Cup Car Porn
09-20-2007, 01:50 PM
#31
Three Wheelin'
Is the 006 car in post 17 filling out the fenderwells better than the 871 because of the larger wheels, or is there another difference between between the 2000 cars and the 2002+ cars that I'm not aware of?
09-20-2007, 01:58 PM
#32
Race Director
Looks to me like the the 871 is running more negative camber in teh rear than the 006. Fronts looks to be very similar.
The following users liked this post:
C4Spolar (12-06-2023)
09-20-2007, 06:27 PM
#34
Well the 006 car may be running the 11s in the rear. I have both the 10.5 and 11 inch wheels. I just mounted up a new set of Pirelli 305/680s on the elevens and i can barely get a pinky between the bodywork and the rubber. If i remember correctly I am running 3.5 degrees neg in the rear.....
09-20-2007, 06:36 PM
#35
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vacuuming Cal Speedway
Posts: 7,306
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
Well the 006 car may be running the 11s in the rear. I have both the 10.5 and 11 inch wheels. I just mounted up a new set of Pirelli 305/680s on the elevens and i can barely get a pinky between the bodywork and the rubber. If i remember correctly I am running 3.5 degrees neg in the rear.....
Not enough if you are on Michelins Andy. Yokos like less, but the Michelin Cups want lots of neg. camber. I run 5f/4.5r.....
09-21-2007, 12:38 AM
#41
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, John. I will not be there but Loren and the car will be. He is going to give it a "shake down" before we take it to Miller Motorsports park next week. Are you going to Miller?
09-21-2007, 02:20 AM
#43
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
09-21-2007, 10:32 AM
#45
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts