Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Heads Up - GT2 now on Porsche US site

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2007, 12:41 AM
  #16  
stuka
Pro
 
stuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mvd
Just a casual observer here but geez, get over yourself already.
I have two plus years of on and off track experiences with 996 Turbo and Please Save Me.

I took a bath and got rid of it, because I hated PSM.

Now, I am happy with my no sunroof, manual only, no electronic GT2. And as a current GT2 owner, I am naturally interested in what the new one is going to be like.

So, what exactly do I need to get over?

I also hate wet sumper tippy cabs, do I need to get over that also?

What else should I get over?
Old 07-31-2007, 01:16 AM
  #17  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuka
So now having basic RWD skills = manly?

It would seem that those who cannot control oversteers are the problem, no?
Its not just about lateral stability, you can't predict the conditions between the tires and the road 100% of the time. The system can be disabled 100% of the time for the very few owners that drive on the track or for those that don't like the system and the addition of PSM really doesn't cost Porsche anything extra, the sensors are already there. So why is it such a problem?
Old 07-31-2007, 01:32 AM
  #18  
stuka
Pro
 
stuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
Its not just about lateral stability, you can't predict the conditions between the tires and the road 100% of the time. The system can be disabled 100% of the time for the very few owners that drive on the track or for those that don't like the system and the addition of PSM really doesn't cost Porsche anything extra, the sensors are already there. So why is it such a problem?
Road condition is not important. If you can drive RWD car sideways with any power (E46 M3 for example), you don't need PSM, or any traction control. I would rather rest easy knowing that I know how to control the car, than to rely on the Please Save Me.

Oh, and mark my words. There will be spectacular crashes of 997 GT2's on the track. PSM does not defy the law of physics. And you know what happens when spectacular crashes happen on the track? That's right, the track gets shut down, everybody loses track time.

Also, LSD has to be designed to work with the PSM. The current GT2 has a very agressive LSD, which is teh awesomeness.
Old 07-31-2007, 04:00 AM
  #19  
YA911Fan
Burning Brakes
 
YA911Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I tend to agree with stuka. All these nannies make it impossible to determine how much is skill and how much is automation. False confidence from having a safety net is not a good thing.

I think they should have stopped the nannification after ABS.
Old 07-31-2007, 07:18 AM
  #20  
SamuliS
Track Day
 
SamuliS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, isnt it the problem with all new cars, they'r more PS2 GT4 than real life driving, with all new gadget's that are trying to keep the car on road.
Still, with PSM or not, it seems to be one spectacular car, with huge amount of power.
Old 07-31-2007, 08:34 AM
  #21  
Lord_Galva
Burning Brakes
 
Lord_Galva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Huzza for the 968 with nothing but ABS.
Old 07-31-2007, 09:47 AM
  #22  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,053
Received 1,228 Likes on 600 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YA911Fan
I think they should have stopped the nannification after ABS.

Pffffft... ABS is for girls. You all are a bunch of power steering, air conditioned, distributorless weenies. If any of us were really that good, someone would be sponsoring us to drive their car(s).
Old 07-31-2007, 03:01 PM
  #23  
stuka
Pro
 
stuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
Pffffft... ABS is for girls. You all are a bunch of power steering, air conditioned, distributorless weenies. If any of us were really that good, someone would be sponsoring us to drive their car(s).
That is not the point.

When I nailed an apex, I want to know it's me, not the computer.

Part of what makes DE fun is that you are making yourself better, and you enjoy interacting with your car.

It means shifting, turning, braking, manage the turn in, apex, and staying on the track, etc.

Electronics have allowed hamfisted drivers to think that they are fast, and cause spectacular crashes, think shooting across the track backwards, hitting the armoco, then shooting forward back into the track where cars are still going more than 100mph while the corner worker is furiously waving the yellow.

Guys like that would have had had to learn how to actually drive their cars if they didn't have electornics. And they would have had their oh **** moment at a much slower speed, at the slower group, where it is safer. Rather than pulling stunts like that and causing all of us to lose track time.
Old 07-31-2007, 03:21 PM
  #24  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,053
Received 1,228 Likes on 600 Posts
Default

In my years of tracking, the only thing I can associate wrecks/loss of control to are driver error (far and away #1), and the occasional mechanical breakdown (distant #2). I hardly think that electronics have increased the hazards on the track. Any situation sending a car into the armco with PSM "on" would have crunched with PSM "off" as well. Plenty of low-tech Miatas and such plow the infields along with the uber-gadget cars.

