Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Suntek PPF Regrets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2016, 01:43 AM
  #16  
BryanCO
Drifting
 
BryanCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,952
Received 211 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kyrocks
I've had both.
Xpel is a tad thicker but doesn't look as good on the car. Suntek is clearer. Both get beat up. Xpel markets their product better so people think it's better. Installer is more important than product.
Agree

Originally Posted by usctrojanGT3
Bingo...I have Suntek on my GT4 and 997RS and Expel Ultimate on my 991RS. They all look good. I've been told that Suntek looks better on lighter cars and Xpel on dark cars but who knows.
My installer does both but prefers SunTek and says SunTek looks better on dark cars.
Old 09-25-2016, 01:45 AM
  #17  
TONY AIR C2S
Rennlist Member
 
TONY AIR C2S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Simi Valley, Calif.
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Find a installer that you trust, Thanks Mooty they will tell you which product is best for your car, it's color, and it's shape. Do your homework
Old 09-25-2016, 01:53 AM
  #18  
Shockwave
Three Wheelin'
 
Shockwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,570
Received 99 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I've used XPEL and Suntek. Both are good.

I have Clearguard Nano on my car by Prestige Films and i am very pleased.
Old 09-25-2016, 03:10 AM
  #19  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,460
Received 5,741 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kyrocks
I've had both.
Xpel is a tad thicker but doesn't look as good on the car. Suntek is clearer. Both get beat up. Xpel markets their product better so people think it's better. Installer is more important than product.
right on.

if one really wants thick and dont care how it looks, 3M pro is really thick.
film is not to protect, but merely reduce the total damage.
Old 09-25-2016, 02:25 PM
  #20  
Crazy Eddie

Rennlist Member

 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 6,985
Received 69 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GeoJoe
Some installers would rather go with Suntek over XPEL... because 3M lawsuit

http://www.windowfilmmag.com/2016/06...on-3ms-patent/
My 2 cents...
Yes like a broken record ... 3m pro is the best protection out there and when compared with other thicker films ( looks the best period)
Suntek looks the best out the door but only in the first year ... Then all bets are off ....
I have said this many times... and I would not want to be involved it the above issues when that goes down 🙄
Good luck whatever you decide
Regards
Ed
Old 09-25-2016, 03:20 PM
  #21  
QShip
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
QShip's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 157
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My 987 with ~10 track days and 60k miles had less film and paint damage with whatever film Premier was installing in 2007 than my Suntek protected GT4 does with just 3.5k street miles. YMMV
Old 09-25-2016, 04:16 PM
  #22  
JUPJAI
Burning Brakes
 
JUPJAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 841
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I also have 3M pro.....thicker is better
Old 09-25-2016, 05:29 PM
  #23  
The Pope
Holy Guru
Rennlist
Registered Pontiff

 
The Pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: V City
Posts: 403
Received 43 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
Bull****, i have an assload of track days with suntek... and it actually looks reasonably good. They ALL get beat up.
Suntek looks much better installed than xpel.
No product will protect 100% from the **** that gets kicked up on track
This is absolutely true. My GT4 is the 3rd car I've had done with Suntek and never had any issues. Get yourself someone who knows what they're doing. It's all in the way the film is applied.
Old 09-25-2016, 08:21 PM
  #24  
gulf911
Instructor
 
gulf911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the opportunity to see side by side xpel and clearguard nano.
There was noticeable orange peel on the xpel. Not on the clearguard. That issue as well as clearguard being thicker than xpel sold me. Now I ran this at Cal Speedway and had black marks that simply melted off with a quick detailer and no rubbing. It is also self healing. Car is still perfect in front.

Also I used for the first time Xpels TRAcwrap.
I am surprised there arent more guys using this. Yeah , it takes a few minutes to install and it will bunch up a bit around curves of the car but it pulled right off and was incredible. Was very easy to apply , and can be applied over the PPF without issue.
Old 09-25-2016, 08:54 PM
  #25  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,689
Received 280 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Can anyone recommend a ClearGuard Nano installer in New England?

Last edited by d00d; 10-29-2017 at 12:00 PM.
Old 09-25-2016, 09:04 PM
  #26  
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
golfnutintib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ..............
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

i have a good installer and have been quite happy with suntek film he has applied on multiple cars
Old 09-25-2016, 11:01 PM
  #27  
Dr. Ferdinand
Rennlist Member
 
Dr. Ferdinand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North of 6,000 RPM
Posts: 1,702
Received 222 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

I had Suntek on GT4 #1, wasn't terribly thrilled but in principle of full disclosure more from an install perspective rather than the film itself. What is horse**** however is the claim that it is 'self healing'.

Going commando on GT4 #2 and no regrets.

PS: took delivery of a new car this weekend and ended up doing 3M on her
Old 09-25-2016, 11:29 PM
  #28  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,648
Received 1,815 Likes on 1,107 Posts
Default

NONE of these films are self healing. Well maybe if they get tapped by a falling maple leaf....

Street cars going commando is how I roll.
Old 09-25-2016, 11:29 PM
  #29  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,282
Received 1,460 Likes on 763 Posts
Default

They are both good. If you car got beat up than the film did it's job and probably minimized the damage. Xpel will perform equally. Now- I prefer Xpel but only because my installer uses it and he prefers to install it.

Xpel slightly thicker but should not make that big of a difference. Probably the reason Suntek has a lower haze due to it being slightly thinner
Old 09-26-2016, 11:47 AM
  #30  
gulf911
Instructor
 
gulf911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. Ferdinand
I had Suntek on GT4 #1, wasn't terribly thrilled but in principle of full disclosure more from an install perspective rather than the film itself. What is horse**** however is the claim that it is 'self healing'.

Going commando on GT4 #2 and no regrets.

PS: took delivery of a new car this weekend and ended up doing 3M on her
I call BS on your HS... lol

I dont know about the others but Clearguard DOES self heal , as I saw it for myself after scratching.


Quick Reply: Suntek PPF Regrets



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:27 PM.