Notices

996 engine mod.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2007, 08:19 PM
  #16  
por29
Racer
 
por29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seaford NY
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

chassis, Dastek loading (eddy current type)

It seems to be a very acurate machine
Old 04-15-2007, 08:23 PM
  #17  
Ed Newman
Three Wheelin'
 
Ed Newman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island , NY
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You cannot accurate extrapalte flywheel HP from a chassis dyno no matter what. You can draw a pretty accurate difference if you dyno the car, make the mods and dyno it again on the same dyno. The best you can do is compare wheel HP to wheel HP and it is probably safe to assume that 10 additional wheel HP is 10 flywheel HP. What was the wheel HP on the engine?
Old 04-15-2007, 09:24 PM
  #18  
por29
Racer
 
por29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seaford NY
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Every car that we have dyno'd has come up with the HP numbers (factory hp numbers) that it was supposed to have. I hear what your saying and I don't disagree but, the numbers I see have been pretty accurate.

Stop by and check it out one day
Old 04-15-2007, 09:26 PM
  #19  
Ed Newman
Three Wheelin'
 
Ed Newman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island , NY
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You never know. I'll stop by one day. We can talk about comp upgrades for my car.
Old 05-15-2007, 03:10 PM
  #20  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GREEK-TURBO-RACER
Al, how many kilometers do you have on the car ?? Reason I ask is because it is well known of the reliabilty drama the early engines had. Therefore a high mileage motor might not be worth moding.

As a reference, FIORANO RACING in Toronto did a power kit last year on a 996 3.4 motor producing 355 HP @ the crank. I was told the car went to a Mosport event and was an absolute bullit. Call Giovanni @ 416-741-1696 or on his cel 647-274-1696 if you need more details on the install.


Theo
i think if you have an early 996 that has passed the 60K mark without any drama than you've got yourself a good engine. mine has 96K on it. got it at 35K, i supercharged it at 78K. just had a compression and leak down test. 5~6% loss. everything looks OK. it would be a good idea to get a compression/leak down test before any serious mod.

355HP is quite a nice gain.... +55HP. before the supercharger, i did headers, exhaust, intake, flash, LWFW and i netted 25~30WHP. does the powerkit include cams and throttle body?
Old 05-15-2007, 03:14 PM
  #21  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by por29
I know of mods on the 996 NA that yielded 351 HP at the crank.

That consisted of headers, Cold air kit and computer tuning.

www.rudtnersracing.com
what drivetrain loss numbers did you use? some tuners like to hype up claims by using a 17% loss factor. the loss factor is more like 13%
Old 05-15-2007, 04:04 PM
  #22  
por29
Racer
 
por29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seaford NY
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Less. 12%
Old 05-15-2007, 04:33 PM
  #23  
karlooz
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
karlooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by por29
Less. 12%
so what was your car putting out at the wheels?



Quick Reply: 996 engine mod.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:15 AM.