Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Canadian Grand Prix - Great Race Ruined by Stewards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:02 PM
  #16  
Matt Lane's Avatar
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 196
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Yup, bad decision - and the outcome hurt everyone involved.

Bad for Hamilton, he got booed - yet did nothing wrong. His race tarnished for 7 extra points he didn't need, ultimately for a legit track pass he couldn't (or chose not to) pull off.

Bad for race fans, robbed of a race with over 20 laps left to go. Hamilton laid back and took no risk (why would he?)

Bad for Mercedes - they looked whiny calling for the investigation in the first place (but that's called doing their job).

Bad for the FIA - they can't get it right even with a racer like Pirro on the case.

Bad for Ferrari - they needed this win for morale as much as anything.

All that said... it comes down to a marginal call that was caused by yet another Ferrari error. Between the team, their strategy, their drivers - they each take their turn making large and small mistakes about 5 x as much as Toto and crew. You just can't overcome that in a game of inches and tenths of a second.

Montreal really does deliver interesting race outcomes though...

Cheers

Matt
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:09 PM
  #17  
Matt Lane's Avatar
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 196
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Originally Posted by goin2drt
Great call. Go Hamilton. Raced his *** off and forced that mistake.
I'll grant you the last two of three. Sounds like everyone including HAM and VET thought the Mercedes was faster. So surely he could have finished the job sometime in the remaining 22 laps instead of sitting back. And then we wouldn't be talking about the silly penalty.

Old 06-09-2019 | 07:12 PM
  #18  
hf1's Avatar
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 1,640
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by signes
This is stupid. He didn't steer to right to block Lewis once he re-entered the track. The car was still loose and had another wobble he caught then went straight down the road.
Originally Posted by winders
Wow. You obviously have terrible eyes and know nothing about grass and momentum......
Originally Posted by multi21
No offense, but you may not understand the physics of putting down 1000 hp with a loose car and grass on all 4 tires. Video shows that VET didn't even track out onto the outside curbing. If HAM takes an inside line after he sees VET go off, HAM clears VET by a country mile.
Watch and listen after 0:18 below. He steps on the gas and steers (conveniently "corrects") to the right the moment he leaves the grass and regains traction. He was in a hurry to close the door on Hamilton. He didn't have to do that. He could have kept off the gas (just like he was going through the grass) and just rolled onto the pavement, but that would have provided racing room for Hamilton on the right. Hamilton took the outside because he was sure that a car rolling through the grass after so much braking (slow corner) would NOT have to go all the way across the track on the other side to regain control. Both Hamilton and the race stewards saw this and they both made the right decision.

Old 06-09-2019 | 07:13 PM
  #19  
goin2drt's Avatar
goin2drt
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 745
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Lane
Yup, bad decision - and the outcome hurt everyone involved.

Bad for Hamilton, he got booed - yet did nothing wrong. His race tarnished for 7 extra points he didn't need, ultimately for a legit track pass he couldn't (or chose not to) pull off.

Bad for race fans, robbed of a race with over 20 laps left to go. Hamilton laid back and took no risk (why would he?)

Bad for Mercedes - they looked whiny calling for the investigation in the first place (but that's called doing their job).

Bad for the FIA - they can't get it right even with a racer like Pirro on the case.

Bad for Ferrari - they needed this win for morale as much as anything.

All that said... it comes down to a marginal call that was caused by yet another Ferrari error. Between the team, their strategy, their drivers - they each take their turn making large and small mistakes about 5 x as much as Toto and crew. You just can't overcome that in a game of inches and tenths of a second.

Montreal really does deliver interesting race outcomes though...

Cheers

Matt
Bad for Hamilton and Mercedes? They won the race and really all the blame, if there is any, goes to FIA. The money that comes with winning, they could care less about the "fairness" of the ruling. Actually really bad for Vettel. He showed that he can make F1 interesting with all his childish antics after the race. It was entertaining though.
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:24 PM
  #20  
multi21's Avatar
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,270
Likes: 3,591
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
May be too late... And like NASCAR, they are HIGHLY unlikely to get back to where they were before.
Yea that's a great point Peter and had not thought about the parallels that one can take from both NASCAR and F1 and their continued diminishing viewership/interest.
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:24 PM
  #21  
signes's Avatar
signes
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,296
Likes: 646
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Watch and listen after 0:18 below. He steps on the gas and steers (conveniently "corrects") to the right the moment he leaves the grass and regains traction. He was in a hurry to close the door on Hamilton. He didn't have to do that. He could have kept off the gas (just like he was going through the grass) and just rolled onto the pavement, but that would have provided racing room for Hamilton on the right. Hamilton took the outside because he was sure that a car rolling through the grass after so much braking (slow corner) would NOT have to go all the way across the track on the other side to regain control. Both Hamilton and the race stewards saw this and they both made the right decision.

