Notices

new SCCA for Porsche

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2010, 09:44 PM
  #1  
porrsha
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
porrsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Green Cove Springs, FL
Posts: 10,997
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default new SCCA for Porsche

NOT RECOMMENDED
- Stock: Classify Porsche 997 GT3 (ref. 09-724) Comment: The 996 GT3 has demonstrated parity with the top of the SS
class, and the 997 is seen as having significant advantages beyond the 996.

- ST: Classify Toyota MR2 Turbo in STR (ref. 09-670)
- ST: Classify Acura NSX in STR (ref. 09-670)
- ST: Classify Porsche Boxster in STR (ref. 09-699)
- ST: Turbo FWD cars in STX (ref. 09-685)
- ST: Drivetrain Mounts (ref. 09-692)
- ST: STR catalytic converter allowances (ref. 09-728)
- SP: Reclassify Porsche 997 GT3 (ref. 09-724) Comment: The **** feels this car can be competitive where it is presently
classed
.
- SP: Allow use of a line lock to satisfy emergency brake requirement (ref. 09-724)
Boxster Spyder to Super Stock
4. Stock: per the SAC, the following new listing item is added, effective immediately upon publication:
Porsche Boxster Spyder (‘11) SS
Old 01-23-2010, 09:19 AM
  #2  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,136
Received 160 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

I was reading the SCCA rules and cannot find a class designation for the 2009-2010 base Cayman. The 2009-2010 Cayman S and Boxster S have been put in Super stock (SS), the 2008 and earlier Cayman S and Boxster S in A stock (AS). The 2008 and earlier base Cayman and Boxster are in B stock (BS) but there is no reference ot the 2009-2010 base Cayman and or base Boxster. Anyone have an answer.
Old 01-23-2010, 11:24 AM
  #3  
00r101
Racer
 
00r101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is no listing for the '09+ base Boxster and Cayman that I can find. Until there is one they go to SS by default. I have asked a Stock Class Advisory Committee member for a clarification. Should hear from him shortly.
Old 01-23-2010, 12:24 PM
  #4  
00r101
Racer
 
00r101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's what I heard back:
"My guess is we haven't classed it and the old listing is not inclusive. AS is a good guess."
Old 01-23-2010, 12:44 PM
  #5  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,136
Received 160 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

I would hope not super stock as I have 40 plus less Hp than an 09 Cayman S and even more form some of the other cars.
Old 01-23-2010, 04:24 PM
  #6  
porrsha
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
porrsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Green Cove Springs, FL
Posts: 10,997
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00r101
There is no listing for the '09+ base Boxster and Cayman that I can find. Until there is one they go to SS by default. I have asked a Stock Class Advisory Committee member for a clarification. Should hear from him shortly.
The Cayman and the Boxster are both B/S by the 2010 rules
use this link
2010 classes
Old 01-23-2010, 07:13 PM
  #7  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,136
Received 160 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porrsha
The Cayman and the Boxster are both B/S by the 2010 rules
use this link
2010 classes
according ot the link you gave, it is the 2008 and earlier Cayman and Boxster that is in "B" stock. Unless I am missing something I have not found the 2009-2010 Cayman (non S) or the Boxster (non S) listed. I certainly do not want to run Super stock with a base Cayman it would be non-competitive against the Cayman/ Boxster S and the other cars in that class
Old 01-23-2010, 09:40 PM
  #8  
porrsha
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
porrsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Green Cove Springs, FL
Posts: 10,997
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f4 plt
according ot the link you gave, it is the 2008 and earlier Cayman and Boxster that is in "B" stock. Unless I am missing something I have not found the 2009-2010 Cayman (non S) or the Boxster (non S) listed. I certainly do not want to run Super stock with a base Cayman it would be non-competitive against the Cayman/ Boxster S and the other cars in that class
Even the november/december/ january fast tracks do not address what you are asking link

My bet is that you are making this harder than you need to. There were not huge performance gains for the 2009 or 2010 cayman. Classify it as B/S until you get protested, in the mean time write a note to the solo board.
Old 01-24-2010, 02:21 PM
  #9  
00r101
Racer
 
00r101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Section 13.1 of the rules state:
"Car models not specifically listed in any Stock Category class must have been produced, and must meet the above requirements and been sold through normal U.S. dealerships, in quantities of at least 1,000 in a 12-month period in order to be eligible for the Stock Category."

Appendix A states:
"All unclassified cars will compete in Super Stock until classified by the SEB, unless covered by a “catch-all” description. To use the catch-alls at the end of the specific car classes in Appendix A, start from Super Stock and work down the classes until a class is found. Such unclassified cars will not be eligible for Divisionals, Tours, or the National Championships. Members should look for a Tech Bulletin in
an early current-year issue of the official SCCA publication (FastrackNews) for details or contact the National office."

