Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

RS 4.0 For Sale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:19 PM
  #76  
DRPM
Drifting
 
DRPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QC, CA / Abaco BS
Posts: 2,300
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

good to see these elevated values....at least for the 4.0 owners
Old 07-03-2013, 07:32 PM
  #77  
M3EvoBR
Banned
 
M3EvoBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Even not being a 4.0 owner I love to see them high .... just shows what a lot of people think about the automated new upcoming car line.
Old 07-03-2013, 08:01 PM
  #78  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I told Trakcar and JP175 that this car was heading to $300k soon, I didn't expect it to be this soon.

$275k-$325 should be the price range based on the <125 units in U.S., plenty of them already on collectors hands, no more Mezger, no more manual, last RS without crazy gizmos, and last GT3 from a 13 years development over the same engine/transmission and chassis (996 and 997 are almost identical under the skin).

This 4.0RS is more special than a 1973RS, and the 1973 RS in clean conditions is already over the $500 mark (despite of being slower than a Minivan).
Old 07-03-2013, 10:12 PM
  #79  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,658
Received 1,883 Likes on 971 Posts
Default

And the last true street derivative of race car.
Old 07-04-2013, 01:38 AM
  #80  
azmurciev12
Instructor
 
azmurciev12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 230
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

ohhh i'm so glad to have one.
Old 07-04-2013, 11:16 AM
  #81  
Atlas911TT
Instructor
 
Atlas911TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Can someone explain why most prefer no front lift and no PCCB on the 4.0?
Old 07-04-2013, 11:24 AM
  #82  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
I told Trakcar and JP175 that this car was heading to $300k soon, I didn't expect it to be this soon.

$275k-$325 should be the price range based on the <125 units in U.S., plenty of them already on collectors hands, no more Mezger, no more manual, last RS without crazy gizmos, and last GT3 from a 13 years development over the same engine/transmission and chassis (996 and 997 are almost identical under the skin).

This 4.0RS is more special than a 1973RS, and the 1973 RS in clean conditions is already over the $500 mark (despite of being slower than a Minivan).
It's ironic how the things that make the 4.0RS perfectly trackable are the things that make tracking it imprudent (due to high and rising valuations). Most of the 125 cars will likely become collectors pieces, garage kings, or "investments" with <3k miles on their odos.

EDIT: I notice the offering prices on the whole 04-11 Mezger GT3 spectrum creeping up lately.
Old 07-04-2013, 12:29 PM
  #83  
DRPM
Drifting
 
DRPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QC, CA / Abaco BS
Posts: 2,300
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
I told Trakcar and JP175 that this car was heading to $300k soon, I didn't expect it to be this soon.

$275k-$325 should be the price range based on the <125 units in U.S., plenty of them already on collectors hands, no more Mezger, no more manual, last RS without crazy gizmos, and last GT3 from a 13 years development over the same engine/transmission and chassis (996 and 997 are almost identical under the skin).

This 4.0RS is more special than a 1973RS, and the 1973 RS in clean conditions is already over the $500 mark (despite of being slower than a Minivan).
And I understand there were a mere 12 of the kmh versions sold into Canada....with a MSRP of ~ 20k higher than the USA equivalent.

Time will tell how the values play out btwn now and the arrivals of the 991 '3RS....so far I'm happy to both own and drive one!
Old 07-04-2013, 01:05 PM
  #84  
Randy M
Drifting
 
Randy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,367
Received 724 Likes on 334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
EDIT: I notice the offering prices on the whole 04-11 Mezger GT3 spectrum creeping up lately.
As a car enthusiast you accept the depreciation otherwise you'd never have anything. But I know that I try to buy smartly and at least limit the hit as much as possible. The Mezger/manual GT3's have a lot going for them which is why the depreciation 'should' be less than typical going forward.
Old 07-04-2013, 01:05 PM
  #85  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atlas911TT
Can someone explain why most prefer no front lift and no PCCB on the 4.0?
my opinion...

If you're a collector, a car with PCCB will be hard to maintain in 15-25 years from now (no spares), and adding steel rotors to a car equipped with PCCB makes it lose its originality. A collector would go for the Steel brakes. If you're a enthusiast and will track the car, you will replace the PCCB with steel rotors, so why expend the extra $10k to then remove the upgrade (by adding another $3k to the bill to replace with steel brakes). $13k buys a disposable Daily Driver or track-car.

Axle lift goes against the purity of the car, an enthusiast would go for the most simple configuration, the collector would go for simplicity with added cosmetic touches to make the car more unique (Paint-To-Sample, interior materials, stitching, interior color combinations).

PCCB and Axle lift are ideal for cars driven mostly on the streets, that means adding plenty of miles, I doubt average buyers of $300k cars have this intended use.
Old 07-04-2013, 01:18 PM
  #86  
Randy M
Drifting
 
Randy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,367
Received 724 Likes on 334 Posts
Default

I see no purpose for PCCB's. Track guys remove them, I hear that they squeak badly on the street, and very expensive. When I was shopping for a GT3 I almost looked at them as a negative, something I'd have to deal with if I were to buy a GT3 w/ PCCB's. When they wear out they're cost prohibitive to replace. So you replace w/ iron rotors. Then your car is no longer original....I see no point in having them.
Old 07-04-2013, 02:12 PM
  #87  
tripleblack
Racer
 
tripleblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Valid comments in the thread. Having owned 3 P-cars with PCCB I would do it again for a street car. They are cosmetically superior (no rust, less brake dust) and work well. Mine don't squeal. Lest we forget, on most models, the PCCB options comes with a better brake system in the form of bigger calipers, 6 pistons vs. 4 etc.

NJ-GT raises a good point on collector cars though I frankly can't see a collector ever getting close to wearing out a set of PCCB's on a barely street-driven 4.0. And PCCB's are lighter.

I run steels on the track. If Alcon CCX / MovIts etc ever get within 2.5X the price of high-quality steels I'll swap and be done with cracks, rust, and excessive brake dust.
Old 07-04-2013, 05:47 PM
  #88  
scott40
Rennlist Member
 
scott40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 1,926
Received 100 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Randy M
I see no purpose for PCCB's. Track guys remove them, I hear that they squeak badly on the street, and very expensive. When I was shopping for a GT3 I almost looked at them as a negative, something I'd have to deal with if I were to buy a GT3 w/ PCCB's. When they wear out they're cost prohibitive to replace. So you replace w/ iron rotors. Then your car is no longer original....I see no point in having them.
I've had 4 cars with CCBs and they do not squeal on the street. As others have said, for street use, they are superior. For track, not so much. You will never wear them out on the street.
Old 07-04-2013, 06:56 PM
  #89  
GreenLantern
Rennlist Member
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SFO, LAX, SJC, SNA, LAS, IAH, JFK
Posts: 2,845
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
If you're a collector, a car with PCCB will be hard to maintain in 15-25 years from now (no spares)...
Just curious, as I feel like I'm missing some context here... Why?
Old 07-04-2013, 07:14 PM
  #90  
dasams
Rennlist Member
 
dasams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coachella Valley
Posts: 2,217
Received 373 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
If you're a collector, a car with PCCB will be hard to maintain in 15-25 years from now (no spares)
Originally Posted by GreenLantern
Just curious, as I feel like I'm missing some context here... Why?
He's speculating that rotors won't be available. As noted above, a collector will never wear them out from moderate street use but there's always the risk of breakage.


Quick Reply: RS 4.0 For Sale



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:50 PM.