Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would you have gotten a 996 Turbo over your 997?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2017, 01:12 AM
  #31  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,387
Received 1,424 Likes on 890 Posts
Default

I've owned a 996 C4S, a 997 TT, and a 991 TTS. Each of them have things that I like. The 996 had an old-school feeling to it, especially compared to the 991. I loved the rear view of the 996, and I think it had the best steering of the bunch. That being said, the 997 interior was a huge upgrade over the 996. The 996 headlights never bothered me; they aren't as ugly as the headlight covers that many people like.

I would consider a 996 GT3, or perhaps a 2005 996 TTS cabriolet. Other than that, I prefer a 997 or a 991.
Old 06-22-2017, 10:31 AM
  #32  
Saaboteur
Burning Brakes
 
Saaboteur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 1,065
Received 99 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

I actually don't mind the 996 exterior look, especially the face lifted cars. But you can't drive a car from the outside, and for me the interior differences was the deal breaker and led me to 997 ownership.
Old 06-22-2017, 10:45 AM
  #33  
SpeedyD
Burning Brakes
 
SpeedyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,212
Received 167 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

No, but the 996 turbo is a great value.
Old 06-22-2017, 12:28 PM
  #34  
zirrah
Drifting
 
zirrah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,039
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTsilber
you honestly think the 993 interior and cockpit is better than the 996?
I do too. The 993 interior has a classic, nostalgic sort of look to it. The 996 looks like something from a Camry circa about 1997. Now, that said, the 996 interior looks much better in person than in pictures.
Old 06-22-2017, 01:49 PM
  #35  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,309
Received 395 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Funny (or sad) to see that the comments on the 996 center on interior and doodads fluff. Perhaps I missed it, but no comments on its smaller/nimbler footprint and better steering.
Old 06-22-2017, 01:58 PM
  #36  
Iceter
Drifting
 
Iceter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 2,612
Received 413 Likes on 243 Posts
Default

I considered a 996 turbo when I was looking for a 997. Having driven them both I have to say from a purely performance oriented viewpoint, the turbo has my vote.

But, in my case (YMMV), the car was going to be a daily driver and the more modern amenities in the 997.2 were enough to sway me.

And I won't lie, the headlights on a 996 look truly awful to me. That wouldn't be the sole motivator, but it doesn't help the 996.
Old 06-22-2017, 02:07 PM
  #37  
srcn
Instructor
 
srcn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 181
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Nope. If I wanted a 996 Turbo instead I would have bought one. I just can't stand the aesthetics. My car has more than enough power.
Old 06-22-2017, 02:24 PM
  #38  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,387
Received 1,424 Likes on 890 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
Funny (or sad) to see that the comments on the 996 center on interior and doodads fluff. Perhaps I missed it, but no comments on its smaller/nimbler footprint and better steering.
I mentioned the steering in my prior post. It was excellent in the 996 cars.

The "smaller/nimbler footprint" isn't so clear. If you compare a 996 turbo to a 997.1 S as the OP asked, then you could argue that the 997 is the smaller/nimbler choice. When you compare those models, you'll find that the 997 is 1mm longer than the 996. The 997 is just shy of 1mm narrower than the 996, it's 0.18mm taller than the 996, and it has a wheelbase that's shorter by 0.08mm. The 997 S weighs 264 lbs. less than the 996 Turbo.
Old 06-22-2017, 03:00 PM
  #39  
squid42
Burning Brakes
 
squid42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,158
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mellowalex
I just got a 997.1 S Cabriolet.
I love the car but after driving it for two weeks, I am slightly disappointed with the pull in 2nd and 3rd gear.
I usually stay under 75mph...but I like to get there quickly.

Does anyone else feel the same way?

Makes me wish I test drove a 996 turbo before pulling the trigger on the 997.
What is your opinion between the two? Is the 996 turbo much faster?

I went with the 997 because of the newer body style and interior and wanted a low mileage car.
When changing from 996tt to 997.1tt the second and subsequent gears got longer.

