't up.
This racer is proposing that he be allowed to run windows up. It doesn't matter whether the windows are lexan or glass if they are going to be up, at least in terms of competitive balance, since inherently a car running with its windows up will be more aerodynamic and have an advantage.
with that said, the reason most sanctioning bodies require windows to be down is for extracation, if there is a wreck and the car is on fire. And, yes, PCA club racing allows windows in factory cup cars, because they were delivered that way. Frankly, most cornerworkers and EV crews aren't wild about dealing with a lexan factory installed window if the car wrecks and is on fire.
With regard to remote reservoir shocks, the current rules committee would not have allowed those, if the members had been presented with a proposal for that change and frankly, it was a mistake allowing them in stock class. With that said, to now "outlaw" them would result in a number of racers having to remove them or move up a class. The rules committee does not want to make any change to the rules that result in a significant expense to racers just to stay competitive.
lexan windows aren't necessarily any more safe than glass ones, especially if the glass ones aren't up.
This racer is proposing that he be allowed to run windows up. It doesn't matter whether the windows are lexan or glass if they are going to be up, at least in terms of competitive balance, since inherently a car running with its windows up will be more aerodynamic and have an advantage.
with that said, the reason most sanctioning bodies require windows to be down is for extracation, if there is a wreck and the car is on fire. And, yes, PCA club racing allows windows in factory cup cars, because they were delivered that way. Frankly, most cornerworkers and EV crews aren't wild about dealing with a lexan factory installed window if the car wrecks and is on fire.
With regard to remote reservoir shocks, the current rules committee would not have allowed those, if the members had been presented with a proposal for that change and frankly, it was a mistake allowing them in stock class. With that said, to now "outlaw" them would result in a number of racers having to remove them or move up a class. The rules committee does not want to make any change to the rules that result in a significant expense to racers just to stay competitive.
#12
Rennlist Member
Regarding the comment of keeping expenses down. do you think they could implement an "actual" hp to wght ratio? That is the only reason I am not interested in racing pca. way to expensive to build the engines allowed in GT class. A dyno at the track would bring another level of compliance check and it seems to work really well at other venues.
#13
Drifting
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Malvern, Pa.
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love the non-informative answers "you don't want to go there... Many differing opinions..." and "You don't read the NASA forums, do you"
How about replying with some actual information?
How about replying with some actual information?