High Mileage 2000 Boxter S Value
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High Mileage 2000 Boxter S Value
Tonight, I will be looking at a 2000 Boxter S, silver with black leather interior, and would like any useful input you may have regarding the value of this car.
It is supposetly in excellent condition, and listed in the low $20's. It has 100,000+ miles. Exatly how many I will find out. I am assuming no accidents, and everything works well.
Is $23-$24K a good price for such a car, assuming it is in excellent condition.
Are there any problems that might be occuring soon due to its high mileage?
I greatly appreciate any input you may have about such a purchase, and whether or not I should steer clear of a Boxter S with this many miles.
Thanks in advance,
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
It is supposetly in excellent condition, and listed in the low $20's. It has 100,000+ miles. Exatly how many I will find out. I am assuming no accidents, and everything works well.
Is $23-$24K a good price for such a car, assuming it is in excellent condition.
Are there any problems that might be occuring soon due to its high mileage?
I greatly appreciate any input you may have about such a purchase, and whether or not I should steer clear of a Boxter S with this many miles.
Thanks in advance,
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
#2
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just realized, Boxster is the correct spelling. I feel like a dope.
I was not able to look at the car in question as anticipated, but plan to on Thurscay 5/20.
Anyway, any input is appreciated on the value of a 105K mile 2000 Boxster S in supposedly "Excellent" condition.
Thanks again,
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
I was not able to look at the car in question as anticipated, but plan to on Thurscay 5/20.
Anyway, any input is appreciated on the value of a 105K mile 2000 Boxster S in supposedly "Excellent" condition.
Thanks again,
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
#3
Miserable Old Bastard
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
You should be able to find one with 30,000 miles (or less) that shouldn't set you back more than 30k (that's a rough estimate, not precise market information). Porsche's with high milage are always worth substantially less than lower milage cars. With any car things wear out over time. I would think it would be a mistake to buy a car with that many miles to save a few bucks now, which you will undoubtedly more than give back in service and repairs and in resale later. Just not worth it in my book.
#4
That is the highest mileage S I've heard of... I don't know of any specific worries about such a high mileage example, but OTOH there are plenty of low mileage S models out there. I agree with Jim...unless you're getting a STEAL, you might as well shop around a bit more.
#6
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your input folks. If I actually fit in the car, I would probably be interested, especially at an asking price of $23,950 for an S. It was in nice shape, but once I sat in the car, I completely detached emotionally from it, as there is no way I could drive that car on a daily basis (I'm 5'19). Both the headroom and leg room were completely inadequate. I thought it would be tight, but it was WAY too small inside.
It is silver with black leather interior and black top. Multi spoke wheels, red brakes, etc... very nice. I think it is still listed on Autotrader Online in the Seattle area if anyone is interested. It will make someone a happy owner I am sure.
One small car that does fit me is the Audi TT, but the thing is a beast at 3,300+ lbs, and another 100lbs for the roadster. It is quite cavernous inside! Of course, I could always get another 911... and the search goes on!
Regards,
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
It is silver with black leather interior and black top. Multi spoke wheels, red brakes, etc... very nice. I think it is still listed on Autotrader Online in the Seattle area if anyone is interested. It will make someone a happy owner I am sure.
One small car that does fit me is the Audi TT, but the thing is a beast at 3,300+ lbs, and another 100lbs for the roadster. It is quite cavernous inside! Of course, I could always get another 911... and the search goes on!
Regards,
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
#7
Jason, you might consider adding eth GT3 console delete package to the Boxster. It eliminates the front center console, greatly improving lateral legroom. I'm 6'2" and fit fine.
Trending Topics
#8
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That GT3 console delete might help with the legroom, but my head was firmly implanted against the top with the seat in the down, back, and tilted position. I would need 3" more headroom for it to work. I suppose if I had to have a Boxster, I would make it work, but the idea of chopping up an otherwise perfectly good car just so it fits me does not appeal to me, at least for my daily driver.
