BS 996
#46
Drifting
GT4 has some taller gearing, but it also has 25% more torque and hp. I can't see all your calcs so I'm not sure where the error may be, but real world GT4 is a half second faster to 60mph and a full second faster over a quarter mile.
I agree completely with you that the bottom half of AS makes more sense in BS, and has for several years.
I agree completely with you that the bottom half of AS makes more sense in BS, and has for several years.
#47
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
GT4 has some taller gearing, but it also has 25% more torque and hp. I can't see all your calcs so I'm not sure where the error may be, but real world GT4 is a half second faster to 60mph and a full second faster over a quarter mile.
I agree completely with you that the bottom half of AS makes more sense in BS, and has for several years.
I agree completely with you that the bottom half of AS makes more sense in BS, and has for several years.
If the GT4 could be purchased with 19s, well, that's what I need to know. At the time I added it I didn't think so.
There are several cases where an earlier car that can use 18" rims gets a boost compared to a later car that cannot. That will not be reflected in tested 0-60 times. In fact, 0-60 (much less quarter-mile times) is nearly useless for predicting non-Pro-solo autocross performance anyway. The 987.2PDK is rated using PDK 2nd gear and the short 18" tire. No special adjustment is made for the PDK.
Things would be much simpler if I didn't worry about these rim size cases, but I think it's a feature, not a bug in the system.
Last edited by edfishjr; 01-25-2022 at 11:53 AM.
#48
Drifting
I'm carrying 310 lb-ft for the GT4 and 273 for the 981CS. I have assigned the 981CS a quite short 18" rear tire, which is I think the fastest configuration. The GT4, afaik, came only with 20" rims and thus cannot run that 18" tire. This is what hurts 2nd gear peak thrust the most in the spreadsheet, more than what's in the gearbox.
If the GT4 could be purchased with 19s, well, that's what I need to know. At the time I added it I didn't think so.
There are several cases where an earlier car that can use 18" rims gets a boost compared to a later car that cannot. That will not be reflected in tested 0-60 times. In fact, 0-60 (much less quarter-mile times) is nearly useless for predicting non-Pro-solo autocross performance anyway. The 987.2PDK is rated using PDK 2nd gear and the short 18" tire. No special adjustment is made for the PDK.
Things would be much simpler if I didn't worry about these rim size cases, but I think it's a feature, not a bug in the system.
If the GT4 could be purchased with 19s, well, that's what I need to know. At the time I added it I didn't think so.
There are several cases where an earlier car that can use 18" rims gets a boost compared to a later car that cannot. That will not be reflected in tested 0-60 times. In fact, 0-60 (much less quarter-mile times) is nearly useless for predicting non-Pro-solo autocross performance anyway. The 987.2PDK is rated using PDK 2nd gear and the short 18" tire. No special adjustment is made for the PDK.
Things would be much simpler if I didn't worry about these rim size cases, but I think it's a feature, not a bug in the system.
Last edited by sjfehr; 01-26-2022 at 07:29 PM.
#49
#51
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Now that strano is willing to drive a super pony since they were gifted a class and easier pax, is there anyone who doesn’t think that BS and FS should just be combined, as they should have been in the first place? Strano is showing that the New FS cars always had the pace, but no one was seriously going to try one until the possibility of a freebie jacket was on the table. The older mustangs that people were worried about in FS are long gone.
I truly wish there was another decent autocross club, because the classing and decision making at SCCA is awful. The majority of decisions are made to make sure that people who aren’t very smart stay happy. leadership literally pointed out in the above comments that if a cayman became dominant in AS that the class would end. We’re racing with people who won’t spend an extra $10k on initial buy in for a cayman, which will likely run without issue and hold its value for resale… but they will spend nearly as much for a corvette that needs to have the cylinder heads rebuilt every couple seasons, and barely has the seats bolted to the floor. I truly *want* to want a c6 corvette, but I can’t bring myself to do it. GM discontinued the crate motors for it, and now when people ask about buying them on RRAX they are warned not to because ownership is painful. AS days are numbered. We might as well just ask strano what the next car he would like to win easily with is, and make a class for that while we’re at it.
