cage questions for DE car, possible club racer in near future
#76
Drifting
Nice work!
Looks good to me. The deflection numbers seem reasonable for the load. The only thing that I would consider changing is replacing the point loads in the head on crash with a distributed load along the bar, I think that would be more realistic although it may not change the deflection of the door bars much so it isn't a big deal.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this.
Looks good to me. The deflection numbers seem reasonable for the load. The only thing that I would consider changing is replacing the point loads in the head on crash with a distributed load along the bar, I think that would be more realistic although it may not change the deflection of the door bars much so it isn't a big deal.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this.
#77
Originally Posted by Geo
If you're up for it (after this round) perhaps you may want to consider modeling a more thorough cage. The reason for this is as I noted before, with a properly designed and constructed cage, each attachment point or node forms multiple load paths that I suspect can effect the results.
Bro
#78
Originally Posted by Cory M
Nice work!
Looks good to me. The deflection numbers seem reasonable for the load. The only thing that I would consider changing is replacing the point loads in the head on crash with a distributed load along the bar, I think that would be more realistic although it may not change the deflection of the door bars much so it isn't a big deal.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this.
Looks good to me. The deflection numbers seem reasonable for the load. The only thing that I would consider changing is replacing the point loads in the head on crash with a distributed load along the bar, I think that would be more realistic although it may not change the deflection of the door bars much so it isn't a big deal.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do this.
Bro
#79
Race Director
Ah, but this is a good example why good analysis is more than numbers. The sill tube, at least in my car, is there to prevent some car from submarining under the middle of the X and intruding into the cockpit.
Thanks for the clarification on the scale. That makes more sense to me now.
Thanks for the clarification on the scale. That makes more sense to me now.
#80
Race Director
Originally Posted by bruinbro
Can you give me some spatial coordinates of the joints or a stick sketch with dimensions? I can also model the bend radius' so include them.
Bro
Bro
#82
Originally Posted by M758
Dang I can't view pics at work. Darn firewall.
Bro
#83
Mr. Excitement
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Good thread, good input by many, good stuff. This is why Rennlist is stands out.
Note where the max loading of an X is in ether a side or angle load impact. The center. I would thing that this would be a good place for a TACO flat X or not. It would be interesting to see the deformation of the rest of the frame work that the X is attached to. My bet is that in many cars the X is stronger than what it is mounted to.
Note where the max loading of an X is in ether a side or angle load impact. The center. I would thing that this would be a good place for a TACO flat X or not. It would be interesting to see the deformation of the rest of the frame work that the X is attached to. My bet is that in many cars the X is stronger than what it is mounted to.
Last edited by kurt M; 03-21-2006 at 11:20 PM.
#84
Originally Posted by kurt M
It would be interesting to see the deformation of the rest of the frame work that the X is attached to. My bet is that in many cars the X is stronger than what it is mounted to.
Thanks for the kudos,
Bro
#85
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by kurt M
Note where the max loading of an X is in ether a side or angle load impact. The center. I would thing that this would be a good place for a TACO flat X or not.
It would be interesting to see the deformation of the rest of the frame work that the X is attached to. My bet is that in many cars the X is stronger than what it is mounted to.
#86
Pyramid teaser
Shall I continue?
BTW, is there a limit on the number of pages a thread can have? Should I make a new thread?
Bro
BTW, is there a limit on the number of pages a thread can have? Should I make a new thread?
Bro
Last edited by bruinbro; 03-21-2006 at 09:20 PM.
#87
Race Director
Originally Posted by bruinbro
Shall I continue?
BTW, is there a limit on the number of pages a thread can have? Should I make a new thread?
BTW, is there a limit on the number of pages a thread can have? Should I make a new thread?
You haven't seen Ghettoracer's "Open Letter" thread.....
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ht=open+letter
#88
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
OK...
George is not afraid of ignorance. I will be brave and not be afraid of utter density. Just to make sure, for my technically challenged mind. The main numbers in the value column are the amount of deflection. The -00/01/02 are the number of places the decimal point is moved to refelect the actual measured value?
I'm sure there must be a reason they display it that way.
George is not afraid of ignorance. I will be brave and not be afraid of utter density. Just to make sure, for my technically challenged mind. The main numbers in the value column are the amount of deflection. The -00/01/02 are the number of places the decimal point is moved to refelect the actual measured value?
I'm sure there must be a reason they display it that way.
#89
Originally Posted by Geo
Oh my....
You haven't seen Ghettoracer's "Open Letter" thread.....
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ht=open+letter
You haven't seen Ghettoracer's "Open Letter" thread.....
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ht=open+letter
Oh...never mind.
Bro
#90
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
OK...
George is not afraid of ignorance. I will be brave and not be afraid of utter density. Just to make sure, for my technically challenged mind. The main numbers in the value column are the amount of deflection. The -00/01/02 are the number of places the decimal point is moved to refelect the actual measured value?
I'm sure there must be a reason they display it that way.
George is not afraid of ignorance. I will be brave and not be afraid of utter density. Just to make sure, for my technically challenged mind. The main numbers in the value column are the amount of deflection. The -00/01/02 are the number of places the decimal point is moved to refelect the actual measured value?
I'm sure there must be a reason they display it that way.
Bro