Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which lowest maintenance Porsche to track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2005, 05:17 PM
  #31  
Glen
Race Car
 
Glen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 4,878
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Cup Car....
Old 02-03-2005, 05:18 PM
  #32  
DrJupeman
Rennlist Member
 
DrJupeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 9,170
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z-man
Jupeman: I confused the issue here. My car is a 16-valve 944S2. It is NOT cheap to run. The car I say that is cheap to run is the 944 8-valve non-turbo.
Two very different cars in terms of reliability and maintenance costs. The 8-valve n/a drivetrain is robust and bulletproof.

-Z.
Ah. Thanks for clarifying.
Old 02-03-2005, 05:21 PM
  #33  
Anir
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Anir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Fishman
My 993 is pretty easy and reasonable to maintain and so far it has been very durable. I don't think I have had one DNS or DNF. They aren't cheap to fix but what Porsche is?
Like Greg, my 993TT was relatively inexpensive to run with the exception of rapid Pagid brake pad use at long, fast courses like Road America. Nowhere near the $4,000 / year on maintenance mentioned earlier. Drove to the track and drove home every time....

...until the shunt in the Kink at RA, which resulted in damage that took 11 months and $48,000 to put right. The car's like new, but there is definitely something to be said for a "disposable" track car.

Old 02-03-2005, 05:24 PM
  #34  
Z-man
Race Director
 
Z-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North NJ, USA
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anir:
I think you've got a little too much toe out on the front passenger wheel there...

OUCH! $48k makes a wallet hurt real bad!

-Z.
Old 02-03-2005, 05:30 PM
  #35  
Anir
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Anir's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Z-man
Anir:
I think you've got a little too much toe out on the front passenger wheel there...

OUCH! $48k makes a wallet hurt real bad!

-Z.
Z,

Actually, it allows me to turn in sooner on sharp right handers.

Fortunately, State Farm covered the repair since it occured at a D.E.

After surgery (looks and drives like a new car, but "doctor" said no more track days):

Old 02-03-2005, 05:38 PM
  #36  
Earlierapex
Three Wheelin'
 
Earlierapex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,944
Received 119 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

How do you make a small fortune racing cars?






... start with a big one.

Late 80s Carreras are terrific. Very tossable and reasonably quick and reliable. Not too costly for a Porsche. Lots of fun, reasonably cheap.

If you want less expensive, go with less weight and less power. Weight and power eat tires, brakes, transmissions, etc.

A boxster S may not be a bad idea either. Low initial cost and lots of fun to drive. I don't know how they are on reliability though without the dry sump.

Have you looked at the lotus elise?

-dc
Old 02-03-2005, 05:51 PM
  #37  
Larry Herman
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Larry Herman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, NJ
Posts: 10,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Derick Cooper
Have you looked at the lotus elise?
Lotus?? Uh, Derick, Lotus and unreliable go together like Porsches and lift throttle oversteer. Yes, Lotii have a way of making even Ferraris look reliable. Even if it has a Toyota drivetrain, they'd find some way to make it breakable!
__________________
Larry Herman
2016 Ford Transit Connect Titanium LWB
2018 Tesla Model 3 - Electricity can be fun!
Retired Club Racer & National PCA Instructor
Past Flames:
1994 RS America Club Racer
2004 GT3 Track Car
1984 911 Carrera Club Racer
1974 914/4 2.0 Track Car

CLICK HERE to see some of my ancient racing videos.

Old 02-03-2005, 06:17 PM
  #38  
Z-man
Race Director
 
Z-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North NJ, USA
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[Homer Simpson voice]
Mmmmm.... lift throttle oversteer....Mmmmmm
[/Homer]

-Z.
Old 02-03-2005, 06:20 PM
  #39  
Z-man
Race Director
 
Z-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North NJ, USA
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Anir
After surgery (looks and drives like a new car, but "doctor" said no more track days):
Wow, it sure looks like an amazing repair job!

RE: the 'doctor,' I think I have one of those too - she's not a doctor, but her 'new kitchen' plans are certainly going to cut into the track budget this year!

