Notices
Boxster & Boxster S (986) Forum 1996-2004
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

996 powered Boxster Vs BoxsterS with TTP headers,intake, ECU and no cats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2003 | 11:24 AM
  #16  
J.Seven's Avatar
J.Seven
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Rami:
<strong>Hi J.Seven!

I also own a Boxster which is prepared by PSI-Motorsports. Mine was a 3.2 S and is now a 3.2 Bi-Turbo. Results in 365HP and 455NM torque.

I haven't tested the topspeed yet but acceleration 0-62mph has already been done in 4.8 seconds.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Ramirez when you say that the 0-100Kph was made in 4.8Sec, did you use the speedometer or any other equipment such as G-pro?

If you used the speedo, you have to have in mind that 100Kph on the speedo might be real 95 or 96Kph, either way is a heel of fast time to reach 100Kph. Do you have any figures for 0-200Kph?

J.Seven
Old 05-28-2003 | 02:19 PM
  #17  
Ghost Rider's Avatar
Ghost Rider
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Post

Rami,

Very nice, but as someone said, looks like a buttload of cash! I also wonder about giving up the rear trunk and water coming in through the vents on the trunk in a heavy rain, hopefully that isn't a problem for you. Going to tell us how much this set you back? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> Nice that your HP numbers are rear-wheel too!
Old 05-28-2003 | 08:21 PM
  #18  
Konstantin's Avatar
Konstantin
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 1
From: Germany/Braunschweig
Post

@rami
where did you got this dyno sheet? This is from a maha one of teh best dynos in the world and the numbers you see are DEAD acurate. you do not have to guess about HP on the wheels and HP loss.
I didn't knew that someone in the US has this dyno.
great conversion. please make some 100-150 km/h tests and post them here. thanks

Konstantin
I am thinking to put a GT3 Cup engine in a Boxster but I am really not sure if I wnat to do this. who knows. we will see
Old 05-29-2003 | 05:56 AM
  #19  
J.Seven's Avatar
J.Seven
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Post

Konstantin, this dyno is from PSI Motorsport, and it´s a Belgium company.
Old 05-29-2003 | 01:04 PM
  #20  
Konstantin's Avatar
Konstantin
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 1
From: Germany/Braunschweig
Post

ok thats why they use the MAHA dyno.

Konstantin
Old 06-06-2003 | 02:38 AM
  #21  
jlopez's Avatar
jlopez
AutoX
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Question

I have already made a down payment to Roock Germany for the exchange of the boxster S engine by a 3.6L 996 motor. I thought about the instalation of a 3.4L, but Mike (from Roock) recomended me a 3.6L because a better performance due to its higher torque.

Whenever the motor & air intakes, sport exhaust... will be installed (I hope soon) I will keep you informed.
Old 06-16-2003 | 02:36 PM
  #22  
Konstantin's Avatar
Konstantin
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 1
From: Germany/Braunschweig
Post

ok thanks
will you use the 345 Hp upgraded engine?

Konstantin
Old 06-16-2003 | 04:31 PM
  #23  
jlopez's Avatar
jlopez
AutoX
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Post

Right Konstantin, It's the RSB 340 conversion.
Do you have any news about this Roock conversion?
Old 06-21-2003 | 05:03 PM
  #24  
Jimmy_D's Avatar
Jimmy_D
Intermediate
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Jersey
Post

How did he remove the cats? Doesn't it require change in placement of O2 sensors?

I'm very impressed with the Horsepower Output utilizing that combination. Who was the ECU programmed by?

Is this something that you would recommend be done all at one time? Headers, intake, cat-removal, then ECU?

And given the power/weight ratio of the newly powered Boxster S, how would it now compare to a 996 C2?

Thanks for the help....
Old 06-25-2003 | 04:38 AM
  #25  
bimmer's Avatar
bimmer
Track Day
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Post

I am so curious as well!!

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Jimmy_D:
<strong>How did he remove the cats? Doesn't it require change in placement of O2 sensors?

I'm very impressed with the Horsepower Output utilizing that combination. Who was the ECU programmed by?

Is this something that you would recommend be done all at one time? Headers, intake, cat-removal, then ECU?

And given the power/weight ratio of the newly powered Boxster S, how would it now compare to a 996 C2?

Thanks for the help....</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">
Old 08-19-2010 | 12:25 AM
  #26  
83sweet928's Avatar
83sweet928
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Can the Cats be emptyed and cleaned out and still be on the car? On my 928S I had this done and the sound is incredible.

Thanks



Quick Reply: 996 powered Boxster Vs BoxsterS with TTP headers,intake, ECU and no cats



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:17 AM.