PSM has thankfully unf*cked my line when I have pinched a 120+mph turn too hard. Believe me, it is not something to be forgotten or gain false confidence from.
Old 07-31-2007, 03:51 PM
  #25  
stuka
Pro
 
stuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
PSM has thankfully unf*cked my line when I have pinched a 120+mph turn too hard. Believe me, it is not something to be forgotten or gain false confidence from.
You sound like a very reasonable and cautious track driver, that is what I want when I drive.

The event I described happened at Laguna Seca.

There was also a spectacular ping pong action down turn 6 at Sears Point, also by hamfisted driver with false confidence from electornics.

And how about another who advacend to the fast group without even knowing WTF oversteer is. The guy had to rely on it to not spun into the wall running clockwise at Button Willow.

And the worse part is I am in the same run group as them. Think losing track time, think sitting idle at the pits waiting for the debris to clear without water bottle (half hour run time, you get off and chuck water).

None of these shumachers would have had anywhere near as spectacular of a crash had they turn off the damn thing earlier in their driving experiences and actually learn WTF to do when they overdrawn on the traction account. Instead, they rely on electronics and it failed them, and caused me to lose track time.
Old 07-31-2007, 03:54 PM
  #26  
iLLM3
Drifting
 
iLLM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY, LI
Posts: 2,284
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by stuka
Nah, with Please Save Me, it won't be as interesting to drive as our GT2.
Well, listen. I will be always the first to say, I want the rawest, grittiest most mechanical car with bare essentials, no nanny aids and so on.. My GT2 even with monster power still does not need any PSM or TC functions, the car was built to put the power to the ground and be as planted as possible when driven correctly, I have surprised MANY people in car and outside where they have an aura of fear built up thinking it is the most dangerous thing ever..

While I don't think the car needs it, I can guarentee it will not interfere with the cars driving ONE BIT, just like the 997 GT3.. The car will still be raw and nimble, even more so with the better technology (997TT and 997GT3 both prove it) and with the VTG's, 2 step LC system the car will not dissapoint, I for one cannot wait!
Old 07-31-2007, 04:01 PM
  #27  
NelsonF
Pro
 
NelsonF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fallbrook, Ca.
Posts: 507
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default 997 GT2

Agreed, now let's see what Porsche does in terms of build volume so that I can determine if I want to pick one up early or later.
Old 07-31-2007, 04:21 PM
  #28  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,053
Received 1,228 Likes on 600 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuka
You sound like a very reasonable and cautious track driver, that is what I want when I drive.

The event I described happened at Laguna Seca.

There was also a spectacular ping pong action down turn 6 at Sears Point, also by hamfisted driver with false confidence from electornics.

And how about another who advacend to the fast group without even knowing WTF oversteer is. The guy had to rely on it to not spun into the wall running clockwise at Button Willow.

And the worse part is I am in the same run group as them. Think losing track time, think sitting idle at the pits waiting for the debris to clear without water bottle (half hour run time, you get off and chuck water).

None of these shumachers would have had anywhere near as spectacular of a crash had they turn off the damn thing earlier in their driving experiences and actually learn WTF to do when they overdrawn on the traction account. Instead, they rely on electronics and it failed them, and caused me to lose track time.
Reminds me of an event I went to in May. I think the whole day I was able to string 3 clean laps together between yellow and black flags. This was a solo-only combined advanced run group/club race practice day for the Viper run-offs. It got to be so frustrating I packed up and left. I heard things got even worse after I left, including a couple of catastrophic losses.
Old 07-31-2007, 10:52 PM
  #29  
Coochas
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Coochas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 01776
Posts: 9,960
Received 439 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Get over yourself Stuka....I mean, geeeeez.
Old 07-31-2007, 11:00 PM
  #30  
stuka
Pro
 
stuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coochas
Get over yourself Stuka....I mean, geeeeez.
Have you driven a GT2? Have you driven one on the track? How about a Turbo? How many track days have you had with these cars?

I posted about my experience and why I think PSM sucks, and all you can muster up is "get over yourself?"

How about contributing something from your experience driving the GT2 or the Turbo?


Quick Reply: Heads Up - GT2 now on Porsche US site



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:32 AM.