Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lightweight flywheel on a 997.1 S?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2016, 11:07 PM
  #1  
vsomoza
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
vsomoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lightweight flywheel on a 997.1 S?

My 2006 997.1 S (3.8L) is due for a new clutch and the performance shop I’ll be using has offered some interesting options including a Bully lightweight flywheel to replace the current dual mass unit. Does anyone have any experience with this?

They’re also suggesting a Bully Stage 3 kevlar/kevlar clutch to increase the clamping force by 400lbs.

We’ll be changing the IMS while we’re in there as well.

I’m looking for some thoughts, concerns and advise. Should I stick with a new OEM dual mass flywheel and OEM clutch or risk upgrading for some potential added noise and performance gains?

Thanks,
Vince
Old 11-12-2016, 02:37 AM
  #2  
SoCal C2S
Three Wheelin'
 
SoCal C2S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kalifornistan for now....
Posts: 1,469
Received 130 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Will you be primarily tracking the car?

If yes, the light flywheel will help the engine wind up quicker and if you plan to really increase torque the upstaged clutch is a good plan.

If not, be prepared for increased interior whine from the light flywheel and if you don't plan any real increase in torque, the clutch you are contemplating will drive you crazy as they tend to grab abruptly so any street driving will be....well, an experience.

I did these types of upgrades on an M3 and after putting quite a few $ into performance it was a disaster on the street but a banshee on the track.
Old 11-12-2016, 02:44 AM
  #3  
Saaboteur
Burning Brakes
 
Saaboteur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 1,065
Received 99 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

This past summer, I had my clutch done. My complaint was that ever since I got it, once warm, I'd get a throw out bearing rattle. Drove me nuts. Picked up all new parts from another Rennlist member, including OE spec dual mass flywheel and OE clutch. After the shop had the trans out, I was informed that I had a lightweight flywheel in the car. That would explain the issues I had with low speed maneuvering. Once the dual mass flywheel was back in, the driveability was much improved. I don't track the car, so everyday useability is important to me.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on using both lightweight and dual mass flywheels. I'd also add why you would need or want extra clamping force on an otherwise stock engine (presuming it is stock and not adding forced induction)?
Old 11-12-2016, 09:46 AM
  #4  
Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Why are you changing the IMS bearing? You should have the larger bearing in a 2006 S
Old 11-12-2016, 09:51 AM
  #5  
vsomoza
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
vsomoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. I appreciate you taking the time and relaying your experiences. This is such a great forum.

I was very concerned about the drivability factor so it looks like I’ll be going stock. It’s cheaper too. I like how my car can be very civil when driving my wife and kids around town and then a banshee when I take the long way home. I had my first track experience this past summer and I really enjoyed it and I will be doing it again but at the same time I’m not prepared to sacrifice everyday driving for some incremental increase in performance 2 or 3 times a year.

Thanks again, SoCal, Saaboteur
Old 11-12-2016, 09:56 AM
  #6  
vsomoza
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
vsomoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fahrer
Why are you changing the IMS bearing? You should have the larger bearing in a 2006 S
Are you sure about that Fahrer? No one can give me a verifiable answer on that. I’m only doing it for piece of mind and resale value reasons. But if you can point me to a resource that confirms that then you’ve just saved me some money.

Thanks,
v.
Old 11-12-2016, 10:24 AM
  #7  
semicycler
Three Wheelin'
 
semicycler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: MN
Posts: 1,587
Received 44 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vsomoza
Are you sure about that Fahrer? No one can give me a verifiable answer on that. I’m only doing it for piece of mind and resale value reasons. But if you can point me to a resource that confirms that then you’ve just saved me some money.

Thanks,
v.
Yes this is correct. Early 2005 997.1's have the smaller replaceable IMS bearing that was part of the class action lawsuit along with all the 996's. Later 2005 997.1's through 2008 997.1's have the larger, more reliable, but non-replaceable IMS bearing and were outside the class action window. Technically it can be replaced but the engine needs to be torn down and the crankcase split in two. Honestly your larger IMS bearing will outlast other failures on the car.

