Notices
Boxster & Boxster S (986) Forum 1996-2004

ya Boxster..but why specifically...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2003 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
Tango's Avatar
Tango
Thread Starter
6th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: CA, LA
Post ya Boxster..but why specifically...

Hello to all-

I was wondering if someone could give me a brief overview of the 2k Boxster (base) v. a 2k BMW m roadster; both with approximately 50k miles in the 22 thou range. Which one would you pick and why? Does insurance and maintenance play a role in your decision?

Thanks-

Tango
Old 07-03-2003 | 08:27 PM
  #2  
ettsn's Avatar
ettsn
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Post

The Boxster S vs M Roadster would be a much better fight, but between the two you asked about, the M Roadster is certainly faster although the Boxster 2.7 is a vastly superior handler. What is more important to you? Also, maintenance will be pretty similar. For me, going from a 1997 M3/2 to a 2001 Boxster S made my insurance go down by a sizable number (a couple hundred $). I'd bet the base Boxster is substantially cheaper to insure than an M Roadster, but check with your insurer to be sure.

-Paul
Old 07-03-2003 | 08:58 PM
  #3  
Tango's Avatar
Tango
Thread Starter
6th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: CA, LA
Post

Interesting about the insurance Ett-

Yes, the M has the speed advantage; but does this outweigh the Boxsters style and handling? Of course, this answer is subjective.

Don't you love shopping for a car? There is always a counter argument...
Old 07-04-2003 | 10:05 AM
  #4  
craigg's Avatar
craigg
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Post

Another main difference is one car is a timeless classically shaped, mid-engined, Porsche and the other one looks like a SHOE!

I don't like driving shoes!
Old 07-04-2003 | 01:55 PM
  #5  
TT X50's Avatar
TT X50
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Post

Tango,
I'd suggest the 2k Boxster over the Z3M.

Sure, the BMW has a great motor in the M. But there are also a lot of other cars out their too with lots of grunt, like the C5. The Z3M goes fast in a fashion in spite of its very limited chassis, largely corrected in the Z4.

But the Porsche is fundamentally a superior sportscar. The mid-engine chassic has fantastic dynamics that will reward you with smiles as you start to explore its high limits. Subjectively, the Boxster looks great on your driveway.

One surprising bonus -- the two trunks acutually make the Boxster a great car to take on long trips. Something you can't say about many true sports cars.

So, get the Boxster and become part of Rennlist as an owner!
Old 07-07-2003 | 12:52 AM
  #6  
HBacura's Avatar
HBacura
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Post

I'd say ask this same question on a bimmer site, test drive both machines, do some history research on both that you selected and then make your final decision.
Old 07-07-2003 | 01:03 PM
  #7  
Doug&Julie's Avatar
Doug&Julie
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 7
From: The Beave, OR
Post

I'd be curious to hear what Z3M owners think of their car on a daily basis. (..and I do mean rainy-snowy-crappy weather-stop-and-go-traffic daily driving) I know it sounds silly, but I love my Boxster over the other Pcars I've owned because of how it handles the day to day...but still deliver the fun when I want it. (Which is often!)
Old 07-08-2003 | 01:46 AM
  #8  
Tango's Avatar
Tango
Thread Starter
6th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: CA, LA
Post

Thanks for the input Guys.




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:04 AM.