An old corvette with production numbers around 10000 or whatever is a retarded idea for dominance in BS. C7 grand sport was gifted into SSR and no one wants to own one, or I would say might as well make BS for those cars. They at least make more sense than an older base model.
I truly wish there was another decent autocross club, because the classing and decision making at SCCA is awful. The majority of decisions are made to make sure that people who aren’t very smart stay happy. leadership literally pointed out in the above comments that if a cayman became dominant in AS that the class would end. We’re racing with people who won’t spend an extra $10k on initial buy in for a cayman, which will likely run without issue and hold its value for resale… but they will spend nearly as much for a corvette that needs to have the cylinder heads rebuilt every couple seasons, and barely has the seats bolted to the floor. I truly *want* to want a c6 corvette, but I can’t bring myself to do it. GM discontinued the crate motors for it, and now when people ask about buying them on RRAX they are warned not to because ownership is painful. AS days are numbered. We might as well just ask strano what the next car he would like to win easily with is, and make a class for that while we’re at it.
An old corvette with production numbers around 10000 or whatever is a retarded idea for dominance in BS. C7 grand sport was gifted into SSR and no one wants to own one, or I would say might as well make BS for those cars. They at least make more sense than an older base model.
#53
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
The idea that the Corvette will be dominant in BS is silly, in my opinion. The Supra and the M2/M3 cars are clearly very, very good. Can the Corvette win? Yes. (Especially with a better driver than me.)
Now, if Yokohama would make a 305-19 tire for it, it might be dominant if it could put more power down coming off the corners, but wouldn't the advantage accrue to the other cars as well, all of which accelerate harder than the Corvette with their auto box gearing and massive low-rpm torque? The Tour courses were about the best the Corvette can hope for, in that I was almost or just barely hitting the 2nd gear rev limiter at the fastest point. That probably won't happen on Nats courses. I've been wanting to try the 295-19 Yok, a few came out, but I missed getting a pair. More are not expected until Fall. I'm hoping to be on the new 315-19 Falken in the rear for Nats... supposed to ship late this month. Dave Marcus will be on Yoks in R.T.'s Supra. (Not that I'm in his league as a driver in any case.)
I will continue to pursue my cars' rightful dominance in BS as intended by the SCCA!
Last edited by edfishjr; 07-07-2022 at 01:04 PM.
#54
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
ever since I publicly called out John vitmvas for trying to compare his first gen boxster ownership experience with a GT3 I’ve been persona non grata. I considered applying for an open position this year, but I ended up figuring I would save the effort of writing a resume, and save the seb effort of having to TYFYI
The following users liked this post:
Z3papa (07-07-2022)
#55
Three Wheelin'
AX classing in the SCCA has always been dynamic, political and often mysterious.
I remember when I started in 1970, all the AX classes matched the SCCA Road Racing classes.
When I started to run my 964 in 1999 it was in AS, then it moved to BS and now it is in CS. Interestingly, at the Regional level I was the most competitive in AS.......could have been due to my age .
I remember when I started in 1970, all the AX classes matched the SCCA Road Racing classes.
When I started to run my 964 in 1999 it was in AS, then it moved to BS and now it is in CS. Interestingly, at the Regional level I was the most competitive in AS.......could have been due to my age .
#56
Being involved for a few years now I can safely say there is no political influence, at least with the current SAC. There's an occasional SEB broader vision or personal agenda hinted at but those typically get tempered out.
Very generally, we want full grids, and we want to give the membership what they want (collectively, not the individual.) Reading beyond that, while the passion is appreciated, is silly.
Very generally, we want full grids, and we want to give the membership what they want (collectively, not the individual.) Reading beyond that, while the passion is appreciated, is silly.
#57
https://rennlist.com/forums/autocros...l#post12322866
Just for fun.
back in the day when yommer took my fully prepped 996 40th against the z06 in AS.
still miss that car.
happy to answer any questions regarding 996 legality for BS.
Just for fun.
back in the day when yommer took my fully prepped 996 40th against the z06 in AS.
still miss that car.
happy to answer any questions regarding 996 legality for BS.