Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

997.1 vs 997.2 price delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2015, 04:11 PM
  #16  
Jlopez55
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Jlopez55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I appreciate all the feedback.

Is the difference still $30k today for similar mileage and equipment? For example, if a white .1 w/ 20k miles goes for $85k, would a 2010 w/ same mileage be around $115k?

5-10 years from now would you expect the prices to even closer together. My guess is yes, since there will be a new generation of gt3s by then and the 997 will be 2 gens back.
Old 05-13-2015, 04:23 PM
  #17  
RSA_27149
Racer
 
RSA_27149's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jlopez55
I have given up on the chances of upgrading my 2007 gt3 for a .2 RS. Just too much money for me to justify for a car I only drive 2000 miles a year.

I considered a 2010 prior to purchasing my 07, but could not justify the $30k delta for a weekend driven gt3 on the street. But now that an RS is not in the cards I am thinking .2 again.

Is the delta still about $30k today? Where do you guys think values will be several years from now? Will they come closer or go the other way? I probably only drive my gt3 at 7/10s at times, is the .2 even worth it or just purely cosmetic?
If you're really going to drive the GT3, then the delta between the two generations is not worth it.

However, both cars being equal (low mileage, excellent condition, etc.), one being .1 and the other .2, the .2 commands the $30k delta today, and will continue to widen going forward.
Porsches, especially GT breed with sunroof will limit its potential.
Old 05-13-2015, 04:45 PM
  #18  
sunnyr
Three Wheelin'
 
sunnyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,362
Received 123 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

To the OP, IMHO, you are trying to do 2 futile things - trying to figure rational behind a car's worth and trying to predict it's future value. There is no rational reason why a green .1RS is 40k-50k more than other colors. Nor could anyone have predicted it would be so, a few years ago. But yet, it is what it is.

Asking people is not going to go anywhere either, everyone will try and justify their choice as the best.

Buy something at the intersection of what you want and what you can and enjoy it.
Old 05-13-2015, 06:03 PM
  #19  
DLJ
Racer
 
DLJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: British Columbia Canada
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I searched for two years, had a budget to work with, and when the right car came along I made a move. I never bought mine thinking of it as an investment (and I am betting most others didn't either) so I don't care about future value that much. I take great care of it, drive it and enjoy it. IMHO Buy what you want to enjoy now, don't wait on the sidelines and dither. The rest is all crystal ball gazing and futile. There are as many opinions out there as there are enthusiasts.
Old 05-14-2015, 11:55 AM
  #20  
Jlopez55
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Jlopez55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSA_27149
Porsches, especially GT breed with sunroof will limit its potential.

I do drive it. At least 2000 miles a year.

Didn't realize the sunroof was that big of a deal, but makes sense considering the focus of the gt3.
Old 05-14-2015, 12:24 PM
  #21  
LewSF
Advanced
 
LewSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Sea Ranch
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2000 miles per year? Well. When I wear mine out...having driven it 2000 miles in the last month on twisty seacoast roads and the like.... I'm calling you for a low miles car!!! Thanks for saving her for me!!!
Old 05-14-2015, 09:31 PM
  #22  
The Mick
Rennlist Member
 
The Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North East
Posts: 358
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DLJ
Well put. I had pretty much the same thoughts on the wings. Neither the .1 or .2 wings were outstanding for me and I've actually become more of a fan of the .1 wing. The tacky badging on the .2 wing wasn't at all to my taste. I saw centerlocks as a definite problem for me and 5 bolt is so much more user-friendly, and reliable, etc.. Using the car as a highway driver, I also enjoy the sunroof and there's no penalty there for performance for me. You just can't extract all of what either the .1 or .2 is capable of on the street anyways. When I was shopping I found the best car to do what I wanted at a price I could live with ( so glad that was two years ago and not now). Can't see a reason to change to a .2 now,especially with the price differential and the fact that I know what I have in my car with two years of ownership under my belt. IMO a lot of this is about personal taste and budget, with performance differences not being as significant.
+1
Old 05-31-2015, 09:58 PM
  #23  
zaitsev
Instructor
 
zaitsev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DLJ
There are as many opinions out there as there are enthusiasts.
I disagree! Some enthusiasts have >1 opinion!

