2010 GT3RS Sport Auto
#5
That first picture actually bugs me now that I look at it. The wing looks like a total afterthought with the aluminum (?) frame that holds it up IMO. I look at that picture and see the distinct lines of the car and then that thing stuck on. Could just be the lighting and/or might look better in body color or black.
#6
That first picture actually bugs me now that I look at it. The wing looks like a total afterthought with the aluminum (?) frame that holds it up IMO. I look at that picture and see the distinct lines of the car and then that thing stuck on. Could just be the lighting and/or might look better in body color or black.
#7
That first picture actually bugs me now that I look at it. The wing looks like a total afterthought with the aluminum (?) frame that holds it up IMO. I look at that picture and see the distinct lines of the car and then that thing stuck on. Could just be the lighting and/or might look better in body color or black.
its all in the eye of the beholder I guess ... I just dont like any of the color schemes at all!
Trending Topics
#8
Looks like those wing supports easily unbolt?
So here's a stupid question... using the car in the States (with our silly low speed limits), would you ever consider driving the car with just the duck spoiler base? Bolt it back on for track weekends, unbolt for the daily commute.
Take the graphics and the spoiler off and you have one hell of a stealth car... if an RS could ever be stealth?
So here's a stupid question... using the car in the States (with our silly low speed limits), would you ever consider driving the car with just the duck spoiler base? Bolt it back on for track weekends, unbolt for the daily commute.
Take the graphics and the spoiler off and you have one hell of a stealth car... if an RS could ever be stealth?
#10
Forget the car....look who's driving...it's "Broom Hilda" or the "wicked witch of the East" Or the funny looking dude who played the villain in the Charlie's Angles remake!!!
Last edited by texasviany; 01-26-2010 at 05:51 AM. Reason: more details