997.2's do not have an IMS so no IMS bearing.
Old 11-12-2016, 10:24 AM
  #8  
cosm3os
Burning Brakes
 
cosm3os's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 982
Received 96 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

I found the ltw fly in my old M3 was the most dramatic single mod that takes the car from street car to track car. Fun on track, but driveability, nvh suffer.
Old 11-12-2016, 10:53 AM
  #9  
SoCal C2S
Three Wheelin'
 
SoCal C2S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kalifornistan for now....
Posts: 1,469
Received 130 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cosm3os
I found the ltw fly in my old M3 was the most dramatic single mod that takes the car from street car to track car. Fun on track, but driveability, nvh suffer.
Yup....and that alone drove me to my 911. The very expensive way, but the scars on my back always remind me when I get the itch.
Old 11-12-2016, 11:43 AM
  #10  
vsomoza
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
vsomoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fahrer
Why are you changing the IMS bearing? You should have the larger bearing in a 2006 S
Originally Posted by semicycler
Yes this is correct. Early 2005 997.1's have the smaller replaceable IMS bearing that was part of the class action lawsuit along with all the 996's. Later 2005 997.1's through 2008 997.1's have the larger, more reliable, but non-replaceable IMS bearing and were outside the class action window. Technically it can be replaced but the engine needs to be torn down and the crankcase split in two. Honestly your larger IMS bearing will outlast other failures on the car.

997.2's do not have an IMS so no IMS bearing.
That’s great news semicycler. That puts my mind at ease. I do change the oil more often than suggested. The reason I still want to look at is because of this article. https://www.oregonpca.org/wp-content.../ORPCA-IMS.pdf
Old 11-14-2016, 09:56 AM
  #11  
Schnell 911
Rennlist Member
 
Schnell 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Napa Valley
Posts: 412
Received 34 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vsomoza
My 2006 997.1 S (3.8L) is due for a new clutch
How many miles have you logged? Just curious.
Old 11-14-2016, 10:01 AM
  #12  
Schnell 911
Rennlist Member
 
Schnell 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Napa Valley
Posts: 412
Received 34 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vsomoza
The reason I still want to look at is because of this article. https://www.oregonpca.org/wp-content.../ORPCA-IMS.pdf
Thanks for sharing "vsomoza" go read and a welcomed clarification, good stuff to know.
Old 11-20-2016, 12:52 AM
  #13  
vsomoza
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
vsomoza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dgetz993, the car currently has 68,800 kilometres. Frankly, I was pretty surprise when the clutch stopped working properly. I was accelerating hard and shifting from 2nd to 3rd and the something happened. At the moment it feels like the pressure plate isn’t pressing against the flywheel properly. So it might be a broken spring segment or something. I guess we’ll find out soon enough. It’s going in on Monday to finally get fix. I’ll post pics of the worn parts and report back when it’s done.
Old 11-20-2016, 11:54 AM
  #14  
Schnell 911
Rennlist Member
 
Schnell 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Napa Valley
Posts: 412
Received 34 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vsomoza
dgetz993, the car currently has 68,800 kilometres. Frankly, I was pretty surprise when the clutch stopped working properly. I was accelerating hard and shifting from 2nd to 3rd and the something happened. At the moment it feels like the pressure plate isn’t pressing against the flywheel properly. So it might be a broken spring segment or something. I guess we’ll find out soon enough. It’s going in on Monday to finally get fix. I’ll post pics of the worn parts and report back when it’s done.
Old 11-20-2016, 01:46 PM
  #15  
I am the Walrus
Burning Brakes
 
I am the Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 865
Received 53 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

My clutch went and it was the pressure plate, I was told by the shop a known issue, (2006 997 4s)
Also, leave the IMS absolutely alone, I'm sure you you have the solid version, as previous poster mentioned.
Cheers


Quick Reply: Lightweight flywheel on a 997.1 S?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:17 PM.