Technical data on "flashes"
#16
Race Director
Wow...awesome thread! Thanks for post this Tony. I do not have aTurbo....just a 2009 C2S but flashes interest me in if they improve over what the factory has done.
#17
Intermediate
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montana Rockies
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So these "flashes" help non forced induction Porsche engines too? Just like many other first time Porsche owners, looking into a couple Tuning companies as we speak.
#18
I have tuner cable and access to 4 cars with different ECU's. I have never used the cable. if you can give me some tips in how to pull such info I'll be glad to send it to you for compression
#19
Good post Toby.... not sure I've ever seen a succint analysis of a cars tune like this before.... everyone always gets hooked on what the performance numbers are without much/any thought given as to what the tune is actually doing to produce the performance.
It should be said that on the 996turbo's the IAT's with stock GT2 i/c's and even stock 420ps i/c's were much better controlled than these flashed 997tt's at 5-10degC lower, indicating how much tougher a job tuners have to produce a good 997 tune, as those VTG's run HOT !!
It should be said that on the 996turbo's the IAT's with stock GT2 i/c's and even stock 420ps i/c's were much better controlled than these flashed 997tt's at 5-10degC lower, indicating how much tougher a job tuners have to produce a good 997 tune, as those VTG's run HOT !!
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All the tuners can play with on NA engines is timing and mixture, both of which are pretty well optomized already from the factory. Save your money and don't risk detonation from too much timing advance.
#22
my god those ignition timing logged are completely catastrophic.. Those cars have less power than stock for sure with ignition at 3 and 4 degrees..
However tobby the GT2 intake is completely different than the tt and one can have much more aggressive ignition angle.. mine has around 26-27 at high rpms, however with less boost than your car. Mine goes to 1.6 bar at 4k and stays around 1.45 after..
However tobby the GT2 intake is completely different than the tt and one can have much more aggressive ignition angle.. mine has around 26-27 at high rpms, however with less boost than your car. Mine goes to 1.6 bar at 4k and stays around 1.45 after..
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Toby do you have logs for Engine load and injector duty cycle?
The log showing AFR's in the 10's I would suspect knock activity.
The log showing AFR's in the 10's I would suspect knock activity.
#24
So would I, it would be fascinating......
Hoping to get similar logs in a few weeks for a Proto 996tt monster, a 544PS Cargraphic/RS 997tt and a stock tt....... mine won't be there as I am having rods fitted, apparently two RS cars have have bad failures at my level of tune......
Hoping to get similar logs in a few weeks for a Proto 996tt monster, a 544PS Cargraphic/RS 997tt and a stock tt....... mine won't be there as I am having rods fitted, apparently two RS cars have have bad failures at my level of tune......
My car is definitely not as fast as when I first had the CG powerkit fitted at 2500 miles on the clock. Although that could just be me getting use to the power.
I am now on over 18k miles, and the car hasn't been driven much over the last year. It needs to blow out a lot of the cob-webs, and I am sure the stock clutch is nearly gone given the slips when the weather gets cold. I also have to consider my custom suspension that is more set up for going around corners than accelerating in a straight line. For such air-strip runs I could do with less camber, more positive toe (as the wheels toe-out under acceleration) and more caster for high speed stability.
So we shall see how we get on
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I didn't tick those actual value options, I'm not sure how much it slows the data capture down by ticking too many boxes and the ones I ticked give a pretty good picture.
RS said they wanted to see the PWM reading foy my car which apparently tells them something about what the VTGs are doing ? Any ideas where to find this as I couldn't see it on the Durametric ?
RS said they wanted to see the PWM reading foy my car which apparently tells them something about what the VTGs are doing ? Any ideas where to find this as I couldn't see it on the Durametric ?
#26
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Toby, email me and I'll send you some info. For my customers I usually tick 12 log values. Usually you will have to run a 12v adapter to supply more juice for your laptop.
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the offer Kev. TBH the data I ticked is enough for a good snapshot IMO, boost would be interesting also.... I have one of those 12V-24V convertors but can't be bothered with it !
This PWM is what RS have asked to see to fully confirm that my engine is running maximum power - I am recording 0-300kphs in ~30s at Bruntingthorpe whereas I was repeatedly doing 27s or less at RAF Woodbrige so I thought something was amiss but now am pretty sure it is just the surface of Brunters. I am hopefully taking a trip to Germany later in the summer so will get RS to stick the PIWI on the car and check it properly....
This PWM is what RS have asked to see to fully confirm that my engine is running maximum power - I am recording 0-300kphs in ~30s at Bruntingthorpe whereas I was repeatedly doing 27s or less at RAF Woodbrige so I thought something was amiss but now am pretty sure it is just the surface of Brunters. I am hopefully taking a trip to Germany later in the summer so will get RS to stick the PIWI on the car and check it properly....
#28
So I am a guinea pig for the day then! Charming
My car is definitely not as fast as when I first had the CG powerkit fitted at 2500 miles on the clock. Although that could just be me getting use to the power.
I am now on over 18k miles, and the car hasn't been driven much over the last year. It needs to blow out a lot of the cob-webs, and I am sure the stock clutch is nearly gone given the slips when the weather gets cold. I also have to consider my custom suspension that is more set up for going around corners than accelerating in a straight line. For such air-strip runs I could do with less camber, more positive toe (as the wheels toe-out under acceleration) and more caster for high speed stability.
So we shall see how we get on
My car is definitely not as fast as when I first had the CG powerkit fitted at 2500 miles on the clock. Although that could just be me getting use to the power.
I am now on over 18k miles, and the car hasn't been driven much over the last year. It needs to blow out a lot of the cob-webs, and I am sure the stock clutch is nearly gone given the slips when the weather gets cold. I also have to consider my custom suspension that is more set up for going around corners than accelerating in a straight line. For such air-strip runs I could do with less camber, more positive toe (as the wheels toe-out under acceleration) and more caster for high speed stability.
So we shall see how we get on
#29
I'm thinking it may be time to add a 5bar fpr?