Self-Policing Club Race Behavior: And Idea
10-03-2019, 03:37 PM
#46
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Colin makes a good suggestion. May I offer another one?
The same concept, except the "committee" (I hate that word) is made up of 3 or 5 professional coaches. There are plenty of us who work often with PCA racers. To avoid conflicts of interest, if one of the committee members is coaching a racer involved in a dispute the committee has been asked to adjudicate, he or she is recused.
This would bring a different level of experience to the table, and would also remove any perception of an old boys' club.
The same concept, except the "committee" (I hate that word) is made up of 3 or 5 professional coaches. There are plenty of us who work often with PCA racers. To avoid conflicts of interest, if one of the committee members is coaching a racer involved in a dispute the committee has been asked to adjudicate, he or she is recused.
This would bring a different level of experience to the table, and would also remove any perception of an old boys' club.
10-03-2019, 08:23 PM
#48
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
The same concept, except the "committee" (I hate that word) is made up of 3 or 5 professional coaches. There are plenty of us who work often with PCA racers. To avoid conflicts of interest, if one of the committee members is coaching a racer involved in a dispute the committee has been asked to adjudicate, he or she is recused.
.
10-04-2019, 08:49 AM
#50
Drifting
10-04-2019, 09:01 AM
#51
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
As a matter of fact - I think I am overqualified for the position!
10-04-2019, 09:09 AM
#52
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by FredC
We'll need a none coach there no? Thinking about unlikely scenarios when people under examination are coaching clients.
10-04-2019, 09:26 AM
#53
Drifting
10-09-2019, 07:10 PM
#55
While I appreciate the offer of an oversight committee, I believe we are trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Let's come at this from another direction. How about someone who believes they were wronged after appealing their 13/13, post the full information here including the appeal decision, and let the world see if the response appears to be "random". Failing that, send it to Dave and see what he thinks. Full background, all videos and the response....
West
West
Last edited by Weston Dillard; 10-10-2019 at 04:47 PM. Reason: Removing Peter from the volunteer reviewer list, since he didn't actually volunteer. Sorry Peter.
10-09-2019, 07:45 PM
#57
WRONGLY ACCUSED!
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
While I appreciate the offer of an oversight committee, I believe we are trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Let's come at this from another direction. How about someone who believes they were wronged after appealing their 13/13, post the full information here including the appeal decision, and let the world see if the response appears to be "random". Failing that, send it to Dave and Peter, and see what they think. Full background, all videos and the response....
West
West
10-09-2019, 10:47 PM
#59
Ya. I'd like people to understand the level of analysis, and explanation, that goes with an appeal. But it's not my goal to drag anyone, including the appeal reviewers, through trial by Rennlist, as Luigi calls it.
West
West
10-10-2019, 04:30 PM
#60
Rennlist Member
I can't speak for Peter. However, I am on board to help with West's idea. Obviously, if I was coaching one of the affected parties on the weekend in question, I'll recuse myself.
Last edited by Veloce Raptor; 10-11-2019 at 08:20 AM.