Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Swift spring rubbing stock damper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2017, 12:58 AM
  #1  
911jdb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911jdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Swift spring rubbing stock damper

Running Swift springs with helper springs on a 997.1 GT3 and having trouble with the inner diameter of the spring rubbing the damper. Springs are 550lbs and 7" long with Tarett upper mount and spring adapter. See images

Has anyone experienced this problem before and what was the solution if so?
Attached Images   
Old 05-03-2017, 10:59 AM
  #2  
robbieracer
Rennlist Member
 
robbieracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Tom made a solution for this, start reading at post #62.
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-...-07-gt3-5.html
Old 05-03-2017, 12:25 PM
  #3  
CosmosMpower
Drifting
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Republic
Posts: 2,843
Received 52 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

What spring rates did you choose, is there a noticeable improvement with the OEM PASM shocks?

Did you have to change the top hat to run the aftermarket spring as well?
Old 05-03-2017, 12:34 PM
  #4  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,485
Received 1,730 Likes on 1,058 Posts
Default

looks like a 100 spring with a low rate tender (not sure if helper?)

that's going to be about 560 lbs/in - which is absolutely at the limit, and maybe over, for the stock damper valving. I run a 616 (110 swift) on the front with the TTX dampers, you can run up to about 1000 lbs/in with these shocks. WAY too stiff for street (r comp) tires.

They have a nice chart that converts metric and standard rates:

http://www.swiftsprings.net/products...r-springs.html
Old 05-03-2017, 04:06 PM
  #5  
911jdb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911jdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
What spring rates did you choose, is there a noticeable improvement with the OEM PASM shocks?

Did you have to change the top hat to run the aftermarket spring as well?
Spring rates are 392 front/550 rear with 45lb helpers and yes the stock dampers in the stiffest mode don't provide enough damping. I'm going to install the DSC module and give that a try.

The setup you see is two pieces from Tarett. One is the upper mount and the other is the adapter. I'd like to run a top hat like in the front but haven't done the research to see if you can. Maybe Tom has the solution in his thread.
Old 05-03-2017, 04:46 PM
  #6  
CosmosMpower
Drifting
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Republic
Posts: 2,843
Received 52 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911jdb
Spring rates are 392 front/550 rear with 45lb helpers and yes the stock dampers in the stiffest mode don't provide enough damping. I'm going to install the DSC module and give that a try.

The setup you see is two pieces from Tarett. One is the upper mount and the other is the adapter. I'd like to run a top hat like in the front but haven't done the research to see if you can. Maybe Tom has the solution in his thread.
Despite being over sprung is the performance on track any better with a stiffer spring? OEM is 228/600 so it looks like you've increased the front dramatically and reduced the rear rate a bit. How does the car drive?
Old 05-04-2017, 02:08 AM
  #7  
911jdb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911jdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
Despite being over sprung is the performance on track any better with a stiffer spring? OEM is 228/600 so it looks like you've increased the front dramatically and reduced the rear rate a bit. How does the car drive?
I did more than just the springs so its hard to separate the contribution they had to the whole setup. I think the biggest improvement was the seutp Joey Seely did from Emotion Engineering and all the suggestions he made that keep me within budget.

I would say balance is very good with the new spring rates and the front has more authority now with his setup. It just moves around too much because of the lack of damping. I'll see what the DSC box does here soon. Tarett has also been really helpful in solving this problem and we are going to try a couple of things.
Old 05-04-2017, 09:38 AM
  #8  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Surprised the swift did that, I thought they were supposed to be less prone to deflection than others...or maybe that's just their barrel shaped springs? Normally when you get rub it's where the helper and the main spring come together because of flexing that can happen there. I had to flip my current helper /main setup to keep the junction away from the body.

My shock guy machines thin, clear plastic sleeves to go around the bodies on the shocks where this otherwise can't be avoided. might be the best bet here. You don't want it rubbing through on the very top where it'll make the shock separate.
Old 05-05-2017, 01:06 AM
  #9  
911jdb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911jdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AudiOn19s
Surprised the swift did that, I thought they were supposed to be less prone to deflection than others...or maybe that's just their barrel shaped springs? Normally when you get rub it's where the helper and the main spring come together because of flexing that can happen there. I had to flip my current helper /main setup to keep the junction away from the body.

My shock guy machines thin, clear plastic sleeves to go around the bodies on the shocks where this otherwise can't be avoided. might be the best bet here. You don't want it rubbing through on the very top where it'll make the shock separate.


I thought about machining something just like that out of Delrin to protect the damper and was worried about wearing through the damper too the point I had catastrophic failure. Ive parked the car until I have a fix. Any wear in my book is a complete design failure and unacceptable. I will try shorter springs then a top hat like what TPC sells.
Old 05-05-2017, 01:53 AM
  #10  
thekid96
Rennlist Member
 
thekid96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Orange County
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just get some damn JRZ's already
Old 05-05-2017, 12:05 PM
  #11  
Tom@TPC Racing
Rennlist Member
 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,372
Received 914 Likes on 514 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911jdb
I will try shorter springs then a top hat like what TPC sells.
Shorter springs may reduce the side movement but be advised that shorter springs of the same stiffness rate will not ride the same. On dual purpose street/track cars we use as long a springs as we can, the longer length of spring wire manages the movements better. Also be advised that the rear shocks do not just move straight up and down, they move at a fulcrum motion so it is ideal to have articulation range at the upper bearing to cover the range of the fulcrum motion that doesn't involve the spring in order to reduce lateral spring movement.



Old 05-05-2017, 12:49 PM
  #12  
Tom@TPC Racing
Rennlist Member
 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,372
Received 914 Likes on 514 Posts
Default

OP,

Looks like from your original photo the top plate(with ball bearing) is already there. I suggest replacing the "adapter" with "hat" to allow the ball bearing to articulate. Tarett is good peoples, they may have springs hats that you can buy. Here's a photo of different spring hats, despite of the different colors, and slightly different dimensions, they all have same function. With spring hats you should be using 8" tall main spring+ helper spring.

Old 05-09-2017, 11:44 PM
  #13  
911jdb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911jdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thekid96
Just get some damn JRZ's already
Send me the money Turbo!!! Or better yet give me the ones off the GT3RS that is parked.
Old 05-09-2017, 11:48 PM
  #14  
911jdb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911jdb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom-TPC Racing
OP,

Looks like from your original photo the top plate(with ball bearing) is already there. I suggest replacing the "adapter" with "hat" to allow the ball bearing to articulate. Tarett is good peoples, they may have springs hats that you can buy. Here's a photo of different spring hats, despite of the different colors, and slightly different dimensions, they all have same function. With spring hats you should be using 8" tall main spring+ helper spring.

Tom,

Tarett does not offer hats and in my opinion it would fix the problem. Do you sell them separately at TPC? You can PM me too.
Old 05-09-2017, 11:56 PM
  #15  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,825
Received 1,723 Likes on 1,003 Posts
Default

Your problem is the solid red upper mount. Like Tom said, you need a bearing in the upper mount that will allow some movement thus keeping the mount square with the shock throughout its comptession arc. The solid mount is causing the spring to bow slightly as it compresses thus making contact with the shock.


Quick Reply: Swift spring rubbing stock damper



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:56 AM.