Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Elise Dedicated Track Car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2005, 08:49 PM
  #16  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

I think the Elise has great potential as a track car. But I can't think of any reason it would be dramatically safer than your current car. There's less of the Elise mass to absorb energy. The results of your own mass slamming into it are not going to be dramatically different than with the Turbo. The usual argument of more mass being less manageable, in terms of accident avoidance, is less applicable to a TT than it would be to, say, a Yukon XL. With less mass, the light car will stop quicker, which means more rapid deceleration for the driver, right?

Admittedly, you'll pose less of a danger to others, as well as the track's infrastructure.

But weight-and-safety arguments always ring a little hollow to me, in both directions. There just doesn't appear to be all that significant a correlation.

The good things you're talking about are:

A full cage, and fire-suppression, and neck-restraint system will make a dramatic difference in safety. That's pure good.
The Elise is probably a better base as a weekend track car.
You will spend less on tires and brake pads with a lighter car.
Old 06-14-2005, 08:56 PM
  #17  
Sanjeevan
Three Wheelin'
 
Sanjeevan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dayton,ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

C.C., Even with the same aftermarket safety equipment would'nt there be more to crash survivability than just the kinetic energy you are carrying...

edit: sorry jack's comments were'nt there when I started pecking...I agree with Jack,
Old 06-14-2005, 09:06 PM
  #18  
carreracup21
Three Wheelin'
 
carreracup21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you would do best to buy a factory race car with all the safety equipment already installed and proven. Either a 964 Cup. 993 Cup or 996 GT3 Cup. They are all great performers with all the go fast goodies already installed. The mainenance issues in a well sorted older car don't have to be more than a new car. You will still have to change the fluids, pads, rotors and tires in all of them new or old. As long as you start with a decent engine and tranny you should be good to go for a long time. If you start with a new car, you will have to develope it which takes time and a good shop to do the work. I think it's much easier to get a proven platform, plus you will have a easier time selling it if you want to try something else. They all weigh about 2500 - 2600 lbs. though.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:21 PM
  #19  
ColorChange
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jack: If you look at the energy, that needs to be absorbed, I am almost guaranteed 1/2 the energy right off the bat. If I happen to be going fast due to my 650+ ponies, it could be 1/4 the energy. If you combine this with a full cage, full containment, fire suppression ... I think it is quite a bit safer alternative.

On the street, where you are likely to hit someone else, the mass helps you. On the track, where a collision with another car is much less likely, especially in DE's, mass hurts.

While cup cars et. al. are very safe, they still put me in the high(er) weight, higher horsepower category I am trying to avoid.

If I wasn't a Daddy, I'd still be in love with my track beast, but until the kids are older, I feel I need to dial it back.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:30 PM
  #20  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ColorChange
Jack: If you look at the energy, that needs to be absorbed, I am almost guaranteed 1/2 the energy right off the bat.
Ah, but the point you are missing is how much can one car absorb vs. another. That is the difficult question. I suspect the Lotus, being a Lotus (even a modern one), would be considerably more fragile.

Originally Posted by ColorChange
If I wasn't a Daddy, I'd still be in love with my track beast, but until the kids are older, I feel I need to dial it back.
Good for you. Nothing more important than children.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:32 PM
  #21  
ColorChange
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Geo: I agree that it's real tough to estimate crash absorption. If you look at the Elise, it really is pretty tough and it would have to have real bad absorption to lose the 1/2 advantage it starts with. Difficult to know. Any technical input or how to compare?
Old 06-14-2005, 09:35 PM
  #22  
Sanjeevan
Three Wheelin'
 
