RS 4.0 lap time on The Ring:
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RS 4.0 lap time on The Ring:
"Sport Auto" July edition:
Nürburgring RS 3.8 = 7.33 min
RS 4.0= 7.30 min
Hockenheim RS 3.8 = 1.09,6 min
RS 4.0 = 1.09,5 min
Not such a difference afterall....
Nürburgring RS 3.8 = 7.33 min
RS 4.0= 7.30 min
Hockenheim RS 3.8 = 1.09,6 min
RS 4.0 = 1.09,5 min
Not such a difference afterall....
#2
Rennlist Member
WOW
#4
Rennlist Member
hopefully same driver...
#5
Rennlist Member
Hmm...perhaps Porsche shot itself in the foot by providing 'unusually healthy' press cars for the 3.8 runs...
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
My beer consumption numbers are also better!
I wonder if these Autosport times are BtoG or full flying!
I wonder if these Autosport times are BtoG or full flying!
#10
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
No idea. I think B-G. But the ring is so inconsistent that this difference says nothing.
On the other hand, the identical lap times at Hockenheim are odd.
+50PS and so much more torque should count there for something more.
On the other hand, the identical lap times at Hockenheim are odd.
+50PS and so much more torque should count there for something more.
#11
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full lap! I don't have the RS video, but here is part of the lap in 7.40 of the GT3 done in 2009, it is pretty fast!
(Edited) not quite full lap, but you can see the starting point....
(Edited) not quite full lap, but you can see the starting point....
Last edited by RAPID; 07-26-2011 at 05:40 PM.
#12
Hockenheim .1 second almost suggests that the gearing for the 4.0 isn't correct for it's TQ delivery.
Is it true the redline is 8250?
If that's true, it may just mean that at Hockenheim, they kept running out of rpms and they had to do a gear change(s) that the 3.8 didn't. That and or the driver didn't downshift, thinking they had enough TQ for a certain corner and then left actual HP on the table.
I will say, that when you compare a 997 GT3. mk1 vs a 996 GT3.mk2, you don't see the 997s add 30HP until you hit around 130mph - so on it maybe at Hockenheim it just doesn't show.
For those that have driven Hockenheim, how are the brake zones? If bumpy, ABS may also be an issue as faster just makes bumpy worse for the OE ABS unit.
Is it true the redline is 8250?
If that's true, it may just mean that at Hockenheim, they kept running out of rpms and they had to do a gear change(s) that the 3.8 didn't. That and or the driver didn't downshift, thinking they had enough TQ for a certain corner and then left actual HP on the table.
I will say, that when you compare a 997 GT3. mk1 vs a 996 GT3.mk2, you don't see the 997s add 30HP until you hit around 130mph - so on it maybe at Hockenheim it just doesn't show.
For those that have driven Hockenheim, how are the brake zones? If bumpy, ABS may also be an issue as faster just makes bumpy worse for the OE ABS unit.
#13
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For Hockenheim the comment in the test is that the 3.8 test was done in cold conditions whereas for the 4.0 it was 28°C i.e. tires were getting too hot...
#14
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
I'm hopefully going to get to witness a 3.9 driven there later this year. James/I are heading over to the Empire and then over to ze Fatherland!