Porsche, profits, the race program, and the soul of the company
#31
Originally Posted by macnewma
...but aside from Ferrari who else sells something like a Cup Car?
#32
Originally Posted by JCP911S
I think this whole discussion frames the dilemma that PAG probably discusses in the boardroom. Every meeting. BOttom line... does Porsche exist to entertain car buffs or make money?
Originally Posted by JCP911S
Hard to know... Mercedes lived off their mid 50s legend for years.... then put two cars airborne... yikes... ask them thier opinion...
#34
Originally Posted by macnewma
The fact that Porsche sells the GT3 and produces Cup Cars that any schmoe (with $150,000) can buy is awesome. Some may not consider that Grassroots, but aside from Ferrari who else sells something like a Cup Car?
#35
RJ, I didn't know about Ford doing this. I am not a big Mustang fan, but I think it is great. That is what we really need. Cars like the Elise, 911 GT3, Z06, Miata, EVO RS, Viper Comp, etc are what we really seek.
Geo, I lament the days of a company that makes money simply by entertaining car buffs too. I think that Mazda and Porsche do it the best though. I personally think the Cayenne is hideous, but I can appreciate its addition to the bottom line so that Porsche doesn't fade into the distance. I think the 997 is evidence that Porsche is in tune with the enthusiats as well. They know people didn't like what the bean counters did during the evolution of the 993 to the 996 and they responded.
You are right the RX-7 was a helluva racing platform. The Miata following that. They need to make a track/street version of the RX8. BTW, quit correcting me.
JCP, as cool as the 997 Cup is (and I think it is cool on a level nearing RSR), I kinda wish they had kept it within reach of the amateurs more than the pros. I know the current $150k aint cheap (you don't see me driving one) but it is within reach and it isn't too far from a street GT3. Oh well. I will just have to fork over an extra hundo in a few years.
Max
Geo, I lament the days of a company that makes money simply by entertaining car buffs too. I think that Mazda and Porsche do it the best though. I personally think the Cayenne is hideous, but I can appreciate its addition to the bottom line so that Porsche doesn't fade into the distance. I think the 997 is evidence that Porsche is in tune with the enthusiats as well. They know people didn't like what the bean counters did during the evolution of the 993 to the 996 and they responded.
You are right the RX-7 was a helluva racing platform. The Miata following that. They need to make a track/street version of the RX8. BTW, quit correcting me.
JCP, as cool as the 997 Cup is (and I think it is cool on a level nearing RSR), I kinda wish they had kept it within reach of the amateurs more than the pros. I know the current $150k aint cheap (you don't see me driving one) but it is within reach and it isn't too far from a street GT3. Oh well. I will just have to fork over an extra hundo in a few years.
Max
#36
Originally Posted by macnewma
RJ, I didn't know about Ford doing this. I am not a big Mustang fan, but I think it is great. That is what we really need.
Originally Posted by macnewma
Geo, I lament the days of a company that makes money simply by entertaining car buffs too.
Originally Posted by macnewma
I think the 997 is evidence that Porsche is in tune with the enthusiats as well. They know people didn't like what the bean counters did during the evolution of the 993 to the 996 and they responded.
All my life I lusted after a 911 variant. No longer. For that money, make mine an M3 or M5, or an AMG Mercedes, or a number of other cars. It just doesn't stir my soul like the old 911s did, especially the 930. Of course, when the 930 was out, the 935 was an all conquering hero, raced to great effect all over the world.
#37
Originally Posted by Geo
First of all, don't blame the bean counters. They don't make the decisions. The product managers and marketing people do. Second, I'm not so sure the 997 is all that exciting (sacrilige that it is to speak that here). I also think the 997 is evidence Porsche is out of touch and they had to back peddle.
Originally Posted by Geo
All my life I lusted after a 911 variant. No longer. For that money, make mine an M3 or M5, or an AMG Mercedes, or a number of other cars. It just doesn't stir my soul like the old 911s did, especially the 930. Of course, when the 930 was out, the 935 was an all conquering hero, raced to great effect all over the world.
Its funny you mention the M3. I think the current M3 is further from the pinnacle of M3s, the E30 than the 997 is from the 73 RS. I am a huge fan of the 80s M-cars, M3, M5, M6. Those were enthusiast cars on par with 911s. Today's M3 to me is just a slower Z06. It looks great, but that is about it.
This is a cool conversation...by the way, why aren't we running Porsche?