(gears #(3.82 2.05 1.41 1.12 0.92 0.75)) ; 996 manual
(gears #(3.82 2.14 1.48 1.18 0.97 0.79)) ; 997.1 manual

The numbers look small, but:
  • between the two car generations that is a 5% difference for 2nd and 3rd gear
  • when switch from 1st to 2nd gear engine rpm will drop by 44% in the 996. That is already too long, but...
  • rpm drops by 46% (plus speed loss from no propulsion during clutch disengagement) in the 997.1, going from 1st to 2nd gear

The engine is the same block, but starts using variable turbine geometry and a new intake system. I don't think you benefit from VTG since you presumably talk about RPMing the gears out, and who knows what the intake does. I can imagine that this makes a real difference in raw feeling when only comparing high rpm.

ETA: my notes also show redline for the 996tt at 6700 rpm and for the 997tt at 6600 rpm. If that is correct your journey in 2nd gear starts at 3700 rpm in the 997.1 and at 3600 rpm in the 996. Small number, but all this stuff adds up.
Old 06-22-2017, 06:48 PM
  #40  
dgjks6
Drifting
 
dgjks6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,675
Received 253 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
Funny (or sad) to see that the comments on the 996 center on interior and doodads fluff. Perhaps I missed it, but no comments on its smaller/nimbler footprint and better steering.
Porsche people are no different than the rest of society. It is all about looks and image. Performance/feeling are not really important to most Porsche owners any more.
Old 06-22-2017, 07:00 PM
  #41  
vern1
Drifting
 
vern1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,399
Received 129 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
Funny (or sad) to see that the comments on the 996 center on interior and doodads fluff. Perhaps I missed it, but no comments on its smaller/nimbler footprint and better steering.
Now why would people focus on the performance aspects on a Porsche forum...

Originally Posted by Dennis C
I mentioned the steering in my prior post. It was excellent in the 996 cars.

The "smaller/nimbler footprint" isn't so clear. If you compare a 996 turbo to a 997.1 S as the OP asked, then you could argue that the 997 is the smaller/nimbler choice. When you compare those models, you'll find that the 997 is 1mm longer than the 996. The 997 is just shy of 1mm narrower than the 996, it's 0.18mm taller than the 996, and it has a wheelbase that's shorter by 0.08mm. The 997 S weighs 264 lbs. less than the 996 Turbo.
Maybe you can get someone to make up some "volume" measurements for the 997 to support this as actual measurements never seem to be enough

Overall I get the aesthetic argument as its a personal choice but the 996 turbo is not just "close" to a NA 997 its just a faster car period.
Old 06-22-2017, 07:30 PM
  #42  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,387
Received 1,424 Likes on 890 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vern1
Now why would people focus on the performance aspects on a Porsche forum...



Maybe you can get someone to make up some "volume" measurements for the 997 to support this as actual measurements never seem to be enough
In the spirit of current social debates in the USA, maybe we need a "non-binary" choice to describe size. Bigger or smaller simply don't cover it anymore. We need another choice for the Porsche owner who feels that his or her car is smaller, despite the actual physical measurements that show that it's bigger.
Old 06-22-2017, 07:39 PM
  #43  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,802
Received 6,444 Likes on 4,106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dgjks6
Porsche people are no different than the rest of society. It is all about looks and image. Performance/feeling are not really important to most Porsche owners any more.
Right, that's why a bunch of people who posted in this thread have bone-stock 997 cars without any performance enhancements whatsoever - no coilovers, DSC boxes, intake plenums, exhausts, etc. Funny how the difference of opinion from yours makes everyone a poseur.
Old 06-22-2017, 07:47 PM
  #44  
srcn
Instructor
 
srcn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 181
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

From a performance stand point my car came to me pretty much maxed out (X51, PCCB's, Bilstein damptronics). Not much left to do except for cosmetic updates (ducktail, aerokit front bumper), Fuchs wheels and DSC sport. I love it how it is though. I would have gotten to that list by now but I've been spending money on my truck project.
Old 06-22-2017, 08:18 PM
  #45  
dgjks6
Drifting
 
dgjks6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,675
Received 253 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petza914
Right, that's why a bunch of people who posted in this thread have bone-stock 997 cars without any performance enhancements whatsoever - no coilovers, DSC boxes, intake plenums, exhausts, etc. Funny how the difference of opinion from yours makes everyone a poseur.
I know They are poseurs. But that's Ok. I just think you can have a different opinion without bashing someone else's opinion.


Quick Reply: Would you have gotten a 996 Turbo over your 997?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:27 PM.