Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

997.2 GT3 RS engine failure...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2024, 02:40 AM
  #46  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,045
Received 1,859 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nle
WC51 resonance intake tube recall was only issued for the 997.2 3.8 and 4.0 RS. The 997.1 GT3/RS and 997.2 GT3 did not have the same intake flap issues.
997.1/.2Cup and 991.1Cup Mergers used the 997.1GT3/RS/997.2GT3 street intake manifold and are supposedly not susceptible to this. I would be curious what exactly the difference is in the 7.2RS and 4.0RS manifold is that has the flaws.
The following 2 users liked this post by powdrhound:
prl (05-14-2024), Robocop305 (05-14-2024)
Old 05-14-2024, 08:06 AM
  #47  
rafter75
Rennlist Member
 
rafter75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 123
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Could all this be avoided by replacing with a Dundon intake?
Old 05-14-2024, 10:48 AM
  #48  
RAudi Driver
Nordschleife Master
 
RAudi Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 9,100
Received 2,909 Likes on 1,723 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nle
WC51 resonance intake tube recall was only issued for the 997.2 3.8 and 4.0 RS. The 997.1 GT3/RS and 997.2 GT3 did not have the same intake flap issues.
So the question is, did Elliot's car get the recall fix? If not then would Porsche step up and foot the bill? If he did get the recall fix, would Porsche step up and foot the bill? If Porsche did foot the bill, would hey foot it at Sharkwerks?
The following 2 users liked this post by RAudi Driver:
Breakthru (05-16-2024), Robocop305 (05-14-2024)
Old 05-14-2024, 12:56 PM
  #49  
vma1788
Rennlist Member
 
vma1788's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 335 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rafter75
Could all this be avoided by replacing with a Dundon intake?
Yeah, the Dundon does not have flaps. It does however make the low end pretty lazy but bumps mid range HP a ton and 1 less thing to worry about. 2 big pros for 1 negligible con.

Elliot- bummer to hear man. How do you know this is what happened without tearing it down?
The following users liked this post:
Elliotw44 (05-18-2024)
Old 05-14-2024, 01:30 PM
  #50  
FLT6SPD
Rennlist Member
 
FLT6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,129
Received 649 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

The distributor tube is physically smaller on the 3.6GT3/RS and 3.8GT3, the larger one is on the 3.8RS and 4.0 and mates up to the larger distributor tubes that mount to the heads.

The distributor tube on the cup is 997.110.116.90 on the 3.6 and 3.8GT3 is both 90 or 91, why they stayed with that on the cup is prob the same reason they use restrictor plates on the throttle body, precise horsepower control due to race regulations

Originally Posted by powdrhound
997.1/.2Cup and 991.1Cup Mergers used the 997.1GT3/RS/997.2GT3 street intake manifold and are supposedly not susceptible to this. I would be curious what exactly the difference is in the 7.2RS and 4.0RS manifold is that has the flaws.

Last edited by FLT6SPD; 05-14-2024 at 01:55 PM.
Old 05-14-2024, 01:33 PM
  #51  
RAudi Driver
Nordschleife Master
 
RAudi Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 9,100
Received 2,909 Likes on 1,723 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rafter75
Could all this be avoided by replacing with a Dundon intake?
It sure could but at a cost.

Question is, could it be avoided with the WC-51 recall completed? If I assume ye, then I'm going to assume that Elliot did not get the recall work done to his car, which brings me back to my original question. Will Porsche foot the repair bill?
Old 05-14-2024, 01:58 PM
  #52  
Vocan
Rennlist Member
 
Vocan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 454
Received 293 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RAudi Driver
It sure could but at a cost.

Question is, could it be avoided with the WC-51 recall completed? If I assume ye, then I'm going to assume that Elliot did not get the recall work done to his car, which brings me back to my original question. Will Porsche foot the repair bill?
Sounds like the recall work is still not a guaranteed fix based on the original poster of the thread. Seems like he had the recall done and it still failed, though maybe there were other factors at play?
Old 05-14-2024, 02:19 PM
  #53  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,045
Received 1,859 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FLT6SPD
The distributor tube is physically smaller on the 3.6GT3/RS and 3.8GT3, the larger one is on the 3.8RS and 4.0 and mates up to the larger distributor tubes that mount to the heads.