Max
#38
Originally Posted by macnewma
I can relate to your sentiments over the 911 although I still like the 997. I wish they would bring back the RS concept at a lower pricepoint. It doesn't need to be a GT3RS. It should actually be cheaper than 911 Carrera. I guess in the same vein as the RS America
#39
Thread Starter
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,321
Likes: 177
From: The Flying Turtle Ranch
Some thoughts
It's wonderful that Porsche builds cars that club racers love.
Let's not forget that they have basically always done that. They didn't call the Carrera RSRs Cup Cars 30 years ago, but that's what they in effect were.
That is a big part of the image that's been built by their racing effort. (what are they up to now? 23,000 victories? Most were won on the amateur level.)
But since the 908 in the 60's, they've raced for overall wins. I maintain that all those professional level victories did more to influence the people who buy the majority of Porsches (remember most are NOT the hard core race freaks - pro or grass roots level - that we are).
Yes, Porsche can live off past glories and survive a run without a major race effort. But I believe that they are at the viable end of such a stretch. Much longer, and the image really starts to erode. They become has beens.
Brand managers don't determine what Porsches we get. The marketing department doesn't. The accountants dont. The engineers don't. They all have input. They affect the outcome certainly. But they don't run Porsche. The board does. And the board answers to two families. Piech and Porsche.
Yes, Prototype/top level racing is boring if there is only one strong player. Look how great it was in the 90s. Three Japanese players, three german ones, and a crazy, rich doctor from Atlanta. But even if they are the only player, they still get the PR benefits, just like Audi has.
If PAG was really struggling, the current plan would make sense. Use Cup cars, SuperCup and GT3RSR to keep a racing presence. But they are no longer struggling.
JCP
"Porsche never beat the GT40 head to head."
I'll take that bet. (Major endurance race, right?)
BTW, Porsche had an airborne flyer as well, about the same time.
Max
Actually I'd rather see Sunday Driver racing in Johnny Herbert's R8
It's wonderful that Porsche builds cars that club racers love.
Let's not forget that they have basically always done that. They didn't call the Carrera RSRs Cup Cars 30 years ago, but that's what they in effect were.
That is a big part of the image that's been built by their racing effort. (what are they up to now? 23,000 victories? Most were won on the amateur level.)
But since the 908 in the 60's, they've raced for overall wins. I maintain that all those professional level victories did more to influence the people who buy the majority of Porsches (remember most are NOT the hard core race freaks - pro or grass roots level - that we are).
Yes, Porsche can live off past glories and survive a run without a major race effort. But I believe that they are at the viable end of such a stretch. Much longer, and the image really starts to erode. They become has beens.
Brand managers don't determine what Porsches we get. The marketing department doesn't. The accountants dont. The engineers don't. They all have input. They affect the outcome certainly. But they don't run Porsche. The board does. And the board answers to two families. Piech and Porsche.
Yes, Prototype/top level racing is boring if there is only one strong player. Look how great it was in the 90s. Three Japanese players, three german ones, and a crazy, rich doctor from Atlanta. But even if they are the only player, they still get the PR benefits, just like Audi has.
If PAG was really struggling, the current plan would make sense. Use Cup cars, SuperCup and GT3RSR to keep a racing presence. But they are no longer struggling.
JCP
"Porsche never beat the GT40 head to head."
I'll take that bet. (Major endurance race, right?)
BTW, Porsche had an airborne flyer as well, about the same time.
Max
Actually I'd rather see Sunday Driver racing in Johnny Herbert's R8
#40
I can understand the argument that Porsche is running on the fumes of its past successes at the highest levels of sports car racing. One of the contributing factors to that, IMO, is that nobody is stealing the vacuum left behind. Audi simply doesn't count. Not because the R8 is less than spectacular but because Audi doesn't really build sports cars. So how would Porsche remedy this? Knocking off the R8 would only be noticed by Porsche people. Most of the race world wouldn't really care.
I think that if a competitive reminiscent of the 70s,80s, and early 90s were to return, it would be attractive to Porsche. When it really was an arms race between the great minds/manufacturers of racing people were interested. Although Porsche was the most dominant in the post Ferrari era, others were able to compete and at times best Porsche.
Unfortunately, I have no clue how the mess of separate sports car sanctioning bodies we have now could facilitate this. Do the car manufacturers even want this? It seems they would be happier just dominating something for 2-4 years and move on (Vipers then Vettes then Audis). Those companies have basically bought ad space at the top of the podium because of the rules lobbied.
