Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

sport auto 458, gt3 , gt3 rs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2010, 06:32 AM
  #1  
DD GT3 RD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,322
Received 512 Likes on 217 Posts
Default sport auto 458, gt3 , gt3 rs

Sport auto's review of 458 Italia..contains lap times for gt3/rs/gt2 @ hockenheim and Norschleife....was surprised the gt3 was faster around hockenheim by .1 second and 2 seconds slower at nordschleife. Thought the 458 would of killed the gt3. I dont look into lap times usually, cause i know i will never be close to them and there are so many factors...but id think the ferrari with 560hp vs the gt3 w/ 435 would of killed it. Obviously handling comes into play but it is the 458!

Also cool how the gt3rs is faster than the gt2 @ hockenheim and as quick at the ring...says a lot about its handling being down 80hp and a lot of trq! Also shows downforce ratings, and shows the Ferrari actually has front end lift??? Weird, cause I thought Ferrari was proud of the amount of downforce the car makes with no spoilers and the trick front spoilers.




Last edited by DD GT3 RD; 08-23-2010 at 04:52 PM.
Old 08-23-2010, 08:08 AM
  #2  
RAPID
Racer
 
RAPID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you by any chance know the time for the M3GTS?
Old 08-23-2010, 08:42 AM
  #3  
Condor Man
Three Wheelin'
 
Condor Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Californian
Posts: 1,453
Received 299 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Having that massive rear wing and wider front tires would help the GT3RS.

If you put a GT3 wing on the 458 and some more front aero, the 458 could probably do sub 7.20.
Old 08-23-2010, 09:16 AM
  #4  
911rox
Rennlist Member
 
911rox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Regretfully not at a track... :(
Posts: 2,571
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

^ Funny thing is that Ferrari claim over 300kg of down force compared to the 170 odd from the RS (according to the recent comparison video by Chris Harris- he highly doudted their claims too)... So I doubt this is the problem...
Old 08-23-2010, 09:23 AM
  #5  
Condor Man
Three Wheelin'
 
Condor Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Californian
Posts: 1,453
Received 299 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

I agree, that stat is B/S!

If that was the case, then F1 Cars are GT3 Cars wouldn't have rear wings.
Old 08-23-2010, 09:24 AM
  #6  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911rox
^ Funny thing is that Ferrari claim over 300kg of down force compared to the 170 odd from the RS (according to the recent comparison video by Chris Harris- he highly doudted their claims too)... So I doubt this is the problem...
I am wondering just how Ferrari can be so far out on their 300kg claim - the 31kg tested at 200kph equates to ~70kg at maximum speed.....
Old 08-23-2010, 09:29 AM
  #7  
Condor Man
Three Wheelin'
 
Condor Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Californian
Posts: 1,453
Received 299 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Agreed....

At least Porsche always underestimates!
Old 08-23-2010, 09:37 AM
  #8  
911rox
Rennlist Member
 
911rox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Regretfully not at a track... :(
Posts: 2,571
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Fat Luigi was probably sitting on the rear lid and creating the downforce with the twisty parts of his moustache... lol... Who knows, these italians do only one thing perfectly- creating spontaneously combusting cars...
Old 08-23-2010, 09:41 AM
  #9  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Condor Man
Agreed....

At least Porsche always underestimates!
Well not really, the same test revealed the GT3RS downforce not quite as high as Porsche claim:



The Ferrari one is so far out that I wonder that maybe Ferrari test differently ? The downforce is supposed to come manily from the underbody airflow and rear diffuser - is it possible that works differently on the road to the Mercedes wind tunnel ?
Old 08-23-2010, 01:01 PM
  #10  
GT3
Three Wheelin'
 
GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,889
Received 280 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RAPID
Do you by any chance know the time for the M3GTS?
The ring time was 1:40. Same as the Mk2 GT3.
Old 08-23-2010, 01:03 PM
  #11  
GT3
Three Wheelin'
 
GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,889
Received 280 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

I secretly keep hoping(Pretty sure it will) the MP4-12C will be very close to the GT2 RS 7:18 time or even better
Old 08-23-2010, 01:42 PM
  #12  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3
I secretly keep hoping(Pretty sure it will) the MP4-12C will be very close to the GT2 RS 7:18 time or even better
If the 12C isn't at that 7:18 pace, I'd be surprised and I'm sure the McLaren engineers would be horrified.

As for the "revelation" that a lower-powered 911 puts down real world lap times equal to (or better than) a higher-powered <insert brand here> well, that was news circa 1964, since then, it really shouldn't come as a surprise.

There are those who look at one or more of "mid engine" or "push rod dampers" or horsepower or, in the case of McLaren, an impressive depth of engineering expertise and (what I think is) a brilliant machine overall and draw the conclusion that the 911 has been bettered. But the practical reality is the two fastest production road cars are set to be the GT3 RS and the forthcoming GT2 RS. The "3" is the apex of naturally aspirated cars on the road today. The "2" will be the apex predator of all cars on the road today ... : )
Old 08-23-2010, 02:06 PM
  #13  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,783
Received 3,601 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT3
The ring time was 1:40. Same as the Mk2 GT3.
you mean 7:48 ...

http://www.bmwblog.com/2010/08/21/bm...t-nurburgring/
Old 08-23-2010, 02:12 PM
  #14  
911SLOW
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
911SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Athens
Posts: 11,010
Likes: 0
Received 126 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carrera GT
If the 12C isn't at that 7:18 pace, I'd be surprised and I'm sure the McLaren engineers would be horrified.

As for the "revelation" that a lower-powered 911 puts down real world lap times equal to (or better than) a higher-powered <insert brand here> well, that was news circa 1964, since then, it really shouldn't come as a surprise.

There are those who look at one or more of "mid engine" or "push rod dampers" or horsepower or, in the case of McLaren, an impressive depth of engineering expertise and (what I think is) a brilliant machine overall and draw the conclusion that the 911 has been bettered. But the practical reality is the two fastest production road cars are set to be the GT3 RS and the forthcoming GT2 RS. The "3" is the apex of naturally aspirated cars on the road today. The "2" will be the apex predator of all cars on the road today ... : )
Any information on the standard tyres of the McLaren? What was on in the presentation?
I doubt they ll go below 7:30 with any 100% street tyre.

John
Old 08-23-2010, 02:42 PM
  #15  
GT3
Three Wheelin'
 
GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,889
Received 280 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Thanks for the info. I believe the 7:40 had been originally said by BMW, when they were releasing it.


Quick Reply: sport auto 458, gt3 , gt3 rs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:56 PM.