Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MY Differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2013, 12:16 PM
  #31  
mcbit
Drifting
 
mcbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

To me the 957s are a better all round car than the 955s and the GTS is a peach.
Old 07-23-2013, 12:16 PM
  #32  
4ocious
Three Wheelin'
 
4ocious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,737
Received 161 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

2010 GTS also has the opening rear window.
Old 07-23-2013, 12:55 PM
  #33  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by mcbit
To me the 957s are a better all round car than the 955s and the GTS is a peach.

Except that its the same car with different fenders and a few tweaks.

A 955 Turbo is going to be nicer than a 957 VR6 any day
Old 07-23-2013, 01:01 PM
  #34  
mcbit
Drifting
 
mcbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

No argument there, VR6 would never do it for me, but I did prefer my 09 GTS to my 05 CTT (which is still a very fine car) as an all rounder.
Old 07-23-2013, 01:28 PM
  #35  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mcbit
..... I did prefer my 09 GTS to my 05 CTT (which is still a very fine car) as an all rounder.
I would mostly expect this simply because the GTS was a "refined" version of the platform that already existed. When they decided to do the GTS they actually had to think about how to make it different. The CS, and Turbo did not get as much thought into "change" as the model evolved. (not that they didn't evolve as well)
Old 07-23-2013, 01:34 PM
  #36  
williamr91
Pro
 
williamr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ann Arbor area - land of the libtards
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll give the looks dept to the GTS's they just are drop dead sexy. But the CTT is still my choice.
Old 07-24-2013, 01:05 AM
  #37  
mcbit
Drifting
 
mcbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole
I would mostly expect this simply because the GTS was a "refined" version of the platform that already existed. When they decided to do the GTS they actually had to think about how to make it different. The CS, and Turbo did not get as much thought into "change" as the model evolved. (not that they didn't evolve as well)
The other interesting thing to me is that the 05 CTT had all the rubber (suspension bushings and rubber mounts) on average every 40k - 50k kms from new and still never felt as taut and precise as either of my 957s which to date are still on original rubber and still feel/ felt like new cars. It was also not my 05 CTT in particular as I have driven several which all feel the same.
Old 07-24-2013, 01:37 AM
  #38  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mcbit
The other interesting thing to me is that the 05 CTT had all the rubber (suspension bushings and rubber mounts) on average every 40k - 50k kms from new and still never felt as taut and precise as either of my 957s which to date are still on original rubber and still feel/ felt like new cars. It was also not my 05 CTT in particular as I have driven several which all feel the same.

Hmm, I put the latest revision CTT-S control arms/bushings on mine and it made a difference. Fairly cheap upgrade.



Quick Reply: MY Differences?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:25 AM.