Sanjeevan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: dayton,ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ColorChange
Geo: I agree that it's real tough to estimate crash absorption. If you look at the Elise, it really is pretty tough and it would have to have real bad absorption to lose the 1/2 advantage it starts with. Difficult to know. Any technical input or how to compare?
I would say almost impossible...ergo! the need for crash tests.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:38 PM
  #23  
carreracup21
Three Wheelin'
 
carreracup21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the difference between a factory race car and something you develope yourself is akin to flying in a factory certified aircraft vs. an experimental homebuilt. Why re-invent the wheel. Buy something that has been proven on the track under race conditions. The factories have years of experience behind them and these cars are designed with crashing in mind.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:41 PM
  #24  
ColorChange
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The group that will be doing the conversion does all the Elise SCCA cars. Becuase something has more of it or a bigger history does not make it better. It doesn't make it worse for sure, it's just not a compelling arguement and the 600 lb or much more mass saving is.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:54 PM
  #25  
carreracup21
Three Wheelin'
 
carreracup21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the only mass you have to worry about is your body. A lighter car might suffer a more rapid deceleration when hitting a tire wall, thus causing more potential head or neck injury. Doesn't do your aortic arch any good either...rapid decel that is. I'm unsure of the elise and that aluminum monocoque chasis. I'm not sure how safe a barrier it is and what kind of strengthening is necessary to support a steel cage. Seems like a lot of uncertainties and questions to me, but it sounds like you have your mind made up. Should be a fun car, but I don't think it will necessarily be safer.
Old 06-15-2005, 12:00 AM
  #26  
Honkity Hank
Pro
 
Honkity Hank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Morgan County GA
Posts: 591
Received 46 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

On a lighter side you should consider just driving slower, or if applicable going on the South Beach diet.
Old 06-15-2005, 01:31 AM
  #27  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Q. Two cars slam into a wall at a race track. Car A weighs 4000 pounds. Car B weighs 2000 pounds. Which driver suffers fewer injuries?

A. The driver with the cage, harness, and neck restraint.

I agree that a factory-built race car will be more likely to have a safety system with components that work in harmony. That's not to say individual builders don't build safe cars. But some of them have very limited data to draw on. The factory certainly has more actual crash testing under its belt and more incident data, over a longer sample of years, to look at.
Old 06-15-2005, 01:52 AM
  #28  
dwe8922
Rennlist Member
 
dwe8922's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 919
Received 43 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I got to ride in a factory five racing spec cobra roadster, and was really impressed. Its an open car, but also has a tubular steel frame with an scca legal cage with nascar door bars. I think the weight is around 2300lb, consumables are cheap, they have a spec series with nasa, and a complete car should run between $20-25k. They are capable of 1:41 at road atlanta, which is fast.
Old 06-15-2005, 03:27 AM
  #29  
944TURBOS
Racer
 
944TURBOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey tim, if you want one, I still have my spot at fox valley, its all yours if they are still asking for more than MSRP. I got my spot a while ago and really can not get the car right now. Let me know.

I drove one and I think you will love it. Your turbo will have a ton more juice and the elise will feel sluggish in comparison. Judging from that ride you gave me at blackhawk I think you might want more hp in the elise. But let me tell ya, it feels the closest thing any car has to the shifter karts I have driven. I think you will like the go-kart like handling and responsiveness. I have been thinking of going out to fox valley again sometime soon. If you are headed out that way, shoot me a PM and I would gladly go out and if you want the spot hand it over to ya.
Old 06-15-2005, 08:19 AM
  #30  
ColorChange
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jack and others, here is why weight is important, but yes, let's assume both cars have full safety equipment. Carrera, your analysis is probably wrong unless one car has superior crash absorption compared to the other.

Car A = 1,900 lb 190 hp
Car B = 2,500 lb 400 hp

First, if anything happens while you are going even faster, the lower hp car wins. Let's assume Car A 110 mph, Car B 130 mph so you have 46% less energy (1/2 mass x velocity^2) in car A when you leave the track. Car A decels much quicker due to the lower mass and hits the wall at 60 mph. Car B hits at 90 mph. Now car A hits the wall with 66% less energy to absorb than car B. These numbers are only guesses by me but you get the point. Don't think both cars hit the wall at the same speed, they almost certainly do not: the lighter car will hit while going slower.

Mo, thanks bud! FVMC is at list now. They have a saffron yellow I may take a look at tomorrow. I need to make sure my helmet will clear the hard top. I'll pm my phone #.


Quick Reply: Elise Dedicated Track Car?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:22 AM.