Porsche -- planned obsolescence is too slow
02-25-2011, 06:06 PM
#47
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Anyway, it sounds like, in this case, Mueller was misrepresented to some degree and he does have a conventional rolling product cycle.
ps. Have you been to "off topic"? ... it's a noisy zoo at feeding time. Over there, I'd be ostracized as taciturn.
02-25-2011, 06:52 PM
#48
Drop it. If you are as smart as you think you are, you can come up with other ways to make your point instead of foisting your delusional conspiracies theories on the rest of us. Just slip a shrimp on the barbie, open your can of Foster's and give it a rest. Respectfully yours, z356
02-25-2011, 07:33 PM
#49
“My target is to have a life cycle for the whole company, the whole brand, with a result that means we should, every year, have one big product event and a lot of smaller events. That means today, we have four or five products, but together with the Cajun and together maybe with the 550 we have six and we are looking for a seventh model adn then we could have every year one huge event and one bigger facelift, and then we have one and a half huge events and some smaller events..."
02-25-2011, 09:19 PM
#50
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as long as the gt models don't get compromised, then i remain happy.
maybe some economies of scale can help reduce prices?
as long as integrity remains intact......dangerous though, as we've all seen this
route taken by many companies before.
maybe some economies of scale can help reduce prices?
as long as integrity remains intact......dangerous though, as we've all seen this
route taken by many companies before.
02-26-2011, 12:36 AM
#51
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
to the consumers, no matter how low the manufacturing cost drops, it only increases manufacturer's margin, not your saving. dont be fooled.