-Z-man.
Old 02-03-2005, 06:23 PM
  #40  
Brian P
Rennlist Member
 
Brian P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Derick Cooper
A boxster S may not be a bad idea either. Low initial cost and lots of fun to drive. I don't know how they are on reliability though without the dry sump.
Actually not too bad. The one issue that a lot of Boxster S owners have is that the power steering system overheats. Installing a cooler in it solves that problem. Interestingly, I never had that problem with my base Boxster.

In fact, other than my wife putting my base Boxster into a tire wall, it was pretty damn bulletproof. If I could remember it, I'd change the oil about once a season, change brake pads more frequently, and that was about all the maintenance I did. Yes, it's the same one that I returned to the leasing company. My advice? Never buy a used car that has been leased.
Old 02-03-2005, 07:03 PM
  #41  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The truth is how much a car costs to run is heavlily dependant on who you are and how hard/often you run.

For me 944-spec car is dirt cheap. Part of the reason is I do all the work myself. A blown up motor due to a rod bearing failure is as expensive as it gets short of stuffing the entire car. Cost is $1000. for me. Why. $500 for parts (Seals, gaskets, etc) and $500 (or less for junk parts car and motor). Labor = 0.

So for me a 944-spec is darn cheap. Even running 20-30 track days a year under racing coditions takes 2.5 sets of tires. 1-2 sets of front brake pads 1/2 set of rear pads, 1/3 of front rotors. Probably a 5 oil changes.

That is it. As for parts breaking. Well mostly you replace them once. Meaning that they are old from 20 years of use and you replace and never worry about for years of track time. Get and early 944 NA and 2 new control arms and ball joints cost $75. Install them youself... they are not bad.

So... for me a 944-spec is nice and cheap. However pay Hans and Franz down the street to maintain and the costs get quickly out of hand.
Old 02-03-2005, 09:52 PM
  #42  
Matt Marks
Burning Brakes
 
Matt Marks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

An additional bonus to what M758 said, is that there's 944-spec racing series on the west coast, and 944 Cup in northeast, and southeast should your DE days not satisfy your track jones, and you want to step up to wheel to wheel.

And to Anir's point - if you should put it into the tires if your enthusiam bests your talent, the car is worth more in parts than it costs to buy.
Old 02-04-2005, 12:33 AM
  #43  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Have to agree that the 80's 3.2 Carreras are rock solid, reliable, simple and relatively inexpensive to set up nicely. Like Anir, I drove mine to and from the track for three years. Only broke once, and that was when some bolts backed out less than a week after a shop had done work on the car.

Its always going to be more expensive to prepare a competitive race car than a fast and fun DE car. Competitve Carreras in PCA F are not cheap to prepare. Going over to the dark side with a 951 that was fully track prepared, and competitive was a risky choice in some eyes. After a full season last year, which included 14 races and a number of DE events, the costs were very minor. This was fairly agressive running at the front of the pack - enough to win the series.

Aside from consumables, I replaced an alternator, rotors, and a TPS. No mechanical DNS/DNF until the very last race of the season. Blown head gasket.

I'm rebuilding the engine now. It will work out to be south of $3000 for a full refresh, clutch, new wastegate, and all new hoses [I learned THAT lesson!]. Maybe that would be more like $6000 or so if Hans & Franz [ thanks, Joe!] did the work, but even at that its not unreasonable. Parts are cheap, used parts are cheaper.

Not sure if its entirely a disposable car, but the upper limit of exposure is clearly less than Anir's body shop bill. FWIW, the 951 is a blast to drive. Still trying to figure out what the next step will be after the coming season.
Old 02-04-2005, 12:48 AM
  #44  
Benton
Drifting
 
Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm surprised no one has mentioned a 928. I just bought mine for $4000 with good maintenance records. Strip it down, put ~$7000-$10,000 in modifications, do your own work (key concept in having a low-cost racer), maintain it well, and you have a 300+ HP 2700-3000 lb vehicle that will be reliable for the most part.

Edit: Granted, it doesn't fit well into any racing classes unless the modifications exceed the $10,000 budget by a fair amount. GT2 PCA class is a viable option, depending on the extent of mods.
Old 02-04-2005, 12:50 AM
  #45  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Kibort Klock is now running.......................


Quick Reply: Which lowest maintenance Porsche to track



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:44 AM.