There are no catchalls listed in A, B, C, D, E, or G. The catchall for F is all V-8 sedans (which Box and Cayman don't fit. And the catchall for H is all Pickups NOC which Box and Cay don't fit.

So, until a ruling is made '09+ Boxster and Cayman are in SS. However, I am sure that SEB will rule shortly to put them in AS or BS. The reason we might see them in AS as opposed to BS is because of the availability of the LSD.
Old 01-24-2010, 03:52 PM
  #10  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 65 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

How is a traditional LSD better than the electronic version Boxsters and Caymans already sport? Seems like it should be irrelevant whether the power is redistributed from the slipping wheel through the hub or at the brake rotors.
Old 01-24-2010, 03:56 PM
  #11  
f4 plt
Rennlist Member

 
f4 plt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,136
Received 160 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00r101
Section 13.1 of the rules state:
"Car models not specifically listed in any Stock Category class must have been produced, and must meet the above requirements and been sold through normal U.S. dealerships, in quantities of at least 1,000 in a 12-month period in order to be eligible for the Stock Category."

Appendix A states:
"All unclassified cars will compete in Super Stock until classified by the SEB, unless covered by a “catch-all” description. To use the catch-alls at the end of the specific car classes in Appendix A, start from Super Stock and work down the classes until a class is found. Such unclassified cars will not be eligible for Divisionals, Tours, or the National Championships. Members should look for a Tech Bulletin in
an early current-year issue of the official SCCA publication (FastrackNews) for details or contact the National office."

There are no catchalls listed in A, B, C, D, E, or G. The catchall for F is all V-8 sedans (which Box and Cayman don't fit. And the catchall for H is all Pickups NOC which Box and Cay don't fit.

So, until a ruling is made '09+ Boxster and Cayman are in SS. However, I am sure that SEB will rule shortly to put them in AS or BS. The reason we might see them in AS as opposed to BS is because of the availability of the LSD.
Interesting that they have classified the new Cayman S and Boxster S but not the base models
Old 01-24-2010, 07:41 PM
  #12  
PedalFaster
Pro
 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 622
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
How is a traditional LSD better than the electronic version Boxsters and Caymans already sport? Seems like it should be irrelevant whether the power is redistributed from the slipping wheel through the hub or at the brake rotors.
Traditional LSDs work. Porsche's e-diff (ABD) doesn't really. That's very relevant to how the cars are classed.
Old 01-25-2010, 07:47 PM
  #13  
00r101
Racer
 
00r101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster
Traditional LSDs work. Porsche's e-diff (ABD) doesn't really. That's very relevant to how the cars are classed.
Exactly. Is there a single e-diff by any manufacturer that is close to a decent mechanical LSD (read that as not a Ford diff)? I don't think so.
Old 01-26-2010, 01:31 PM
  #14  
porrsha
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
porrsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Green Cove Springs, FL
Posts: 10,997
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

The SCCA National Convention is abouyt to happen. In conjunction with that I replied to an email from the solo board about input. I complained about the cayman issue and also bad info on the scca website. Heere is the latest response:
Hi,



We are still working on making all of the changes to the 2010 rulebook. Along with getting ready for convention we haven’t had time to update the car listings for 2010. They will be up as soon as we can get it up. For right now go by the 2010 rules that are posted which that is always what you need to go by in the end. As for the base Cayman the Stock Advisory Committee (SAC) actually just realized the other day that this car is not classed yet. They are working on deciding a class for it. Since it isn’t listed yet as soon as the SAC and the SEB decide on a class and post it in a FasTrack it will be effective immediately because it will be in a tech bulletin. For a regional event the region can decide where it can run though because of rule 1.1 which allows regions to class cars how they see fit. If the region feels the car should be run in AS or BS at a regional event it can do that. For a Divisional or National event it would be SS. I would venture a guess that you will see the base Cayman classed in a FasTrack by March or April.



Brian Harmer

SCCA Solo Technical Specialist

1-800-770-2055

Solo National Rules: http://www.scca.com/documents/Solo_R...Solo_Rules.pdf

FastTrack: http://www.scca.com/contentpage.aspx?content=78
Old 03-22-2010, 10:28 PM
  #15  
porrsha
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
porrsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Green Cove Springs, FL
Posts: 10,997
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

this was in today's Fast Track for April SCCA.
TECH BULLETINS
1. Stock: The following new listings, effective immediately upon publication, are added to Appendix A:
Porsche Boxster and Cayman (non-S) (2009-‘10) AS
Audi TT-S (’10) BS


Quick Reply: new SCCA for Porsche



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:43 AM.