Max
I think that if a competitive reminiscent of the 70s,80s, and early 90s were to return, it would be attractive to Porsche. When it really was an arms race between the great minds/manufacturers of racing people were interested. Although Porsche was the most dominant in the post Ferrari era, others were able to compete and at times best Porsche.
Unfortunately, I have no clue how the mess of separate sports car sanctioning bodies we have now could facilitate this. Do the car manufacturers even want this? It seems they would be happier just dominating something for 2-4 years and move on (Vipers then Vettes then Audis). Those companies have basically bought ad space at the top of the podium because of the rules lobbied.
Max
#41
Mike in Chi.... I was speaking only of LeMans... (who cares who won the 1000KM at Zandvort)... almost sucked me in on that one though....
Porsche is still about the only car you can drive right off the showroom floor, put race fluid, pads and tires on and track all season without it melting down.... while the current cars are a bit to soft for my taste, they do perform on the track.
GT-S or equivalent is the hot series... manufacturers going head to head with "real" cars with budgets that allow any serious player to play (sure we're talking several million a year for a front line effort... but that is way different from $50M.... )
macnewma.... depressing as it is, $150K is pissing in a puddle for alot of guys... for a near turnkey racecar that's dirt cheap... unfortunatley I have a rule not to buy a car that cost more than my house, so I am doomed to stand around in the paddock adjusting myself and drooling...
Finally, lets not underestimate how hot amature motorsports is... and I include DE in this... this has evolved form a fringe of greasy wackos to a mainstream weekend activity that rivals golf in demographics (if not number of participants)... most performance manufacturers are building cars targeted to this market.... Porsche sells every GT-3 they make....
It used to be "Race on Sunday... sell on Monday.." now it is "Sell on Monday... Race on Sunday"
Porsche is still about the only car you can drive right off the showroom floor, put race fluid, pads and tires on and track all season without it melting down.... while the current cars are a bit to soft for my taste, they do perform on the track.
GT-S or equivalent is the hot series... manufacturers going head to head with "real" cars with budgets that allow any serious player to play (sure we're talking several million a year for a front line effort... but that is way different from $50M.... )
macnewma.... depressing as it is, $150K is pissing in a puddle for alot of guys... for a near turnkey racecar that's dirt cheap... unfortunatley I have a rule not to buy a car that cost more than my house, so I am doomed to stand around in the paddock adjusting myself and drooling...
Finally, lets not underestimate how hot amature motorsports is... and I include DE in this... this has evolved form a fringe of greasy wackos to a mainstream weekend activity that rivals golf in demographics (if not number of participants)... most performance manufacturers are building cars targeted to this market.... Porsche sells every GT-3 they make....
It used to be "Race on Sunday... sell on Monday.." now it is "Sell on Monday... Race on Sunday"
#43
Thread Starter
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,321
Likes: 177
From: The Flying Turtle Ranch
JCP
No, I meant major. LM, Daytona, Sebring.
In '68, at Daytona, all the Fords broke, 908 won, even 1-2-3 iirc. There may have been a Sebring one as well.
But you're right, Ford was impressive at Le Mans.
I'd add Elise and 360CS, maybe even the boy racer mustangs, to cars you can drive off the floor and track.
No, I meant major. LM, Daytona, Sebring.
In '68, at Daytona, all the Fords broke, 908 won, even 1-2-3 iirc. There may have been a Sebring one as well.
But you're right, Ford was impressive at Le Mans.
I'd add Elise and 360CS, maybe even the boy racer mustangs, to cars you can drive off the floor and track.
#45
Porsche is currently going through a rough time with the base sports cars..nearly all car models are in the toilet for sales. Many references have been made that the Cayenne has saved the day. Maybe... However, has anyone ever asked if maybe base car sales are off so much "because" of the Cayenne? There are many unhappy Porsche fans who may have stopped buying the marque due the company's shift in focus to SUV's to "save the company". Brand equity is a strange animal...it doesn't disappear all at one time. However, brand erosion is insidious and gradual, until one day someone comes in with a "brand killer" and, bang, you've lost strategic equity. By far, most Porsche buyers are Cayenne supporters (look at the sales numbers). The real test will be whether these current supportors will be as loyal a few years from now as the previous generation of Porsche sports car supporters. Only time will tell.