Here's my 2c about the 30k price delta based on 2 categories:
A. Is .2 30k better than .1?
B. Will .2 retain value vs .1, meaning will $30k difference between .1 & .2 remain down the road?

A. .2 is not $30k "better" so the people that get the .2, want the .2
B. If actual performance you, as its pilot, will be able to squeeze out of the car is negligible compared to .2, then why would you give away $30k today with hopes and wishes of one day getting it back? Get .1 and don't give away $30k today - no worrying, end of story. Chances are the gap will lessen, not widen.

Last edited by zaitsev; 05-31-2015 at 10:00 PM. Reason: better phrasing
Old 05-31-2015, 10:43 PM
  #24  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,187
Received 555 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

There is a whole host of reasons why a 997-2 GT3 currently exchanges hands for $30K more than a 997-1. Is it $30K "better"? The market thinks so. Whether the gap will shrink or widen is anyone's guess and a fool's errand to try and predict it.

Is a 997-1 GT3RS twice as good as a 997-1 GT3? Again, the market appears to think so...

Bottom line is, if you like a 997-2 and can afford a 997-2, then buy a 997-2. Because if you're asking yourself the "is it $30K better" question you already know in your heart that this is the car you want. And if you get the "lesser" car you'll always second-guess yourself whether you made the right call.

Best of luck!
Old 06-01-2015, 12:02 AM
  #25  
sin911
Rennlist Member
 
sin911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,127
Received 725 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
Bottom line is, if you like a 997-2 and can afford a 997-2, then buy a 997-2. Because if you're asking yourself the "is it $30K better" question you already know in your heart that this is the car you want. And if you get the "lesser" car you'll always second-guess yourself whether you made the right call.
This is exactly why I bought a .2 GT3 over a .1 GT3 or .1 RS. Do it once, do it right!

Although a pumpkin RS would have been fun, sometimes wonder if that would have been a better choice. You know the saying 'grass is always on the other side...'
Old 06-01-2015, 09:40 AM
  #26  
RAPID
Racer
 
RAPID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In Europe there is practically no price difference between gen1 and gen2 997 GT3 and between gen 1 and gen2 RS, the main reason for price difference is mileage and PTS.
Old 06-01-2015, 10:35 AM
  #27  
Steve Theodore
Rennlist Member
 
Steve Theodore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 1,919
Received 628 Likes on 321 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RAPID
In Europe there is practically no price difference between gen1 and gen2 997 GT3 and between gen 1 and gen2 RS, the main reason for price difference is mileage and PTS.
That's an interesting data point. I suspect the price of any of these examples in Europe isn't exactly cheap though?
Old 06-01-2015, 10:36 AM
  #28  
sfo
Burning Brakes
 
sfo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,087
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

for me, it had to be a 7.2 as only the 7.2 includes PSM, and only 7.2 can be optioned with front axle lift (needed to get into underground garage in London).
Old 06-01-2015, 03:15 PM
  #29  
cbweaver1
Racer
 
cbweaver1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Unless I overlooked it in this string, no mention of the improved RMS on the .2's. I'm going on 5 years with the original RMS and not so much as a drop of oil has come out. This includes 5 months of winter storage over the past 3 years. You're probably not going to get that kind of longevity out of a .1. This is something to consider as OP mentioned he only wants to drive 2K a year. Lack of use and leaky RMS are correlated. Then again with the $ delta between .2 and .1 that leaves you a lot of room in the budget for future RMS replacements if you don't mind having your motor dropped every few years---something to consider. IMO just pull the trigger on the car that strikes your fancy and drive it the way the engineers intended.
Old 06-01-2015, 05:02 PM
  #30  
JG 996T
Rennlist Member
 
JG 996T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,178
Received 526 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Theodore
That's an interesting data point. I suspect the price of any of these examples in Europe isn't exactly cheap though?
Looking at listings on Piston Heads suggests that the price delta's are similar to those we see here in the U.S.


Quick Reply: 997.1 vs 997.2 price delta?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:57 AM.