Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Puzzle for the weekend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2006, 09:53 AM
  #1  
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SundayDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Puzzle for the weekend

I found this to be very fascinating. I think this got missed in another thread, so I thought I would post a new thread.

An Indy car in T1 at Indy has the following ride heights:
F 0.875" R 0.125" down the straight which provides lowest drag. But in T1
F 1.250 R 1.875 for good downforce. Realize this car is now seeing 2+ g's straight down just from the banking, plus the aero downforce.

This car would show the same characteristics on a flat corner as well. There is no active suspension and things like shocks and heim joints are pretty normal stuff.

So how in the world can it raise the ride height under far greater downward forces?
Old 12-16-2006, 10:09 AM
  #2  
RedlineMan
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
RedlineMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vestal, NY
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tires.
Old 12-16-2006, 10:16 AM
  #3  
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SundayDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedlineMan
Tires.
Nope.
Old 12-16-2006, 10:17 AM
  #4  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,654
Received 1,418 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

The driver had burritos for lunch?
Old 12-16-2006, 10:56 AM
  #5  
Barfly
Racer
 
Barfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
The driver had burritos for lunch?
Old 12-16-2006, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Mark, I know...
Old 12-16-2006, 11:44 AM
  #7  
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SundayDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
Mark, I know...
I kind of suspected you would.

Nice meeting you this week. Has your head exploded yet from all the new information?
Old 12-16-2006, 11:55 AM
  #8  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Speed....and the Bernoulli Effect applied to the inverted wing shape of the chassis, lower the car on the straights.
Old 12-16-2006, 12:20 PM
  #9  
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SundayDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bull
Speed....and the Bernoulli Effect applied to the inverted wing shape of the chassis, lower the car on the straights.
Nope. Not that either. The speed on the straight vs. corner is not that much different and Indy cars run huge spring rates.
Old 12-16-2006, 12:36 PM
  #10  
Z-man
Race Director
 
Z-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North NJ, USA
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I suspect is has something to do with the centripital forces that are acting upon the car. Part of the 2-g's of force is 'lost' in the energy that the car is using to keep turning. IE: The car wants to go off on a tanget - by keeping the car in a circle pattern, all that potential downforce goes off to the side, and can't keep the car as planted as on the straights.

If that is correct, my high school physics teach would be so proud...
-Z-man.
Old 12-16-2006, 12:53 PM
  #11  
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SundayDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z-man
I suspect is has something to do with the centripital forces that are acting upon the car. Part of the 2-g's of force is 'lost' in the energy that the car is using to keep turning. IE: The car wants to go off on a tanget - by keeping the car in a circle pattern, all that potential downforce goes off to the side, and can't keep the car as planted as on the straights.

If that is correct, my high school physics teach would be so proud...
-Z-man.
Sorry, that is not it either. I will add that if you apply the lateral and vertical g forces through the car sitting on a setup pad, pretty much the same thing would happen. The ride height would go higher.
Old 12-16-2006, 01:11 PM
  #12  
shiners780
Rennlist Member
 
shiners780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Chassis flex?

Where exactly on the chassis are the ride heights being measured?
Old 12-16-2006, 01:19 PM
  #13  
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SundayDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shiners780
Chassis flex?

Where exactly on the chassis are the ride heights being measured?
It is not chassis flex (that would not raise all four corners of the car).
Height, I am sure, was accurately measured with laser ride height sensors.

I am about to get on a plane so am away from the puzzle for a while.
Hint - It is very intentional in the design of the suspension.
Old 12-16-2006, 01:27 PM
  #14  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SundayDriver
Nope. Not that either. The speed on the straight vs. corner is not that much different and Indy cars run huge spring rates.
Hey, I had to take the shot.....I try to use the only Fizzicks I know at least once a year, and it is getting late in the year!
Old 12-16-2006, 01:45 PM
  #15  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SundayDriver
It is not chassis flex (that would not raise all four corners of the car).
Height, I am sure, was accurately measured with laser ride height sensors.

I am about to get on a plane so am away from the puzzle for a while.
Hint - It is very intentional in the design of the suspension.
They are still using a Riley Rocker suspension, right?

Last edited by Bull; 12-16-2006 at 03:57 PM.


Quick Reply: Puzzle for the weekend



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:32 AM.