You're confirming you have no understanding of the circumstances. If you agree with the call that's one thing, but trying to string together some ill informed opinions to accuse Vettel of intentionally blocking Hamilton in that situation is ridiculous.
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:26 PM
  #22  
JTT's Avatar
JTT
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 354
From: Halifax, NS. Canada
Default

Bit of a class act, Lewis pulling Set up onto the podium. BS call by stewards without doubt.
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:33 PM
  #23  
multi21's Avatar
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,270
Likes: 3,591
Default

Originally Posted by JTT
Bit of a class act, Lewis pulling Set up onto the podium. BS call by stewards without doubt.
Reminds me of the time Ferrari asked Barrechello to pull over for Schumacher on the last lap of the Austrian GP and Schumacher insisted Rubens stand on the top step of the podium since the victory was obviously his... pretty disingenuous of Hamilton to do that when he asked for the investigation in the first place. I'm not saying HAM shouldn't have asked as it's his job to get full advantage of any circumstances, but then don't try and put Vettel up there if we're all "playing by the rules".
Old 06-09-2019 | 07:35 PM
  #24  
sbelles's Avatar
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,129
Likes: 265
From: Here some and there some
Default

FIA could screw up a wet dream but just like any reality show, manufactured drama has people talking about it.
Old 06-09-2019 | 08:00 PM
  #25  
DTMiller's Avatar
DTMiller
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 337
From: Summit Point, probably
Default

It seems to me that if you leave the track you shouldn't be able to then have your car go somewhere that impedes your competition. I know that isn't the language of the rule but Vettel's car ended up, after leaving the track, in a position that forced Hamilton to do something other than the standard racing line in order to avoid a collision.

If there was a way to have them swap spots and then race to the finish that would seem preferable to telling Hamilton he just needs to stay within 5 seconds of Vettel which is far easier to do than pass someone or try to hold them off.

Would have been fun to watch Hamilton try to make an actual on track pass for the lead of a race instead of try to stay within 5 seconds.
Old 06-09-2019 | 08:15 PM
  #26  
Matt Lane's Avatar
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 196
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Originally Posted by goin2drt
Bad for Hamilton and Mercedes? They won the race and really all the blame, if there is any, goes to FIA. The money that comes with winning, they could care less about the "fairness" of the ruling. Actually really bad for Vettel. He showed that he can make F1 interesting with all his childish antics after the race. It was entertaining though.
I kinda assumed that Mercedes winning the drivers and constructors championship was already foregone after six consecutive team wins... this will not get them any more money. My point was the FIA decision does nothing to help/benefit Mercedes or Lewis - just a few meaningless extra points while forcing Lewis and Toto to explain the unexplainable, "rules are rules" nonsense. Not their fault, just reality.

I don't think Lewis likes getting booed, and he didn't ask for this. I don't think he considers this a great day.

Sebastian was furious, so I'll cut him some slack here.

M
Old 06-09-2019 | 08:18 PM
  #27  
Nizer's Avatar
Nizer
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,684
Likes: 1,912
From: Wishing I Was At The Track
Default

Originally Posted by sbelles
FIA could screw up a wet dream....
Truth. Over regulation is destroying F1.

Originally Posted by DTMiller
Would have been fun to watch Hamilton try to make an actual on track pass for the lead of a race...
He couldn't get it done. End of story.
Old 06-09-2019 | 08:19 PM
  #28  
multi21's Avatar
multi21
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,270
Likes: 3,591
Default

Originally Posted by DTMiller
It seems to me that if you leave the track you shouldn't be able to then have your car go somewhere that impedes your competition. I know that isn't the language of the rule but Vettel's car ended up, after leaving the track, in a position that forced Hamilton to do something other than the standard racing line in order to avoid a collision.

If there was a way to have them swap spots and then race to the finish that would seem preferable to telling Hamilton he just needs to stay within 5 seconds of Vettel which is far easier to do than pass someone or try to hold them off.

Would have been fun to watch Hamilton try to make an actual on track pass for the lead of a race instead of try to stay within 5 seconds.
Perhaps swapped spots would have been preferable middle ground. As I understand it, timed penalties are not appealable so Vettel and Ferrari are SOL
Old 06-09-2019 | 08:24 PM
  #29  
DTMiller's Avatar
DTMiller
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 337
From: Summit Point, probably
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
He couldn't get it done. End of story.
No, he stopped trying as any sensible person in that spot would do.
Old 06-09-2019 | 08:29 PM
  #30  
PiB993's Avatar
PiB993
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 154
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

It sure looks to me like Vettel was not responding to the car oversteering with his last steering input to the right. Sure he was not under full control on the grass and the first moments on the track. He shut the door on Hamilton. Whether or not that deserved a penalty is open to interpretation.


Quick Reply: Canadian Grand Prix - Great Race Ruined by Stewards



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:41 PM.