Hawk equivalent to PFC 08?
#16
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I guess to call them garbage is a bit harsh. I have been running PFC since the PFC97 was their flagship model - 10 years or so. Prior to that I used Hawks and several others. The PFC have all performed exactly as they were advertised - which often led me to mixing models front to rear. I would frequently check into the developments for Hawk and never found a compelling reason to buy them.
The benefits of not needing to bed the pad - just a nuisance, but still necessary, the difference in rotor life between PFC & Hawk, and in a number of cases the operating temperature range made it a complete no-brainer for me.
Ray
The benefits of not needing to bed the pad - just a nuisance, but still necessary, the difference in rotor life between PFC & Hawk, and in a number of cases the operating temperature range made it a complete no-brainer for me.
Ray
#17
Rennlist Member
#18
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member