Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

So which car would you put your money??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2010, 10:05 AM
  #1  
Condor Man
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Condor Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Californian
Posts: 1,453
Received 299 Likes on 121 Posts
Default So which car would you put your money??

Sounds better with headphones in!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HIww...eature=related
Old 07-15-2010, 10:37 AM
  #2  
scott40
Rennlist Member
 
scott40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 1,924
Received 99 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Nice!
Old 07-15-2010, 10:59 AM
  #3  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Much closer than I expected.
Old 07-15-2010, 11:52 AM
  #4  
MM3.9GT3
Rennlist Member
 
MM3.9GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

It is a SharkWerks 3.9. I wonder if the F430 is stock?
Old 07-15-2010, 12:14 PM
  #5  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MM3.9GT3
It is a SharkWerks 3.9. I wonder if the F430 is stock?
That's the surprising thing. At first, I thought it was a Scuderia (stripes) but it's clearly a 430 (exhaust pipes and engine bay) so I'm surprised to see it stay in touch with the Froggie 3.9 ... maybe a rolling start to negate the F1 box and launch control would be a better comparison?
Old 07-15-2010, 12:20 PM
  #6  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

But a stock 430 makes 490hps already.. w/ the exhaust.. Probably some more.. So I'm sure it makes similar horsepower as the 3.9...

One would expect them to be close, no?!
Old 07-15-2010, 12:23 PM
  #7  
MM3.9GT3
Rennlist Member
 
MM3.9GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,115
Received 44 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carrera GT
That's the surprising thing. At first, I thought it was a Scuderia (stripes) but it's clearly a 430 (exhaust pipes and engine bay) so I'm surprised to see it stay in touch with the Froggie 3.9 ... maybe a rolling start to negate the F1 box and launch control would be a better comparison?
In a 1 mile test, launch control and F1 should not be a big factor - correct? In the 1/4 mile, yes.
Old 07-15-2010, 12:25 PM
  #8  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

If it is a bet, I would put my money on the Sharky 3.9 GT3 RS. The car is rated at 500Hp, with whp in the 450whp range, Kermit is lightened, close to 150 lbs lighter than a stock 997.1 GT3 RS (around 3,000 lbs with no fuel).

The F430 in the video is a standard F430 with the EvoMSit tune, less power to the wheels than Kermit. It is also a heavier car (over 3,200 lbs with no fuel).

Power to the wheels is what matters. A standard F430 is rated at 483Hp, and puts down just 400-410whp. The 2010 GT3 is rated at 435Hp, and puts down near 400 whp.

The GT3 launches extremely well, actually all RWD 911s do. The F430 doesn't launch well, as it doesn't have launch control in the U.S. version, it launches bad actually.

If it is a car to choose (rather than a bet), I would still take Kermit.
Old 07-15-2010, 01:07 PM
  #9  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
If it is a bet, I would put my money on the Sharky 3.9 GT3 RS. The car is rated at 500Hp, with whp in the 450whp range, Kermit is lightened, close to 150 lbs lighter than a stock 997.1 GT3 RS (around 3,000 lbs with no fuel).

The F430 in the video is a standard F430 with the EvoMSit tune, less power to the wheels than Kermit. It is also a heavier car (over 3,200 lbs with no fuel).

Power to the wheels is what matters. A standard F430 is rated at 483Hp, and puts down just 400-410whp. The 2010 GT3 is rated at 435Hp, and puts down near 400 whp.

The GT3 launches extremely well, actually all RWD 911s do. The F430 doesn't launch well, as it doesn't have launch control in the U.S. version, it launches bad actually.

If it is a car to choose (rather than a bet), I would still take Kermit.
Right. Just looking at the frog compared to a stock 997.2 RS, the lean mean grean machean (sorry) punches above its weight. Give or take the hole shot, I think the frog deserves a shorter diff. I think Alex was keeping the stock ratios to be clear that the performance of the car is entirely the 3.9.
Old 07-15-2010, 01:31 PM
  #10  
Giantviper
Burning Brakes
 
Giantviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 1,138
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Cool Video. Thank you for sharing.

Oh and yes I would take the GT3 over the F-Car.
Old 07-15-2010, 01:40 PM
  #11  
911SLOW
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
911SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Athens
Posts: 11,010
Likes: 0
Received 126 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
If it is a bet, I would put my money on the Sharky 3.9 GT3 RS. The car is rated at 500Hp, with whp in the 450whp range, Kermit is lightened, close to 150 lbs lighter than a stock 997.1 GT3 RS (around 3,000 lbs with no fuel).

The F430 in the video is a standard F430 with the EvoMSit tune, less power to the wheels than Kermit. It is also a heavier car (over 3,200 lbs with no fuel).

Power to the wheels is what matters. A standard F430 is rated at 483Hp, and puts down just 400-410whp. The 2010 GT3 is rated at 435Hp, and puts down near 400 whp.

The GT3 launches extremely well, actually all RWD 911s do. The F430 doesn't launch well, as it doesn't have launch control in the U.S. version, it launches bad actually.

If it is a car to choose (rather than a bet), I would still take Kermit.
Originally Posted by Carrera GT
Right. Just looking at the frog compared to a stock 997.2 RS, the lean mean grean machean (sorry) punches above its weight. Give or take the hole shot, I think the frog deserves a shorter diff. I think Alex was keeping the stock ratios to be clear that the performance of the car is entirely the 3.9.

NJ and Carrera I agree with your remarks about weight and gear ratios.
My Rs tuning 3.6 6GT3 with short R&P pulls from standrard 430 as this Green car from standing and from rolling 2nds. *both with launch and without
My friends 7GT3 with exhaust has no chance vs the 430.

However I am little surprized given the specs of the 3.9 litres conversion so maybe it was a bad launch.

John
Old 07-16-2010, 03:46 AM
  #12  
MGS996
Racer
 
MGS996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice vid :-)
Old 07-16-2010, 04:16 AM
  #13  
Nugget
Rennlist Member
 
Nugget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tejas Hill Country
Posts: 1,920
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

If my goal was just to drive in a straight line I wouldn't want either of those cars.
Old 07-16-2010, 09:15 AM
  #14  
Condor Man
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Condor Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Californian
Posts: 1,453
Received 299 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nugget
If my goal was just to drive in a straight line I wouldn't want either of those cars.
Never the less, this Vid still shows the power of these cars which I imagine to be sensational coming out of corners.

I'd take the GT3 as well.
Old 07-16-2010, 02:04 PM
  #15  
triode
Rennlist Member
 
triode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,138
Received 71 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Sharkey posted elsewhere that the 430 was modded to 520 HP; this would explain closer than expected result with 500 HP 3.9.


Quick Reply: So which car would you put your money??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:41 AM.