161 for the red cup and would bang limiter for 100-200 ft
Braking at 200, sometimes a but after but was always messy then.
Car was well balanced with the grand am splitter and Crawford wing set with very little angle. Nowhere near the grip of the 7's through twisties but as coryf notes it had great straight handling...lol
Need to drop ride height and add some downforce for next run.

 

I saw that too so I was very happy that my new 4.0 was faster than his and I'm sure he came out of 11 better than I did. I don't think a stock cup can get over actual 160 unless it's in GTC4.0

 

Motec corrected wheel speed.

 

Here's the link for times
http://shoffit.com/COTA/

 

Given this is a FIA track, and based on the videos I've seen, I'm pretty sure the brake markers indicate meters not feet.

 

Nm

 

The 163-167 (corrected wheel speeds) was a GTC 4.0. The 161-162 was not.

 

At first I thought Glen was joking that brake markers were in Nano-Meters. Then, thinking Glen was more of a boat guy than a sub-atomic guy, I thought he was joking that the brake markers were in Nautical Miles.

After a full day with his 2 letter post rattling around my head, I have realized that he meant NEVER MIND. Two points:

1) I am SO not up to speed on texting abbreviations.
2) It is too late to NEVER MIND. Can I have my day back?