Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944/924 VS 911.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2008, 12:10 AM
  #16  
Mike in Chi

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike in Chi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Flying Turtle Ranch
Posts: 12,321
Received 176 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rich Sandor
In general, I think it would be hard for a 944 or 924 to come close to an equally prepped 911 of the same vintage. Turbos notwithstanding.
check out the race results here

http://www.pca.org/clubrace/2008_results/index.htm
Old 09-19-2008, 12:12 AM
  #17  
Mike in Chi

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike in Chi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Flying Turtle Ranch
Posts: 12,321
Received 176 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2BWise
Otherwise I think the bigger issue is that the flat six is a far stronger motor. There is far more aftermarket support, but with the extra displacement it should have a better torque curve giving it an edge on the front engined cars.
See above
Old 09-19-2008, 12:46 AM
  #18  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Bill, I'm sure the 944 has a higher moment of inertia. I built these cars into a PC racing game a few years ago, and entered all the data to get the correct performance.

I remember the 944 had a higher moment of inertia, because it reminded me of doing the same calculations for airplanes when I was building them for MS Flight Sim.
Old 09-19-2008, 12:49 AM
  #19  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mike, can't argue with results, there are definately some fast 944t's and 944s2's on there... but most of the 2.5L 944 na's are nearer to the bottom...

I will admit that they are like 914s - slowmentum cars where you can't cover up your mistakes by powering out them!
Old 09-19-2008, 12:54 AM
  #20  
J richard
Rennlist Member
 
J richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,639
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

IMHO, and having both, I prefer the 911. I don't think you can take the whole experience apart peice by peice and talk about neutral handling of the 44,more power of the 911, etc... they are two very different experiences...and having way more seat time in 911's I like the tossablity of the 911, you attack a corner differently and I just like the driving style of the 911. In the right hands either can be fast, and its pretty common for the 944spec cars to run head to head with an sc...

For me, the 44 is an easier car to drive, the 911 is harder but more rewarding...
Old 09-19-2008, 02:29 AM
  #21  
onefastviking
Rennlist Member
 
onefastviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,549
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I guess I am just a car *****, last one I built was a 911 (ok,996) now I am building my old 944 into a faster classed 944, and I love them all !
Next comes a GT3 !
Old 09-19-2008, 06:29 AM
  #22  
87 944 C
Drifting
 
87 944 C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northwest NJ
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

inexperienced first time driver i think should use the 944, basically a lil more forgiving at it's limit, after time move into a 911
Old 09-19-2008, 08:05 AM
  #23  
smlporsche
Drifting
 
smlporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA & NC
Posts: 3,082
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

There is no correct answer to this question.
The cars are vastly different and each and it's own rewards.
Having said that let me share my bias...

The 944 is an easier car to drive as has been stated above BECAUSE it is a better initial platform, I just don't understand these people who think that a difficult to handle car is somehow better...
In an eqaul HP comparison the 944 (S2) will be very hard to beat with an equally prepared 911 (are there any 911 w/ about 210HP?). Most of the 911 I pass in a typical DE have considerably more HP than me and those that pass me usually have over 100HP more, not a fair comparison.
Old 09-19-2008, 08:47 AM
  #24  
ltc
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ltc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 29,323
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Why were 968's excluded from the question?

I had some fun times following a 968 Firehawk on the track, fantastic handling car IMHO.
Old 09-19-2008, 08:47 AM
  #25  
Rassel
Drifting
 
Rassel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,277
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

There is no answer to which car is quicker.
There is no answer to which car is better platform.

It's completely dependent to:
What models you're comparing?
What modifications are they having?
What do you use as a benchmark?

This can be discussed forever. People can point out differences that can some times contribute to an advantage to a single situation but it taking one thing out of the context is utterly pointless, nonetheless it seems to give some value as entertainment.

And finally, that was not the initial question either.
Regarding the threads starting point:

I've never raced a 944 equal to a factory race 911. So I can't give you a good comparison. I can at least say that a car that is easy to drive is not necessarily quicker. Otherwise we'd never drive on slicks.
Old 09-19-2008, 08:10 PM
  #26  
BostonDMD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BostonDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 7,030
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

OK......after reading all your kind responses I gathered that......
all things equal, it takes a better driver to drive a 911 as competitively as a 924/944 ( in the same class)......
......just because of the nature of the car or wheelbase.......
Am I right?
Old 09-19-2008, 08:19 PM
  #27  
MTosi
User
 
MTosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sterling, MA
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smlporsche
There is no correct answer to this question.
The cars are vastly different and each and it's own rewards.
Having said that let me share my bias...

The 944 is an easier car to drive as has been stated above BECAUSE it is a better initial platform, I just don't understand these people who think that a difficult to handle car is somehow better...
In an eqaul HP comparison the 944 (S2) will be very hard to beat with an equally prepared 911 (are there any 911 w/ about 210HP?). Most of the 911 I pass in a typical DE have considerably more HP than me and those that pass me usually have over 100HP more, not a fair comparison.
Your spot on, I've never been able to figure out that logic .

The 944 chassis is IMO one of the best of that era, its right up there balance wise with the E30 M3, both are front mid engine. The only reason 944NA's don't do better is they have no power, you can't make a fair comparison between cars that have 25-50-100hp differential.

Don't just take it from me, my dad raced both 911's and 944S2/Turbo's professionally and won in both. Yet he always held the 944 platform in much higher regard. It always bothered him that Porsche never put very much effort into the platform, since out of the dozens of production cars he raced of all makes, he always felt that it was one of the best.

Last edited by MTosi; 09-19-2008 at 08:38 PM.
Old 09-19-2008, 08:28 PM
  #28  
BostonDMD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BostonDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 7,030
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MTosi
Your spot on, I've never been able to figure out that logic .

The 944 chassis is IMO one of the best of that era, its right up there balance wise with the E30 M3, both are front mid engine.
Maybe I should get into a 944T and kick some serious culos in F class.....
Old 09-19-2008, 08:30 PM
  #29  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ltc
Why were 968's excluded from the question?

I had some fun times following a 968 Firehawk on the track, fantastic handling car IMHO.
I think a 968 vs 964C2 is pretty much the same comparison as a 2.5L 944 vs a 2.7L 911.
Old 09-19-2008, 08:32 PM
  #30  
MTosi
User
 
MTosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sterling, MA
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BostonDMD
OK......after reading all your kind responses I gathered that......
all things equal, it takes a better driver to drive a 911 as competitively as a 924/944 ( in the same class)......
......just because of the nature of the car or wheelbase.......
Am I right?
People can argue all day long about how it takes a "better driver" to be "competitive" in a 911, and although the 911 may be harder to get to 90% or whatever you like to call it, in reality the difficulty of getting to 100% has no relevance to whether your driving a 944, 911, Miata, Corvette, BMW or even a Yugo for that matter.....


Quick Reply: 944/924 VS 911.........



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:41 PM.