When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This isn't exactly what you're looking for, ut if you're already set up with a data logger, you can do your own my-car-in-the-real-world testing. I strapped a pair of $5 (used, ebay) sensors from a 1995 Lincoln Continental to my front and rear suspension pieces, and did some steady-speed tests (both directions to correct for wind) on a remote stretch of freeway near my house. I was able to see consistent and repeatable changes in ride height from as-small-as-4-degree changes in my wing setting. I packed up all my pieces, and tested them all one Saturday afternoon.
It works on the track, too.
That is STILL one of my all-time favourite threads, ever.
... The cantilever effect of too much rear wing was an interesting discovery, for me.
I thought that was common knowledge. If you tell me your axle weights, wheelbase, and horizontal distance from rear wheels to wing, then I'll tell you how much front lift you get per pound of rear downforce. Just algebra.
The sandbag picture took me back to testing my wing -- I used 350# of sand. It looked ridiculous, but it held (which wasn't bad for six pounds of aluminum and adhesive).
And I'm glad you liked that thread, jgrant. I still can't believe I had the spare time to do all of that, but I'm glad I did it. It was a lot of fun for a non-engineer type like myself.
Hey Jack,
I missed that whole adventure of yours on Pelican, so I was glad to catch it this pass.
Great stuff.
As I told Steve (Weiner) when i forwarded it to him to read,
"...gotta hand it to Jack for his curiosity, intuitiveness, and inventiveness."
Granted, your research methodology was affected by handmade equipment and some generalization;
but, your thought process was very linear. To that end, progress was made.
I would love to have seen the face on any CHP in the area as you blitzed between on-ramps!!..LOL!
I've been grappling with the same issue of trying to keep the nose down..it's not an easy nut.
The rear is anchored very nicely, which , as you pointed out, is exacerbating the front issue.
Going to review the two links you posted as well.
Thanks, Nick. No doubt there's a whole lot that's less-than-rigorous in my testing, but -- as a guy who stopped his hard science in freshman year's 'Physics for Poets' -- I appreciate the compliment. It was interesting to take a real-world look at those pieces and modify them based on a repeatable (if not fantastically precise) testing regimen.
I was lucky with the CHP. At a few points, I think they could have easily cited me for reckless ridiculousness:
The tuft test picture is on the 10 Freeway here in Los Angeles, a fairly busy stretch of road. At one point I'd worked up an air-pressurized 'confetti cannon' to shoot sparkly glitter in front of the wing so that I could photograph how the air was flowing over it at freeway speeds.
I'm still amazed I never the cops never pulled me over.
Do you mind telling us the backstory behind this? I've been puzzling over it since I saw it. I realize they're trying to simulate aero load but why w/ bags of top soil? Did they not run on a 7-post rig previously? Or have the suspension geometry all mapped out? It looks like a Rennlist, club-racing level science project, rather than a Champcar-level science project.
Actually this was an exercise in load cell validation and calibration. It was done at the track where a shaker rig wasnt available, whereas a feed store was
Notice the zip-lock bags under each tire? Even with this weight on the thing, one could easily move the car side to side. Very easily.
Actually this was an exercise in load cell validation and calibration. It was done at the track where a shaker rig wasnt available, whereas a feed store was
Notice the zip-lock bags under each tire? Even with this weight on the thing, one could easily move the car side to side. Very easily.
Thanks Chris! Did you manage not to break open any of those bags? Was this at Firebird Raceway?
That is, without doubt, the COOLEST example I have yet seen of personal/vehicular exploration for a cause. The last shot of your drive down Hwy 10 makes me laugh in recognition of "the madness", but also makes me shake my head in awe. I most humbly submit that my hat is off...
Chris W.,
If that Image doesn't make it into the Motorsports Hall of Fame, I'll be sincerely disappointed. That's one of the greatest images I've seen on Rennlist.
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.
Talos Takes Your 991 Porsche 911 GT3 to the Next Level for a Cool $1.13 Million
Slideshow: Talos Vehicles has transformed the Porsche 911 GT3 RS into a carbon-bodied, race-inspired machine that costs well over $1 million before the donor car is even included.
9 Vehicles Porsche Helped Engineer that Aren't Porsches
Slideshow: Long before engineering consulting became trendy, Porsche was quietly helping other automakers build everything from supercars to economy hatchbacks.
9 Features and Characteristics That Only Porsche People Understand
Slideshow: Some brands build cars. Porsche builds traditions, obsessions, and a few habits that stopped making sense decades ago but somehow became part of the charm.