The distributor tube on the cup is 997.110.116.90 on the 3.6 and 3.8GT3 is both 90 or 91, why they stayed with that on the cup is prob the same reason they use restrictor plates on the throttle body, precise horsepower control due to race regulations
I get the size difference of the distributor tube, just curious what mechanically is different that would make the 91 (RS) valves, or rather the attachment hardware of the valves, susceptible to coming loose and falling apart compared to those used in the 90 distributor tube. I have a 991.1Cup motor that we will be using as a core for an upcoming 4.0 build and we will take a detailed look at the valves and take whatever precautions are necessary to make sure the hardware on these can't come loose. Something as simple as a small tack weld may be in order for peace of mind. I also have a spare 3.8Cup intake (90) in my parts bin and will take it apart when I get a minute to look at what we are dealing with. Again, the hardware may not be representative of the 91 however by the sound of it. Does anyone know what the flapper recall on the 91 intake actually entailed?
Old 05-14-2024, 06:09 PM
  #54  
FLT6SPD
Rennlist Member
 
FLT6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 2,129
Received 649 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

If you show me yours ill show you mine... I have a new RS/4.0 distributor tube I can take some detailed pics, prob cannot get to it until after memorial day though.

Originally Posted by powdrhound
I get the size difference of the distributor tube, just curious what mechanically is different that would make the 91 (RS) valves, or rather the attachment hardware of the valves, susceptible to coming loose and falling apart compared to those used in the 90 distributor tube. I have a 991.1Cup motor that we will be using as a core for an upcoming 4.0 build and we will take a detailed look at the valves and take whatever precautions are necessary to make sure the hardware on these can't come loose. Something as simple as a small tack weld may be in order for peace of mind. I also have a spare 3.8Cup intake (90) in my parts bin and will take it apart when I get a minute to look at what we are dealing with. Again, the hardware may not be representative of the 91 however by the sound of it. Does anyone know what the flapper recall on the 91 intake actually entailed?
Old 05-14-2024, 06:21 PM
  #55  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,045
Received 1,859 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FLT6SPD
If you show me yours ill show you mine... I have a new RS/4.0 distributor tube I can take some detailed pics, prob cannot get to it until after memorial day though.
Easy enough. I'll post up the pics this weekend.
Old 05-14-2024, 06:57 PM
  #56  
EMpunker
Rennlist Member
 
EMpunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 628
Received 249 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

How common is this issue? Besides the coolant lines failing, these cars seem to be pretty bullet-proof...?
Old 05-15-2024, 03:42 PM
  #57  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,190
Received 555 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Elliotw44
Well add another 3.8 to the list. Just happened to me a few weeks ago. Intake flap failed and the small pieces fell into the engine. Not sure if I have the updated part number on the center intake section. Full damage report pending.
That happened to me as well two years ago. The arm that holds the intake butterfly flap broke. A piece of it fell inside cylinder 5, causing catastrophic damage and necessitating a full engine rebuild, totaling over $35K. That was the updated intake that broke, it had been changed during the recall in 2013. Mind you, the newest version of the intake Porsche now sells is a different part number than the recall-updated version. So at some point they've decided that version wasn't good enough...

I fought Porsche long and hard for a year to cover the engine rebuild, since the recalled part failed. I even contacted NHTSA, etc., etc. In the end they did nothing. Really poor customer service.

I am not confident that the newest version of the intake tube is going to be robust over time. So I asked the shop that rebuilt the engine to create special screens on both sides of the intake tube, to catch shrapnel if the arm breaks again:

View this post on Instagram
The following 2 users liked this post by ilko:
balefire (05-29-2024), Elliotw44 (05-15-2024)
Old 05-15-2024, 06:56 PM
  #58  
Elliotw44
Rennlist Member
 
Elliotw44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,115
Received 1,007 Likes on 418 Posts
Default

Confirmed today my car had WC512 completed in 07/2013. Still need the part number off my cars center section.
Old 05-15-2024, 07:51 PM
  #59  
RAudi Driver
Nordschleife Master
 
RAudi Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 9,100
Received 2,909 Likes on 1,723 Posts
Default

I don't know if that's a good or bad thing. What's your next more Elliot?
Old 05-15-2024, 08:24 PM
  #60  
Elliotw44
Rennlist Member
 
Elliotw44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,115
Received 1,007 Likes on 418 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RAudi Driver
I don't know if that's a good or bad thing. What's your next more Elliot?
  • Understand the total damage and how much needs to be replaced on my car.
  • Understand which part number failed on my car. The starting part number is 997.110.116.90. The latest part number is 997.110.116.95. That will help me understand if my failure is an intermediate revision or the final revision. Given that my car had the WC512 completed, I expect the part on my car to be in the range of 91-95.
    • if it's the final revision, look for an alternative solution like @ilko
    • if intermediate revision, go with the latest revision
  • Pay the bill and get the car running again ASAP.
    • I called Sharkwerks about an engine build. The waitlist is out to 2026, which is out of the question given that I don't want the car down for 1.5 years.
It's a fool's goal in my mind to try to get Porsche to pay for this, being that it's so far out of warranty and production. They mostly care about selling the latest and greatest.
The following 3 users liked this post by Elliotw44:
balefire (05-29-2024), Breakthru (05-16-2024), SupraSaiyan (05-15-2024)


Quick Reply: 997.2 GT3 RS engine failure...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:52 AM.