Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How accurate are these GPS G-Meters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2008, 07:05 PM
  #1  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default How accurate are these GPS G-Meters?

Edit - My AIM MXL is NOT GPS based, I was befuddled by the paperwork.. so solly.
I asked because my system shows me pulling up to 1.57 Lateral G's on top of the uphill and over 1.3G in most all the other corners at LRP, didn't think my car (or I) was capable of that? Funny how the left hander shows as negative G's.. just the opposite pull of course.

Last edited by Gary R.; 04-07-2008 at 10:54 PM.
Old 04-07-2008, 07:13 PM
  #2  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
I ask because i'm pulling up to 1.57 Lateral G's in West Bend at LRP, didn't think my car (or I) was capable of that?
Obviously not very.
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 04-07-2008, 07:15 PM
  #3  
AllanJ
Rennlist Member
 
AllanJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You have to ignore the instantaneous spikes in G-forces. Go by the average over a short range for better accuracy.

Cheers,
Old 04-07-2008, 07:20 PM
  #4  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Herman
Obviously not very.
Nice shot Larry!
Actually I was looking at segments and got the map twisted.. I corrected it above. In West bend it was a high of 1.3.
Old 04-07-2008, 09:40 PM
  #5  
Tom W
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Tom W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Which GPS based data system?

I've been using a Traqmate for a year and it shows that I pull up to 2.0 g's in the high speed turns and less (about 1.5) in the slower turns. I don't doubt the numbers given I should be getting a lot more downforce at higher speeds and am running pretty wide slicks. Once I get the software sorted out from the MoTeC, I'll be able to directly compare the Traqmate and the MoTeC data that I acquired a week ago.
Old 04-07-2008, 09:40 PM
  #6  
Circuit Motorsports
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

G meters are accurate if your car has zero body roll and the road is perfectly flat.

For every degree of body roll you have to subtract .111 G's. It doesn't take much body roll to make a big difference in the reading. A mere 5 degrees in body roll can account for a LOT of inaccuracy. This is assuming that if you turned your G sensor on it's side it would read 1G (the reading that 'gravity' would be).

For changes in the angle of the track I don't have the mathematical patience to figure out what you need to subtract/add depending on the angle of the track.

The G meter in your AIM system is not GPS based.
Old 04-07-2008, 10:14 PM
  #7  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Circuit Motorsports
The G meter in your AIM system is not GPS based.
Of course you are correct Joe, it is just part of the AIM MXL and has nothing to do with the GPS itself, yes? I was just curious about it but it isn't one of the important data points for me to look at right now anyway. I'm more concerned with braking, throttle application, speed and RPM.. here is an article on braking data I was just directed to by Jerry Austin, good info.

http://www.optimumg.com/documents/te...e_tech_tip.pdf

Last edited by Gary R.; 04-07-2008 at 10:55 PM.
Old 04-07-2008, 10:24 PM
  #8  
Circuit Motorsports
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
Of course you are correct Joe, it is just part of the AIM GPS Module and has nothing to do with the GPS itself, yes? I was just curious about it but it isn't one of the important data points for me to look at right now anyway. I'm more concerned with braking, throttle application, speed and RPM.. here is an article on braking data I was just directed to by Jerry Austin, good info.

http://www.optimumg.com/documents/te...e_tech_tip.pdf
The G sensor on the AIM MXL is in the dash unit itself. Part of the reason you want a good mouting system that is 'correct'.

Did you go with a brake pressure sensor or the on/off brake sensor?
Old 04-07-2008, 10:29 PM
  #9  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Circuit Motorsports
The G sensor on the AIM MXL is in the dash unit itself. Part of the reason you want a good mouting system that is 'correct'.

Did you go with a brake pressure sensor or the on/off brake sensor?
Ahh, got it.. It is mounted on a very strong plate on the column, 0 movement. I have the pressure sensor, which currently has a baseline of 500 PSI and I have hit just under 2000 PSI under hard braking. My Gas pedal sensor also needs to be re-zero'd as it starts at 55% and tops at 100%.

Here is a picture of me playing around with it..
Attached Images  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:31 AM
  #10  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Gary, ideally, if you use 1 g-sensor, you will want to place it at the CG of the car. Since you have a built in unit, it will be a compromise, however, 1.3g is not unusual for West Bend. My car with slicks is 1.7g through West Bend. If you install 2 g-force sensors, you'll put them on the wheel centerlines.
Old 04-08-2008, 08:38 AM
  #11  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Thanks Geoffrey. I'm amazed at all the different ways there are to look at the data and just how much data there is to look at now! Hopefully by next week end at Summit i'll have it pretty well squared away and get some good stuff to study. Right now my biggest question, believe it or not, is how to set a virtual S/F Beacon in the GPS at the track to get lap times, Forecasts, etc.!! The runs at Limerock are porked, whole runs are counted as a "lap".. I plan on calling AIM today but Roger C. and Jerry A. have been extremely helpful..
Old 04-08-2008, 08:42 AM
  #12  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I would use the beacon for lap timing. GPS is good for speed and relative position, but I think the beacon is more accurate for timing. Also, be aware of your GPS refresh rate, it can limit the sampling frequency and depending on what you are measuring may not show you the entire picture.
Old 04-08-2008, 10:23 AM
  #13  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
I would use the beacon for lap timing. GPS is good for speed and relative position, but I think the beacon is more accurate for timing. Also, be aware of your GPS refresh rate, it can limit the sampling frequency and depending on what you are measuring may not show you the entire picture.
I would use the Beacon but with each region having it's own policy on placing it out there it's a PITA.. I'll have to see if Potomac will allow one at Summit on 4/12, i'm assuming PDA will at Limerock on 4/19...
Old 04-08-2008, 10:28 AM
  #14  
FredC
Drifting
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,052
Received 68 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
I would use the Beacon but with each region having it's own policy on placing it out there it's a PITA.. I'll have to see if Potomac will allow one at Summit on 4/12, i'm assuming PDA will at Limerock on 4/19...
I thought DE events did not allow timing? That is what would compell me to purchase the GPS extension for my MXL Pista. You probably know this already, but at Club Races, you will definitely pick up signal from one of the 10+ beacons placed track-side - no need to bother setting up yours.
Old 04-08-2008, 10:36 AM
  #15  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,587
Received 272 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by constaf
I thought DE events did not allow timing? That is what would compell me to purchase the GPS extension for my MXL Pista. You probably know this already, but at Club Races, you will definitely pick up signal from one of the 10+ beacons placed track-side - no need to bother setting up yours.
Yep, at some events there is one out there already, even at DE's. There is no set rule on self-timing, but a DE can not be a "Timed Event", meaning the Region itself is forbidden to time it. Some regions forbid the placement of transmitters, some don't.. NNJR is one I know that won't let you put one up...


Quick Reply: How accurate are these GPS G-Meters?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:10 PM.