My 1977 911s track car has been heavily modified, and fits me with a helmet on only because the seat is essentially affixed directly to the floor, and the entire roof was removed nearly gutter to gutter, and a carbon fiber panel from GT racing installed.
Honestly, I don't know what I was thinking when I thought I would fit in a Boxster. I supppose I was completely blinded by the thought of driving a Boxster S every day for the next 4 years. I simply ignored the fact that the Boxster would be like most other small convertibles, just too small for me.
Thanks again for all your input.
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
2000 Maxima (for a while longer)
My 1977 911s track car has been heavily modified, and fits me with a helmet on only because the seat is essentially affixed directly to the floor, and the entire roof was removed nearly gutter to gutter, and a carbon fiber panel from GT racing installed.
Honestly, I don't know what I was thinking when I thought I would fit in a Boxster. I supppose I was completely blinded by the thought of driving a Boxster S every day for the next 4 years. I simply ignored the fact that the Boxster would be like most other small convertibles, just too small for me.
Thanks again for all your input.
Jason F
1977 911s 3.2
2000 Maxima (for a while longer)
#9
Jason,
I am guessing that the S had power seats. Compared with the manual seats, headroom is limited by a few inches.
I would stay away from a 100k 986S for $20k. Unlike the air-cooled motors of the past, there are far too many things that can go wrong.
I am guessing that the S had power seats. Compared with the manual seats, headroom is limited by a few inches.
I would stay away from a 100k 986S for $20k. Unlike the air-cooled motors of the past, there are far too many things that can go wrong.
#10
Porsche Nut
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I'm 5'11 and I have more than enough room. I don't even have the seats back all the way and I have plenty of headroom.
The comment someone made about electric seats may be the reason. If you still like the Boxster, check one out that has non electric seats. (My seats are sport seats and the front to back adjustment is done manually. The tilt is done electrically.)
Charlie
The comment someone made about electric seats may be the reason. If you still like the Boxster, check one out that has non electric seats. (My seats are sport seats and the front to back adjustment is done manually. The tilt is done electrically.)
Charlie
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm 6'1" about 230 and I have the sports seats like Charlie C. The car is snug but not overly tight. It really feels like you put the car on when you drive it - just seems to fit really well. I get some wind rush over the top of the windshield with the top down but nothing severe enough to detract from the joy of driving. If you can find one with the manual seats, drive it and see how it feels.
#12
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am 6'7 as previously stated (I said 5'19 trying to be funny). The S I tried on had non power seats, and lacked headroom for me.
I would definately need to be 3 -4 inches lower in the car to be comfortable, and not have my head above the windshield. I don't believe this can be done without cutting the floor and lowering the seat mounting point, can it?
Jason f
1977 911s 3.2
I would definately need to be 3 -4 inches lower in the car to be comfortable, and not have my head above the windshield. I don't believe this can be done without cutting the floor and lowering the seat mounting point, can it?
Jason f
1977 911s 3.2
#13
Nordschleife Master
Originally posted by Jason F
I would definately need to be 3 -4 inches lower in the car to be comfortable, and not have my head above the windshield. I don't believe this can be done without cutting the floor and lowering the seat mounting point, can it?
I would definately need to be 3 -4 inches lower in the car to be comfortable, and not have my head above the windshield. I don't believe this can be done without cutting the floor and lowering the seat mounting point, can it?
#14
Originally posted by Pesky 914
I think the only way to get an extra 3-4 inches is to install GT3 seats (or other racing seats) with the fixed BK mounts. A friend of mine did this (he's 6'2") when he tracked his 986S in order to pass the "broomstick test".
I think the only way to get an extra 3-4 inches is to install GT3 seats (or other racing seats) with the fixed BK mounts. A friend of mine did this (he's 6'2") when he tracked his 986S in order to pass the "broomstick test".
The fixed BK mounts are a nuiscance if you have multiple drivers and are a huge PITA to install/remove. That being said, if you are too tall, you don't have many better options.
BTW: I LOVE the GT3 center console delete option. It gives a real nice look to the interior of the car.